离体灌注大鼠辅助心脏控制序贯起搏。

European journal of cardiology Pub Date : 1979-09-01
O C Penn, S T Boyd, J B Korrûbel, L H Opie, C N Barnard
{"title":"离体灌注大鼠辅助心脏控制序贯起搏。","authors":"O C Penn,&nbsp;S T Boyd,&nbsp;J B Korrûbel,&nbsp;L H Opie,&nbsp;C N Barnard","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An important question after clinical auxiliary heart transplantation is whether controlled pacing of both hearts is desirable in order to protect the diseased recipient heart. A comparison of the effects of spontaneous beating with three types of pacing (random, simultaneous and sequential) was undertaken in an isolated perfused working double rat heart. The two hearts were attached to each other by the atria, in a way comparable to the clinical situation. During controlled sequential pacing of both normal hearts, the peak systolic pressure fell and diastolic pressure rose, but the combined cardiac output did not changes. In contrast, during simultaneous pacing, systolic pressure rose, diastolic pressure fell and coronary flow was less than with sequential pacing, but the oxygen uptake was higher. Hence the effects of sequential pacing could be expected to be beneficial when function of one of the hearts was depressed by left main coronary artery ligation. During sequential pacing the cardiac output was significantly improved from 10 to 30 ml/min (P less than 0.001) and coronary flow rose. Myocardial oxygen consumption increased from 80 to 110 microliters/g/min (P less than 0.05). Thus sequential pacing could improve the severely depressed hemodynamics of the coronary-ligated heart in the presence of an auxiliary heart. The increased myocardial oxygen consumption is viewed as a beneficial effect of increased diastolic perfusion pressure and was not associated with increased enzyme release. It is concluded that the effects of sequential pacing warrant assessment in clinical auxiliary heart transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72971,"journal":{"name":"European journal of cardiology","volume":"10 3","pages":"229-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Controlled sequential pacing in isolated perfused auxiliary rat hearts.\",\"authors\":\"O C Penn,&nbsp;S T Boyd,&nbsp;J B Korrûbel,&nbsp;L H Opie,&nbsp;C N Barnard\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>An important question after clinical auxiliary heart transplantation is whether controlled pacing of both hearts is desirable in order to protect the diseased recipient heart. A comparison of the effects of spontaneous beating with three types of pacing (random, simultaneous and sequential) was undertaken in an isolated perfused working double rat heart. The two hearts were attached to each other by the atria, in a way comparable to the clinical situation. During controlled sequential pacing of both normal hearts, the peak systolic pressure fell and diastolic pressure rose, but the combined cardiac output did not changes. In contrast, during simultaneous pacing, systolic pressure rose, diastolic pressure fell and coronary flow was less than with sequential pacing, but the oxygen uptake was higher. Hence the effects of sequential pacing could be expected to be beneficial when function of one of the hearts was depressed by left main coronary artery ligation. During sequential pacing the cardiac output was significantly improved from 10 to 30 ml/min (P less than 0.001) and coronary flow rose. Myocardial oxygen consumption increased from 80 to 110 microliters/g/min (P less than 0.05). Thus sequential pacing could improve the severely depressed hemodynamics of the coronary-ligated heart in the presence of an auxiliary heart. The increased myocardial oxygen consumption is viewed as a beneficial effect of increased diastolic perfusion pressure and was not associated with increased enzyme release. It is concluded that the effects of sequential pacing warrant assessment in clinical auxiliary heart transplantation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of cardiology\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"229-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1979-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床辅助心脏移植后的一个重要问题是是否需要控制双心起搏以保护患病的受者心脏。在离体双鼠灌注工作心脏中,比较了三种起搏方式(随机、同步和顺序)对自发搏动的影响。这两颗心脏通过心房连接在一起,与临床情况类似。在控制序贯起搏时,两颗正常心脏的峰值收缩压下降,舒张压上升,但总心输出量没有变化。同期起搏时收缩压升高,舒张压下降,冠状动脉血流较序贯起搏时减少,但摄氧量较高。因此,当左主干冠状动脉结扎导致其中一个心脏功能下降时,序贯起搏的效果可能是有益的。序贯起搏时心输出量由10 ~ 30 ml/min显著提高(P < 0.001),冠状动脉血流增加。心肌耗氧量由80微升/g/min升高至110微升/g/min (P < 0.05)。因此,序贯起搏可以改善辅助心脏存在时冠状结扎心脏严重压抑的血流动力学。心肌耗氧量增加被认为是舒张期灌注压增加的有益影响,与酶释放增加无关。结论:序贯起搏在临床辅助心脏移植中的作用值得评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Controlled sequential pacing in isolated perfused auxiliary rat hearts.

An important question after clinical auxiliary heart transplantation is whether controlled pacing of both hearts is desirable in order to protect the diseased recipient heart. A comparison of the effects of spontaneous beating with three types of pacing (random, simultaneous and sequential) was undertaken in an isolated perfused working double rat heart. The two hearts were attached to each other by the atria, in a way comparable to the clinical situation. During controlled sequential pacing of both normal hearts, the peak systolic pressure fell and diastolic pressure rose, but the combined cardiac output did not changes. In contrast, during simultaneous pacing, systolic pressure rose, diastolic pressure fell and coronary flow was less than with sequential pacing, but the oxygen uptake was higher. Hence the effects of sequential pacing could be expected to be beneficial when function of one of the hearts was depressed by left main coronary artery ligation. During sequential pacing the cardiac output was significantly improved from 10 to 30 ml/min (P less than 0.001) and coronary flow rose. Myocardial oxygen consumption increased from 80 to 110 microliters/g/min (P less than 0.05). Thus sequential pacing could improve the severely depressed hemodynamics of the coronary-ligated heart in the presence of an auxiliary heart. The increased myocardial oxygen consumption is viewed as a beneficial effect of increased diastolic perfusion pressure and was not associated with increased enzyme release. It is concluded that the effects of sequential pacing warrant assessment in clinical auxiliary heart transplantation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Plasma pancreatic polypeptide and gastrin in the assessment of autonomic activity in acute myocardial infarction. Effects of intrinsic sympathetic activity of beta-blockers on SA and AV nodes in man. Coronary arterial stenosis and subclavian steal in Takayasu's arteritis. Changes in 86-rubidium uptake in erythrocytes of digoxin-treated patients, in heart failure with sinus rhythm. Relationship to clinical effects. Digoxin in the elderly and in renal failure. Contribution of erythrocyte 86-rubidium uptake tests.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1