计算机测试(CBT)和纸笔测试(PPT)对中学生经济学学业成绩和考试焦虑的影响

C. C. Abanobi, Ngozi N. Agu, L. I. Eleje, Ifeoma C. Metu, Njideka G. Mbelede, N. C. Ezeugo
{"title":"计算机测试(CBT)和纸笔测试(PPT)对中学生经济学学业成绩和考试焦虑的影响","authors":"C. C. Abanobi, Ngozi N. Agu, L. I. Eleje, Ifeoma C. Metu, Njideka G. Mbelede, N. C. Ezeugo","doi":"10.22159/ijoe.2023v11i1.45960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Investigated in this study were the effects of Computer Based Test (CBT) and Paper and Pencil Tests (PPT) on Secondary School (SS) students’ academic achievement and test anxiety in Economics. The pretest-posttest non-randomized control group design was used as the research design. The study was done in Asaba, Delta State, Nigeria. All Senior Secondary II (SSII) students who offered Economics comprised the study’s population. 107 SS II students were selected as the sample. Two instruments - Economics Achievement Test (EAT) and Test Anxiety Inventory (TAI) were used for data collection. Both EAT and TAI were validated by the experts. The reliability coefficients of the instruments were .95 and .68, respectively. The data collected were analyzed using mean statistics to answer two research questions, whereas two formulated null hypotheses were tested at a .05 level of significance using ANCOVA. The findings of the study indicated that students’ mean achievement scores in PPT were slightly higher than students’ mean achievement scores in CBT and the students’ mean achievement scores were significantly different. Students in PPT exhibited greater test anxiety than their counterparts in CBT, even though the difference in the mean test anxiety scores of students in CBT and PPT was not significant. Based on the findings, the researchers recommended, among others, that the Federal Government should make and implement policies to mandate senior secondary students to use PPT for all internal assessments in various subjects in the country.","PeriodicalId":413908,"journal":{"name":"Innovare Journal of Education","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Computer-Based Test (CBT) and Paper and Pencil Test (PPT) on Academic Achievement and Test Anxiety of Secondary School Students’ in Economics\",\"authors\":\"C. C. Abanobi, Ngozi N. Agu, L. I. Eleje, Ifeoma C. Metu, Njideka G. Mbelede, N. C. Ezeugo\",\"doi\":\"10.22159/ijoe.2023v11i1.45960\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Investigated in this study were the effects of Computer Based Test (CBT) and Paper and Pencil Tests (PPT) on Secondary School (SS) students’ academic achievement and test anxiety in Economics. The pretest-posttest non-randomized control group design was used as the research design. The study was done in Asaba, Delta State, Nigeria. All Senior Secondary II (SSII) students who offered Economics comprised the study’s population. 107 SS II students were selected as the sample. Two instruments - Economics Achievement Test (EAT) and Test Anxiety Inventory (TAI) were used for data collection. Both EAT and TAI were validated by the experts. The reliability coefficients of the instruments were .95 and .68, respectively. The data collected were analyzed using mean statistics to answer two research questions, whereas two formulated null hypotheses were tested at a .05 level of significance using ANCOVA. The findings of the study indicated that students’ mean achievement scores in PPT were slightly higher than students’ mean achievement scores in CBT and the students’ mean achievement scores were significantly different. Students in PPT exhibited greater test anxiety than their counterparts in CBT, even though the difference in the mean test anxiety scores of students in CBT and PPT was not significant. Based on the findings, the researchers recommended, among others, that the Federal Government should make and implement policies to mandate senior secondary students to use PPT for all internal assessments in various subjects in the country.\",\"PeriodicalId\":413908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovare Journal of Education\",\"volume\":\"114 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovare Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22159/ijoe.2023v11i1.45960\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovare Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22159/ijoe.2023v11i1.45960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究探讨了计算机测试(CBT)和纸笔测试(PPT)对中专学生经济学学业成绩和考试焦虑的影响。研究设计采用前测后测非随机对照组设计。这项研究是在尼日利亚三角洲州的Asaba进行的。所有提供经济学的高中II (SSII)学生构成了研究的人口。选取107名高中二年级学生作为样本。采用经济学成就测验(EAT)和考试焦虑量表(TAI)两种工具进行数据收集。EAT和TAI都经过了专家的验证。仪器的信度系数分别为0.95和0.68。收集的数据使用平均统计来分析两个研究问题,而两个制定的零假设使用ANCOVA在0.05水平上进行显著性检验。研究结果表明,学生在PPT上的平均成就分数略高于学生在CBT上的平均成就分数,学生在PPT上的平均成就分数有显著差异。PPT组的学生比CBT组的学生表现出更大的考试焦虑,尽管CBT组和PPT组学生的平均考试焦虑得分差异不显著。根据调查结果,研究人员建议,联邦政府应制定和实施政策,强制高中生在全国各学科的所有内部评估中使用PPT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of Computer-Based Test (CBT) and Paper and Pencil Test (PPT) on Academic Achievement and Test Anxiety of Secondary School Students’ in Economics
Investigated in this study were the effects of Computer Based Test (CBT) and Paper and Pencil Tests (PPT) on Secondary School (SS) students’ academic achievement and test anxiety in Economics. The pretest-posttest non-randomized control group design was used as the research design. The study was done in Asaba, Delta State, Nigeria. All Senior Secondary II (SSII) students who offered Economics comprised the study’s population. 107 SS II students were selected as the sample. Two instruments - Economics Achievement Test (EAT) and Test Anxiety Inventory (TAI) were used for data collection. Both EAT and TAI were validated by the experts. The reliability coefficients of the instruments were .95 and .68, respectively. The data collected were analyzed using mean statistics to answer two research questions, whereas two formulated null hypotheses were tested at a .05 level of significance using ANCOVA. The findings of the study indicated that students’ mean achievement scores in PPT were slightly higher than students’ mean achievement scores in CBT and the students’ mean achievement scores were significantly different. Students in PPT exhibited greater test anxiety than their counterparts in CBT, even though the difference in the mean test anxiety scores of students in CBT and PPT was not significant. Based on the findings, the researchers recommended, among others, that the Federal Government should make and implement policies to mandate senior secondary students to use PPT for all internal assessments in various subjects in the country.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Towards Students’ Academic Performance Pre-School Teachers’ Views on the Impact of Visual Arts Education on Early Childhood Education The Effect of Improvised Computer-Based Software Package on Secondary School Students’ Achievement and Attitude Towards Mathematics Investigating Awareness of Guidance Services among Students in Selected Senior High Schools in the Upper East Region of Ghana Issues and Snags in the Provision of Cross-Border Higher Education: Reflecting on Experiences from East Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1