抽象摘要的推广以提高易用性和实用性

P. Makovhololo, F. Taylor, T. Iyamu
{"title":"抽象摘要的推广以提高易用性和实用性","authors":"P. Makovhololo, F. Taylor, T. Iyamu","doi":"10.1109/OI.2018.8535750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Even though the abstractive summarisation method has been in existence for over four decades, its popularity, adoption and diffusion have been slow, or limited, in both business and academic domains. This has retarded advances of the innovation and hampered its potential benefits to users. Thus, this qualitative, empirical study was undertaken to examine and understand how the abstractive summarisation method can be diffused to increase its spread and usefulness across business and academic environments. The 1995 theory of Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) by Rogers was employed in the analysis of the existing works. Based on analysis, five main factors were identified as influencing the adoption of the abstractive summarisation method. The factors are complexity, practical effectiveness, experimental, shortened output and lack of friendliness. These factors were discussed towards gaining a better understanding of how the diffusion of abstractive summarisation method can be improved in both business and academic environments.","PeriodicalId":331140,"journal":{"name":"2018 Open Innovations Conference (OI)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diffusion of Abstractive Summarisation to Improve Ease of Use and Usefulness\",\"authors\":\"P. Makovhololo, F. Taylor, T. Iyamu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/OI.2018.8535750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Even though the abstractive summarisation method has been in existence for over four decades, its popularity, adoption and diffusion have been slow, or limited, in both business and academic domains. This has retarded advances of the innovation and hampered its potential benefits to users. Thus, this qualitative, empirical study was undertaken to examine and understand how the abstractive summarisation method can be diffused to increase its spread and usefulness across business and academic environments. The 1995 theory of Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) by Rogers was employed in the analysis of the existing works. Based on analysis, five main factors were identified as influencing the adoption of the abstractive summarisation method. The factors are complexity, practical effectiveness, experimental, shortened output and lack of friendliness. These factors were discussed towards gaining a better understanding of how the diffusion of abstractive summarisation method can be improved in both business and academic environments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 Open Innovations Conference (OI)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 Open Innovations Conference (OI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/OI.2018.8535750\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Open Innovations Conference (OI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/OI.2018.8535750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管抽象总结方法已经存在了40多年,但在商业和学术领域,它的普及、采用和传播都是缓慢的,或者说是有限的。这阻碍了创新的发展,阻碍了它对用户的潜在好处。因此,这项定性的实证研究是为了检验和理解抽象总结方法如何在商业和学术环境中传播,以增加其传播和有用性。本文采用罗杰斯1995年提出的创新扩散理论(DOI)对已有文献进行分析。在分析的基础上,确定了影响抽象总结方法采用的五个主要因素。其影响因素主要有复杂性、实效性、实验性、输出时间短、缺乏友好性等。对这些因素进行了讨论,以便更好地理解如何在商业和学术环境中改进抽象摘要方法的传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diffusion of Abstractive Summarisation to Improve Ease of Use and Usefulness
Even though the abstractive summarisation method has been in existence for over four decades, its popularity, adoption and diffusion have been slow, or limited, in both business and academic domains. This has retarded advances of the innovation and hampered its potential benefits to users. Thus, this qualitative, empirical study was undertaken to examine and understand how the abstractive summarisation method can be diffused to increase its spread and usefulness across business and academic environments. The 1995 theory of Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) by Rogers was employed in the analysis of the existing works. Based on analysis, five main factors were identified as influencing the adoption of the abstractive summarisation method. The factors are complexity, practical effectiveness, experimental, shortened output and lack of friendliness. These factors were discussed towards gaining a better understanding of how the diffusion of abstractive summarisation method can be improved in both business and academic environments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adopting Dynamic Capabilities of Mobile Information and Communication Technology in Namibian Small and Medium Enterprises Digital Transformation of Enterprises: A Transition Using Process Modelling Antecedents An Adaptive Framework for Recommender-Based Learning Management Systems Resistive Switching Memory Effect and Conduction Mechanism in Nano-Silver Incorporated Type-A Gelatin Films Demand Side Management of Grid- Tied Hybrid Photovoltaic-Diesel-Battery Energy System for a University Engineering Building
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1