FMLA后病假:就业平权的实证分析

Christopher L. Griffin
{"title":"FMLA后病假:就业平权的实证分析","authors":"Christopher L. Griffin","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1974572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Article represents the first empirical analysis of the possible effects that the Family Medical and Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA) had on medical leave-taking patterns within the general population. I estimate changes in work-leave rates for both one’s own illness and family members’ medical conditions through the natural experiment created by the existence of state-level FMLA-like statutes before 1993. Applying two identification strategies to an original, more finely-tuned coding of state laws and using the previously unexploited Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) from 1987 through 2006, I find no robust evidence that the FMLA affected either form of leave-taking. In light of this “null” result, I consider several possible explanations and discuss more general lessons for the empirical study of employment rights laws. I also argue, contrary to many accounts of the FMLA’s failure, that a null finding may be consistent with the FMLA having generated benefits for covered employees even if the statute did not increase leave-taking rates.","PeriodicalId":357008,"journal":{"name":"Employment Law eJournal","volume":"224 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical Leave-Taking After the FMLA: An Empirical Analysis of Affirmative Employment Rights\",\"authors\":\"Christopher L. Griffin\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1974572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This Article represents the first empirical analysis of the possible effects that the Family Medical and Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA) had on medical leave-taking patterns within the general population. I estimate changes in work-leave rates for both one’s own illness and family members’ medical conditions through the natural experiment created by the existence of state-level FMLA-like statutes before 1993. Applying two identification strategies to an original, more finely-tuned coding of state laws and using the previously unexploited Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) from 1987 through 2006, I find no robust evidence that the FMLA affected either form of leave-taking. In light of this “null” result, I consider several possible explanations and discuss more general lessons for the empirical study of employment rights laws. I also argue, contrary to many accounts of the FMLA’s failure, that a null finding may be consistent with the FMLA having generated benefits for covered employees even if the statute did not increase leave-taking rates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":357008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Employment Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"224 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Employment Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1974572\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employment Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1974572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文代表了1993年《家庭医疗和休假法》(FMLA)对普通人群休病假模式可能产生的影响的第一次实证分析。我通过1993年之前存在的州一级类似fmla的法规所创造的自然实验,估计了自己的疾病和家庭成员的医疗条件下工作休假率的变化。将两种识别策略应用于一种原始的、更精细的州法律编码,并使用1987年至2006年以前未开发的收入动态小组研究(PSID),我发现没有强有力的证据表明FMLA影响了任何一种形式的休假。鉴于这一“无效”结果,我考虑了几种可能的解释,并讨论了就业权利法实证研究的更一般的经验教训。我还认为,与许多关于FMLA失败的说法相反,无效的发现可能与FMLA为受保员工带来福利是一致的,即使法规没有增加休假率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Medical Leave-Taking After the FMLA: An Empirical Analysis of Affirmative Employment Rights
This Article represents the first empirical analysis of the possible effects that the Family Medical and Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA) had on medical leave-taking patterns within the general population. I estimate changes in work-leave rates for both one’s own illness and family members’ medical conditions through the natural experiment created by the existence of state-level FMLA-like statutes before 1993. Applying two identification strategies to an original, more finely-tuned coding of state laws and using the previously unexploited Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) from 1987 through 2006, I find no robust evidence that the FMLA affected either form of leave-taking. In light of this “null” result, I consider several possible explanations and discuss more general lessons for the empirical study of employment rights laws. I also argue, contrary to many accounts of the FMLA’s failure, that a null finding may be consistent with the FMLA having generated benefits for covered employees even if the statute did not increase leave-taking rates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Work from/for Home: Recommendations to Ease Post-Pandemic Multiple Burden on Women Teleworking in the Aftermath of the Covid-19 Pandemic: Enabling Conditions for a Successful Transition A Summary of the Statistical Aspects of the Procedures for Resolving Potential Employment Discrimination Recently Issued by the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Along with a Commentary Creative Labour in the Era of Covid-19: The Case of Freelancers Non-Competes and Other Contracts of Dispossession
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1