国际人格项目库(IPIP)大五因素标记在尼日利亚的信度和并发效度

A. Akinsulore, O. Fatoye, O. Awaa, O. Aloba, B. Mapayi, O. Ibigbami
{"title":"国际人格项目库(IPIP)大五因素标记在尼日利亚的信度和并发效度","authors":"A. Akinsulore, O. Fatoye, O. Awaa, O. Aloba, B. Mapayi, O. Ibigbami","doi":"10.4314/NJPSYC.V10I2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : The five-factor model (FFM) of personality is currently the most adopted model of personality assessment globally. This model has several versions and has been translated in to several languages. It has been used in several parts of the world but hardly or not at all in Nigeria. Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the internal consistency and concurrent validity of the IPIP in a Nigerian sample. Methods : The 100 items International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) by Goldberg and the Eyesenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ) was administered to 50 adults in Kano. Their responses were coded and analysed using SPSS version 16 by determing their Cronbach alphas for the internal consistency and Pearson correlation for the concurrent validity.  Significance was set at <0.05 and at two tails. Results: The mean Cronbach alphas for the IPIP and EPQ were 0.602 and 0.653 respectively. The concurrent validity of IPIP extraversion and with EPQ extraversion was 0.344 and significant (p=0.014). That of the IPIP emotional stability and EPQ neuroticism domain was also significant (r=0.412, p=0.004). The EPQ psychoticism domain correlated negatively and significantly with the IPIP agreeableness (r=-0.282; p=0.047) and conscientiousness (r=-0.012; p=0.935). Conclusion : The researchers concluded that the 100 item-IPIP is a valid personality assessment instrument in Nigerians. Key words: Five factor model; 100-item IPIP validation in Nigerians ; 90-item EPQ; personality assessment","PeriodicalId":422969,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the International Personality item Pool (IPIP) Big-five Factor Markers in Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"A. Akinsulore, O. Fatoye, O. Awaa, O. Aloba, B. Mapayi, O. Ibigbami\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/NJPSYC.V10I2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background : The five-factor model (FFM) of personality is currently the most adopted model of personality assessment globally. This model has several versions and has been translated in to several languages. It has been used in several parts of the world but hardly or not at all in Nigeria. Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the internal consistency and concurrent validity of the IPIP in a Nigerian sample. Methods : The 100 items International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) by Goldberg and the Eyesenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ) was administered to 50 adults in Kano. Their responses were coded and analysed using SPSS version 16 by determing their Cronbach alphas for the internal consistency and Pearson correlation for the concurrent validity.  Significance was set at <0.05 and at two tails. Results: The mean Cronbach alphas for the IPIP and EPQ were 0.602 and 0.653 respectively. The concurrent validity of IPIP extraversion and with EPQ extraversion was 0.344 and significant (p=0.014). That of the IPIP emotional stability and EPQ neuroticism domain was also significant (r=0.412, p=0.004). The EPQ psychoticism domain correlated negatively and significantly with the IPIP agreeableness (r=-0.282; p=0.047) and conscientiousness (r=-0.012; p=0.935). Conclusion : The researchers concluded that the 100 item-IPIP is a valid personality assessment instrument in Nigerians. Key words: Five factor model; 100-item IPIP validation in Nigerians ; 90-item EPQ; personality assessment\",\"PeriodicalId\":422969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nigerian Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nigerian Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/NJPSYC.V10I2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/NJPSYC.V10I2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:人格五因素模型(FFM)是目前国际上采用最多的人格评估模型。这个模型有几个版本,并被翻译成几种语言。它已经在世界上的几个地方被使用,但在尼日利亚几乎没有或根本没有。目的:本研究的目的是评估尼日利亚样本中IPIP的内部一致性和并发效度。方法:对卡诺市50名成人进行100项Goldberg国际人格题库(IPIP)和Eyesenck人格问卷(EPQ)调查。通过确定其内部一致性的Cronbach alpha和并发效度的Pearson相关性,对他们的回答进行编码和分析,使用SPSS版本16。显著性设为<0.05和两个尾部。结果:IPIP和EPQ的平均Cronbach alpha值分别为0.602和0.653。IPIP外向性与EPQ外向性的并发效度为0.344,具有显著性(p=0.014)。IPIP情绪稳定性和EPQ神经质域的差异也有统计学意义(r=0.412, p=0.004)。EPQ精神状态域与IPIP亲和性呈显著负相关(r=-0.282;P =0.047)和责任心(r=-0.012;p = 0.935)。结论:100项ipip是一种有效的尼日利亚人人格评估工具。关键词:五因素模型;尼日利亚的100项IPIP验证;90项EPQ;人格评估
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the International Personality item Pool (IPIP) Big-five Factor Markers in Nigeria
Background : The five-factor model (FFM) of personality is currently the most adopted model of personality assessment globally. This model has several versions and has been translated in to several languages. It has been used in several parts of the world but hardly or not at all in Nigeria. Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the internal consistency and concurrent validity of the IPIP in a Nigerian sample. Methods : The 100 items International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) by Goldberg and the Eyesenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ) was administered to 50 adults in Kano. Their responses were coded and analysed using SPSS version 16 by determing their Cronbach alphas for the internal consistency and Pearson correlation for the concurrent validity.  Significance was set at <0.05 and at two tails. Results: The mean Cronbach alphas for the IPIP and EPQ were 0.602 and 0.653 respectively. The concurrent validity of IPIP extraversion and with EPQ extraversion was 0.344 and significant (p=0.014). That of the IPIP emotional stability and EPQ neuroticism domain was also significant (r=0.412, p=0.004). The EPQ psychoticism domain correlated negatively and significantly with the IPIP agreeableness (r=-0.282; p=0.047) and conscientiousness (r=-0.012; p=0.935). Conclusion : The researchers concluded that the 100 item-IPIP is a valid personality assessment instrument in Nigerians. Key words: Five factor model; 100-item IPIP validation in Nigerians ; 90-item EPQ; personality assessment
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The importance of 'Group Social Support' in treatment and re-union of a declared missing paranoid schizophrenic patient with her family: A Case Report An Appraisal of the Mental Health Curriculum for Undergraduates in Nigerian Medical Schools Prevalence and Factors Responsible for Stigmatization of the Mentally Ill among Student Nurses in North-Eastern Nigeria Anxio-depressive Symptoms in Patients with Cardiac Failure in Jos University Teaching Hospital (JUTH) Attitudes of Medical Students to Psychiatry in a Nigerian University
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1