匈牙利社会工作者职业认同成分的性别差异

Márta B. Erdős
{"title":"匈牙利社会工作者职业认同成分的性别差异","authors":"Márta B. Erdős","doi":"10.33422/3rd.icmhs.2021.02.180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gender imbalance among social worker professionals is a potential problem in social service provision, and is indicative of social workers’ relatively low social prestige. The problem affects social worker professionals and service users globally. The dominant discourse on care, gender and gender imbalance (public perceptions on the profession, pay gaps and social positions) is deeply rooted in cultural traditions. In Hungary, a Soviet type emancipation and was present before the system change in 1989, strengthening women’s positions in the labor market and inviting them into practically all areas of work. At the same time the concept of care, connectedness and dialogue could not have a genuine and personal-level voice in these societies what has an impact on social workers’ and service users’ current positions. Authors, relying on Carol Gilligan’s theory on ethics of care, argue that care may have different manifestations but it is a common human orientation and responsibility. To study the gender aspects of social worker identity, authors employ Identity Structure Analysis, a unique method to explore identity issues, such as one’s or a social group’s evaluations, identifications and conflicted areas. Based on our results we can conclude that women social workers in Hungary have more core and less secondary profession-related constructs than men do. Further, they are more accepting about wounded healer-type transformations in the development of professional identity, and are less receptive to some elements of government rhetoric. At the same time, they value an academic degree in Social Work less than men do.","PeriodicalId":264551,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of ‏The 3rd International Conference on Modern Approach in Humanities and Social Sciences","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender Differences in Hungarian Social Workers’ Professional Identity Components\",\"authors\":\"Márta B. Erdős\",\"doi\":\"10.33422/3rd.icmhs.2021.02.180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Gender imbalance among social worker professionals is a potential problem in social service provision, and is indicative of social workers’ relatively low social prestige. The problem affects social worker professionals and service users globally. The dominant discourse on care, gender and gender imbalance (public perceptions on the profession, pay gaps and social positions) is deeply rooted in cultural traditions. In Hungary, a Soviet type emancipation and was present before the system change in 1989, strengthening women’s positions in the labor market and inviting them into practically all areas of work. At the same time the concept of care, connectedness and dialogue could not have a genuine and personal-level voice in these societies what has an impact on social workers’ and service users’ current positions. Authors, relying on Carol Gilligan’s theory on ethics of care, argue that care may have different manifestations but it is a common human orientation and responsibility. To study the gender aspects of social worker identity, authors employ Identity Structure Analysis, a unique method to explore identity issues, such as one’s or a social group’s evaluations, identifications and conflicted areas. Based on our results we can conclude that women social workers in Hungary have more core and less secondary profession-related constructs than men do. Further, they are more accepting about wounded healer-type transformations in the development of professional identity, and are less receptive to some elements of government rhetoric. At the same time, they value an academic degree in Social Work less than men do.\",\"PeriodicalId\":264551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of ‏The 3rd International Conference on Modern Approach in Humanities and Social Sciences\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of ‏The 3rd International Conference on Modern Approach in Humanities and Social Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33422/3rd.icmhs.2021.02.180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of ‏The 3rd International Conference on Modern Approach in Humanities and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33422/3rd.icmhs.2021.02.180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会工作者专业性别失衡是社会服务提供中的一个潜在问题,这表明社会工作者的社会声望相对较低。这个问题影响着全球的社会工作者、专业人士和服务使用者。关于护理、性别和性别不平衡(公众对职业的看法、薪酬差距和社会地位)的主流话语深深植根于文化传统。在匈牙利,苏联式的解放在1989年制度变革之前就已经存在,加强了妇女在劳动力市场中的地位,并邀请她们参与几乎所有领域的工作。与此同时,关怀、联系和对话的概念在这些社会中无法产生真正的、个人层面的声音,这对社会工作者和服务使用者目前的立场产生了影响。作者根据卡罗尔·吉利根的关怀伦理理论,认为关怀可能有不同的表现形式,但它是人类共同的取向和责任。为了研究社会工作者身份的性别方面,作者采用了身份结构分析这一独特的方法来探讨身份问题,如个人或社会群体的评价、认同和冲突领域。根据我们的研究结果,我们可以得出结论,匈牙利的女性社会工作者比男性有更多的核心职业和更少的次级职业相关的构念。此外,他们更能接受受伤的治疗师在职业认同发展中的转变,而不太能接受政府的一些花言巧语。与此同时,她们比男性更不看重社会工作方面的学位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gender Differences in Hungarian Social Workers’ Professional Identity Components
Gender imbalance among social worker professionals is a potential problem in social service provision, and is indicative of social workers’ relatively low social prestige. The problem affects social worker professionals and service users globally. The dominant discourse on care, gender and gender imbalance (public perceptions on the profession, pay gaps and social positions) is deeply rooted in cultural traditions. In Hungary, a Soviet type emancipation and was present before the system change in 1989, strengthening women’s positions in the labor market and inviting them into practically all areas of work. At the same time the concept of care, connectedness and dialogue could not have a genuine and personal-level voice in these societies what has an impact on social workers’ and service users’ current positions. Authors, relying on Carol Gilligan’s theory on ethics of care, argue that care may have different manifestations but it is a common human orientation and responsibility. To study the gender aspects of social worker identity, authors employ Identity Structure Analysis, a unique method to explore identity issues, such as one’s or a social group’s evaluations, identifications and conflicted areas. Based on our results we can conclude that women social workers in Hungary have more core and less secondary profession-related constructs than men do. Further, they are more accepting about wounded healer-type transformations in the development of professional identity, and are less receptive to some elements of government rhetoric. At the same time, they value an academic degree in Social Work less than men do.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
„Between two worlds” – the connections between the educational and social mobility of Roma in Hungary int he light of a career guidance program Gender Differences in Hungarian Social Workers’ Professional Identity Components Online Dispute Resolutions Post-Socialist Path in Urban Development Fuzzy Cognitive Maps for Impact Assessment in Psychological Research: Case Study of Psychological Well-being
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1