行政调查与律师权利

Yong Chul Park
{"title":"行政调查与律师权利","authors":"Yong Chul Park","doi":"10.34222/kdps.2023.15.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The assertion to have the right to counsel or let their counsel participate in administrative procedures does not necessarily stem from the principle of due process of law under the discussions of U.S. law. In other words, having a counsel to represent himself or herself may be a very important first step to protect the human rights of those who is subject to administrative investigations discussed under various Korean laws, but it is also necessary to consider that the right to participate may be somewhat nominal or unequal because the right to counsel in a criminal procedure setting, it is not an active right protected by the government, reaching to a point where a counsel is provided by the government as a right. Of course, I do not agree with the argument that the right to counsel in an administrative investigation should be deleted or denied because of such negative aspects, but rather, the right to counsel in an administrative investigation is not a basic constitutional right based on the principle of due process.","PeriodicalId":384688,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Association of Criminal Procedure Law","volume":"203 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Administration Investigation & Right to Counsel\",\"authors\":\"Yong Chul Park\",\"doi\":\"10.34222/kdps.2023.15.2.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The assertion to have the right to counsel or let their counsel participate in administrative procedures does not necessarily stem from the principle of due process of law under the discussions of U.S. law. In other words, having a counsel to represent himself or herself may be a very important first step to protect the human rights of those who is subject to administrative investigations discussed under various Korean laws, but it is also necessary to consider that the right to participate may be somewhat nominal or unequal because the right to counsel in a criminal procedure setting, it is not an active right protected by the government, reaching to a point where a counsel is provided by the government as a right. Of course, I do not agree with the argument that the right to counsel in an administrative investigation should be deleted or denied because of such negative aspects, but rather, the right to counsel in an administrative investigation is not a basic constitutional right based on the principle of due process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":384688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Korean Association of Criminal Procedure Law\",\"volume\":\"203 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Korean Association of Criminal Procedure Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34222/kdps.2023.15.2.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Association of Criminal Procedure Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34222/kdps.2023.15.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

主张有权请律师或让其律师参与行政程序并不一定源于美国法律讨论中的正当法律程序原则。换句话说,在韩国的各种法律中,为保护行政调查对象的人权,聘请律师是非常重要的第一步,但也有必要考虑到,参与的权利可能只是名义上的或不平等的,因为在刑事诉讼中,律师的权利并不是政府保护的积极权利。达到由政府提供法律顾问作为一种权利的地步。当然,我不同意因为这些负面因素就应该删除或否认行政调查中的辩护权的说法,而是认为行政调查中的辩护权不是基于正当程序原则的基本宪法权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Administration Investigation & Right to Counsel
The assertion to have the right to counsel or let their counsel participate in administrative procedures does not necessarily stem from the principle of due process of law under the discussions of U.S. law. In other words, having a counsel to represent himself or herself may be a very important first step to protect the human rights of those who is subject to administrative investigations discussed under various Korean laws, but it is also necessary to consider that the right to participate may be somewhat nominal or unequal because the right to counsel in a criminal procedure setting, it is not an active right protected by the government, reaching to a point where a counsel is provided by the government as a right. Of course, I do not agree with the argument that the right to counsel in an administrative investigation should be deleted or denied because of such negative aspects, but rather, the right to counsel in an administrative investigation is not a basic constitutional right based on the principle of due process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
. Meaning and implications of digital documentation of criminal trials in Germany A Meaning of the revision of the so-called 『Investigation Rules』 and future tasks Protection of Minor Victims of Sexual Violence Crimes in Criminal Proceedings and the Defendant's Right to Cross-Examine .
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1