设计模式挖掘工具的基准评估

Lajos Jeno Fülöp, R. Ferenc, T. Gyimóthy
{"title":"设计模式挖掘工具的基准评估","authors":"Lajos Jeno Fülöp, R. Ferenc, T. Gyimóthy","doi":"10.1109/CSMR.2008.4493309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recovering design pattern usage in source code is a very difficult task. Several tools are described in the literature for this purpose, but there is little work invested in evaluating them. The main reason for this is the lack of an approved benchmark for these tools. In this paper we present work in progress towards creating a benchmark, called DEEBEE (design pattern evaluation benchmark environment), for evaluating and comparing design pattern miner tools. It is programming language, tool, pattern and software independent, and it is open to the community and freely available. Currently, the benchmark database contains the results of three tools: Columbus (C++), Maisa (C++), and design pattern detection tool (Java). The tools were evaluated on reference implementations of patterns and on open source software (Mozilla, NotePad++, JHotDraw, JRefactory and JUnit). Additionally, instances recovered by researchers are added from NotePad++ as well. Some recovered patterns are already verified by experienced developers. This work is the first step in building a large reference database of design pattern usage in open source software and we expect that researchers will join us in this effort.","PeriodicalId":350838,"journal":{"name":"2008 12th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a Benchmark for Evaluating Design Pattern Miner Tools\",\"authors\":\"Lajos Jeno Fülöp, R. Ferenc, T. Gyimóthy\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSMR.2008.4493309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recovering design pattern usage in source code is a very difficult task. Several tools are described in the literature for this purpose, but there is little work invested in evaluating them. The main reason for this is the lack of an approved benchmark for these tools. In this paper we present work in progress towards creating a benchmark, called DEEBEE (design pattern evaluation benchmark environment), for evaluating and comparing design pattern miner tools. It is programming language, tool, pattern and software independent, and it is open to the community and freely available. Currently, the benchmark database contains the results of three tools: Columbus (C++), Maisa (C++), and design pattern detection tool (Java). The tools were evaluated on reference implementations of patterns and on open source software (Mozilla, NotePad++, JHotDraw, JRefactory and JUnit). Additionally, instances recovered by researchers are added from NotePad++ as well. Some recovered patterns are already verified by experienced developers. This work is the first step in building a large reference database of design pattern usage in open source software and we expect that researchers will join us in this effort.\",\"PeriodicalId\":350838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 12th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 12th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSMR.2008.4493309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 12th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSMR.2008.4493309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

摘要

在源代码中恢复设计模式的使用是一项非常困难的任务。为了这个目的,文献中描述了一些工具,但是很少有工作投资于评估它们。造成这种情况的主要原因是缺乏针对这些工具的认可基准。在本文中,我们介绍了正在进行的创建基准的工作,称为DEEBEE(设计模式评估基准环境),用于评估和比较设计模式挖掘工具。它是独立于编程语言、工具、模式和软件的,并且对社区开放,免费提供。目前,基准数据库包含三个工具的结果:Columbus (c++)、Maisa (c++)和设计模式检测工具(Java)。这些工具在模式的参考实现和开源软件(Mozilla、notepad++、JHotDraw、JRefactory和JUnit)上进行了评估。此外,研究人员还从notepad++中添加了恢复的实例。一些恢复的模式已经被经验丰富的开发人员验证过了。这项工作是在开源软件中构建大型设计模式使用参考数据库的第一步,我们期待研究人员加入我们的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards a Benchmark for Evaluating Design Pattern Miner Tools
Recovering design pattern usage in source code is a very difficult task. Several tools are described in the literature for this purpose, but there is little work invested in evaluating them. The main reason for this is the lack of an approved benchmark for these tools. In this paper we present work in progress towards creating a benchmark, called DEEBEE (design pattern evaluation benchmark environment), for evaluating and comparing design pattern miner tools. It is programming language, tool, pattern and software independent, and it is open to the community and freely available. Currently, the benchmark database contains the results of three tools: Columbus (C++), Maisa (C++), and design pattern detection tool (Java). The tools were evaluated on reference implementations of patterns and on open source software (Mozilla, NotePad++, JHotDraw, JRefactory and JUnit). Additionally, instances recovered by researchers are added from NotePad++ as well. Some recovered patterns are already verified by experienced developers. This work is the first step in building a large reference database of design pattern usage in open source software and we expect that researchers will join us in this effort.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modularity-Oriented Refactoring Quantifying Maintainability in Feature Oriented Product Lines Assessing the Support of ER and UML Class Diagrams during Maintenance Activities on Data Models A Flexible Framework to Support Collaborative Software Evolution Analysis Towards a Benchmark for Evaluating Design Pattern Miner Tools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1