通过课程研究实施创客教学法的教师学习案例研究

Jiajia Li, S. L. Goei, W. V. van Joolingen
{"title":"通过课程研究实施创客教学法的教师学习案例研究","authors":"Jiajia Li, S. L. Goei, W. V. van Joolingen","doi":"10.1108/ijlls-04-2023-0042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study explores how lesson study (LS) can promote elementary Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) teachers’ professional development (TPD) in terms of new pedagogical practices, attitudes and beliefs in the maker education (ME) context.Design/methodology/approachThis is a case study of a LS conducted in China involving four primary school teachers, 20 grade-4 students, and one researcher who also acted as a facilitator. This study adopted an integrated model that combined the unique characteristics of Chinese LS (CLS) with the Dutch LS (LSNL) model.FindingsThis study revealed that LS participation facilitates teachers’ integration of new ME pedagogical practices in their classrooms, while their attitudes and beliefs regarding teaching and learning are increasingly aligned with ME principles. However, challenges such as time constraints, lack of research skills, and insufficient learning resources have also been identified.Research limitations/implicationsThis was a small-scale study, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.Practical implicationsThis study expands the use of LS in the ME context by highlighting its effectiveness in enhancing teachers’ PD in terms of new pedagogical practices, attitudes, and beliefs. It also recommends incorporating diverse international LS models to address the limitations associated with localized models of TPD.Originality/valueThe originality of this study lies in its adoption of an integrated LS model to enhance STEM teachers’ PD in an ME context. The findings of this study further strengthen evidence supporting the positive impact of LS on teachers’ PD.","PeriodicalId":408622,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A case study of teacher learning in enacting maker pedagogy through lesson study\",\"authors\":\"Jiajia Li, S. L. Goei, W. V. van Joolingen\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijlls-04-2023-0042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis study explores how lesson study (LS) can promote elementary Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) teachers’ professional development (TPD) in terms of new pedagogical practices, attitudes and beliefs in the maker education (ME) context.Design/methodology/approachThis is a case study of a LS conducted in China involving four primary school teachers, 20 grade-4 students, and one researcher who also acted as a facilitator. This study adopted an integrated model that combined the unique characteristics of Chinese LS (CLS) with the Dutch LS (LSNL) model.FindingsThis study revealed that LS participation facilitates teachers’ integration of new ME pedagogical practices in their classrooms, while their attitudes and beliefs regarding teaching and learning are increasingly aligned with ME principles. However, challenges such as time constraints, lack of research skills, and insufficient learning resources have also been identified.Research limitations/implicationsThis was a small-scale study, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.Practical implicationsThis study expands the use of LS in the ME context by highlighting its effectiveness in enhancing teachers’ PD in terms of new pedagogical practices, attitudes, and beliefs. It also recommends incorporating diverse international LS models to address the limitations associated with localized models of TPD.Originality/valueThe originality of this study lies in its adoption of an integrated LS model to enhance STEM teachers’ PD in an ME context. The findings of this study further strengthen evidence supporting the positive impact of LS on teachers’ PD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":408622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlls-04-2023-0042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlls-04-2023-0042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究探讨在创客教育(ME)情境下,课程研究(LS)如何从新的教学实践、态度和信念等方面促进基础科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)教师的专业发展。设计/方法/方法这是一个在中国进行的LS案例研究,涉及4名小学教师,20名四年级学生和一名作为促进者的研究人员。本研究采用了将中国LS (CLS)的独特特征与荷兰LS (LSNL)模型相结合的综合模型。研究结果本研究显示,参与教学有助于教师在课堂上融入新的ME教学实践,而他们对教学和学习的态度和信念也越来越符合ME原则。然而,时间限制、缺乏研究技能和学习资源不足等挑战也已被确定。研究局限性/意义这是一项小规模研究,可能会限制研究结果的普遍性。实践意义本研究通过强调其在新的教学实践、态度和信念方面增强教师PD的有效性,扩展了语言学习在ME背景下的应用。它还建议纳入各种国际LS模型,以解决与TPD本地化模型相关的局限性。创新/价值本研究的创新之处在于采用了一个整合的LS模型来提高STEM教师在ME背景下的PD。本研究的发现进一步强化了支持学习对教师PD有积极影响的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A case study of teacher learning in enacting maker pedagogy through lesson study
PurposeThis study explores how lesson study (LS) can promote elementary Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) teachers’ professional development (TPD) in terms of new pedagogical practices, attitudes and beliefs in the maker education (ME) context.Design/methodology/approachThis is a case study of a LS conducted in China involving four primary school teachers, 20 grade-4 students, and one researcher who also acted as a facilitator. This study adopted an integrated model that combined the unique characteristics of Chinese LS (CLS) with the Dutch LS (LSNL) model.FindingsThis study revealed that LS participation facilitates teachers’ integration of new ME pedagogical practices in their classrooms, while their attitudes and beliefs regarding teaching and learning are increasingly aligned with ME principles. However, challenges such as time constraints, lack of research skills, and insufficient learning resources have also been identified.Research limitations/implicationsThis was a small-scale study, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.Practical implicationsThis study expands the use of LS in the ME context by highlighting its effectiveness in enhancing teachers’ PD in terms of new pedagogical practices, attitudes, and beliefs. It also recommends incorporating diverse international LS models to address the limitations associated with localized models of TPD.Originality/valueThe originality of this study lies in its adoption of an integrated LS model to enhance STEM teachers’ PD in an ME context. The findings of this study further strengthen evidence supporting the positive impact of LS on teachers’ PD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adapting lesson study for early-years practitioners Book review: Reforming lesson study in Japan: theories of action for schools as learning communities Book review: Lesson study with mathematics and science preservice teachers: finding the forms Lesson study in science teacher preparation programs: a literature review Design-based research to develop lesson study for transformative assessment: teachers’ reactions, learning, organizational support, and use
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1