气候阻挠中的男性中心主义和保守主义。荷兰智库CLINTEL的案例。

Mayte Moreno-Soldevila
{"title":"气候阻挠中的男性中心主义和保守主义。荷兰智库CLINTEL的案例。","authors":"Mayte Moreno-Soldevila","doi":"10.12795/ambitos.2022.i55.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within the climate countermovement, neoliberal think tanks have played a predominant role in both the United States and Europe. There are links between climate obstructionism and ideologies such as conservatism and the extreme right; androcentrism, patriarchal worldviews and industrial masculinities, and whiteness and xenosceptic ideologies. This research takes as a case study the Dutch think tank CLINTEL, which, despite having been founded in 2019, has managed to get a declaration against the climate emergency to members of the European Parliament, which has been signed by climate action contrarians from all over the world. This paper analyses the contrarian framings present in this declaration based on the typology established by Almiron et al. (2020). In addition, this research makes a gendered discursive analysis of the discussion about this statement in a forum of the European Parliament, where CLINTEL met with members of the far-right Dutch party Forum van Democratie (FvD), part of the European Conservatives and Reformists group. The study on CLINTEL's statement shows that the think tank uses similar frames as other European denialist think tanks. Its climate declaration has a significant gender bias, with an overwhelming over-representation of men among the signatories. This, together with the discursive analysis of its discussion with members of the European Parliament, is a contribution to the emerging line of research on industrial masculinities and climate change obstructionism. This paper provides information on the think tank CLINTEL, helping to fill a knowledge gap on the climate change countermovement in the Netherlands.","PeriodicalId":430437,"journal":{"name":"Ámbitos. Revista Internacional de Comunicación","volume":"148 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Androcentrism and conservatism within climate obstructionism. The case of the think tank CLINTEL in The Netherlands.\",\"authors\":\"Mayte Moreno-Soldevila\",\"doi\":\"10.12795/ambitos.2022.i55.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Within the climate countermovement, neoliberal think tanks have played a predominant role in both the United States and Europe. There are links between climate obstructionism and ideologies such as conservatism and the extreme right; androcentrism, patriarchal worldviews and industrial masculinities, and whiteness and xenosceptic ideologies. This research takes as a case study the Dutch think tank CLINTEL, which, despite having been founded in 2019, has managed to get a declaration against the climate emergency to members of the European Parliament, which has been signed by climate action contrarians from all over the world. This paper analyses the contrarian framings present in this declaration based on the typology established by Almiron et al. (2020). In addition, this research makes a gendered discursive analysis of the discussion about this statement in a forum of the European Parliament, where CLINTEL met with members of the far-right Dutch party Forum van Democratie (FvD), part of the European Conservatives and Reformists group. The study on CLINTEL's statement shows that the think tank uses similar frames as other European denialist think tanks. Its climate declaration has a significant gender bias, with an overwhelming over-representation of men among the signatories. This, together with the discursive analysis of its discussion with members of the European Parliament, is a contribution to the emerging line of research on industrial masculinities and climate change obstructionism. This paper provides information on the think tank CLINTEL, helping to fill a knowledge gap on the climate change countermovement in the Netherlands.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ámbitos. Revista Internacional de Comunicación\",\"volume\":\"148 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ámbitos. Revista Internacional de Comunicación\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12795/ambitos.2022.i55.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ámbitos. Revista Internacional de Comunicación","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12795/ambitos.2022.i55.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在反气候运动中,新自由主义智库在美国和欧洲都发挥了主导作用。气候阻挠主义与保守主义和极右翼等意识形态之间存在联系;男权主义,父权世界观和工业男性主义,以及白人和排外意识形态。本研究以荷兰智库CLINTEL为例进行了研究,尽管该智库成立于2019年,但它成功地向欧洲议会成员提交了一份反对气候紧急情况的宣言,该宣言已由来自世界各地的气候行动反对者签署。本文基于Almiron et al.(2020)建立的类型学分析了该声明中存在的反向框架。此外,本研究对欧洲议会论坛上关于这一声明的讨论进行了性别话语分析,CLINTEL在那里会见了极右翼的荷兰政党范民主论坛(FvD)的成员,该论坛是欧洲保守党和改革派组织的一部分。对CLINTEL声明的研究表明,该智库使用的框架与其他欧洲否认主义智库相似。它的气候宣言有明显的性别偏见,签署国中男性的比例过高。这一点,连同对其与欧洲议会成员讨论的话语分析,是对新兴的工业男性主义和气候变化阻挠主义研究的贡献。本文提供了关于智库CLINTEL的信息,有助于填补荷兰气候变化应对运动的知识空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Androcentrism and conservatism within climate obstructionism. The case of the think tank CLINTEL in The Netherlands.
Within the climate countermovement, neoliberal think tanks have played a predominant role in both the United States and Europe. There are links between climate obstructionism and ideologies such as conservatism and the extreme right; androcentrism, patriarchal worldviews and industrial masculinities, and whiteness and xenosceptic ideologies. This research takes as a case study the Dutch think tank CLINTEL, which, despite having been founded in 2019, has managed to get a declaration against the climate emergency to members of the European Parliament, which has been signed by climate action contrarians from all over the world. This paper analyses the contrarian framings present in this declaration based on the typology established by Almiron et al. (2020). In addition, this research makes a gendered discursive analysis of the discussion about this statement in a forum of the European Parliament, where CLINTEL met with members of the far-right Dutch party Forum van Democratie (FvD), part of the European Conservatives and Reformists group. The study on CLINTEL's statement shows that the think tank uses similar frames as other European denialist think tanks. Its climate declaration has a significant gender bias, with an overwhelming over-representation of men among the signatories. This, together with the discursive analysis of its discussion with members of the European Parliament, is a contribution to the emerging line of research on industrial masculinities and climate change obstructionism. This paper provides information on the think tank CLINTEL, helping to fill a knowledge gap on the climate change countermovement in the Netherlands.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comunicación, salud y Covid-19. Cómo comunican los instagrammers sanitarios españoles. Instagram como objeto de estudio en investigaciones recientes. Una revisión de literatura con enfoque en revistas científicas. Emociones positivas y marketing social en el Facebook de las ONGDs. Deontología periodística en el tratamiento informativo del intento secesionista catalán. Medios de comunicación como agentes activos del conflicto: el caso de la Covid-19.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1