《精神卫生法》和《精神能力法》在综合医院的使用情况

Afia Ali, Ian Hall
{"title":"《精神卫生法》和《精神能力法》在综合医院的使用情况","authors":"Afia Ali,&nbsp;Ian Hall","doi":"10.1016/j.mppsy.2009.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article highlights the most important principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and some of the amendments to the Mental Health Act 1983 that are relevant to the general hospital setting. The article focuses on how capacity should be assessed and how best interest decisions for someone lacking capacity should be made. It also discusses the role of independent mental capacity advocates, advance decisions relating to refusal of treatment, the role of the Court of Protection, and the new deprivation of liberty safeguards that have been introduced to the Mental Capacity Act. Changes to the Mental Health Act that are likely to affect practice, such as changes to professional roles, are also discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88653,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry (Abingdon, England)","volume":"8 6","pages":"Pages 194-197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mppsy.2009.03.006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of the Mental Health Act and Mental Capacity Act in the general Hospital\",\"authors\":\"Afia Ali,&nbsp;Ian Hall\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mppsy.2009.03.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This article highlights the most important principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and some of the amendments to the Mental Health Act 1983 that are relevant to the general hospital setting. The article focuses on how capacity should be assessed and how best interest decisions for someone lacking capacity should be made. It also discusses the role of independent mental capacity advocates, advance decisions relating to refusal of treatment, the role of the Court of Protection, and the new deprivation of liberty safeguards that have been introduced to the Mental Capacity Act. Changes to the Mental Health Act that are likely to affect practice, such as changes to professional roles, are also discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatry (Abingdon, England)\",\"volume\":\"8 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 194-197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mppsy.2009.03.006\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatry (Abingdon, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1476179309000408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry (Abingdon, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1476179309000408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文强调了2005年《精神能力法》的最重要原则和1983年《精神卫生法》的一些与一般医院环境有关的修正案。本文重点讨论应该如何评估能力,以及应该如何为缺乏能力的人做出最有利的决策。它还讨论了独立精神能力倡导者的作用、与拒绝治疗有关的预先决定、保护法院的作用以及《精神能力法》中引入的新的剥夺自由保障措施。还讨论了可能影响实践的《精神卫生法》的变化,例如职业角色的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Use of the Mental Health Act and Mental Capacity Act in the general Hospital

This article highlights the most important principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and some of the amendments to the Mental Health Act 1983 that are relevant to the general hospital setting. The article focuses on how capacity should be assessed and how best interest decisions for someone lacking capacity should be made. It also discusses the role of independent mental capacity advocates, advance decisions relating to refusal of treatment, the role of the Court of Protection, and the new deprivation of liberty safeguards that have been introduced to the Mental Capacity Act. Changes to the Mental Health Act that are likely to affect practice, such as changes to professional roles, are also discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contents Editorial Board Mental illness, dangerousness and protecting society Personal autonomy and mental capacity The Mental Health Act and the Mental Capacity Act: untangling the relationship
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1