电动汽车使用情况综合指数

Arnab Sircar
{"title":"电动汽车使用情况综合指数","authors":"Arnab Sircar","doi":"10.1109/FUZZ45933.2021.9494524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focused on developing composite indices (CI) to determine the degree to which electric vehicles (EVs) may be adopted by consumers, manufacturers, and investors. These indices may be used as gauges of where resources should be allocated in the EV industry. The first step was to collect opinions from six experts who provided inputs as fuzzy numbers. They provided inputs on twelve different factors which were divided into three categories: Design and Manufacture, Performance and Efficiency, and Sustainability and Environment. The CIs were developed for each category. Using the fuzzy inputs, two different methods of aggregating the opinions were used: the first was the Agreement Matrix method (AM) which focused on the degree of agreement among the experts, and the second one was called the Normalized Defuzzification method (ND) that focused on the weights of various factors as well as a signal-to-noise ratio metric. In order to compare the CIs obtained from these methods, the idea of information loss was used. After performing the calculations, it was observed that the AM method had lower CI information losses for all three categories. A few extensions of this study are provided in the conclusion.","PeriodicalId":151289,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Composite Indices for Adoption of Electric Vehicles (EVs)\",\"authors\":\"Arnab Sircar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FUZZ45933.2021.9494524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study focused on developing composite indices (CI) to determine the degree to which electric vehicles (EVs) may be adopted by consumers, manufacturers, and investors. These indices may be used as gauges of where resources should be allocated in the EV industry. The first step was to collect opinions from six experts who provided inputs as fuzzy numbers. They provided inputs on twelve different factors which were divided into three categories: Design and Manufacture, Performance and Efficiency, and Sustainability and Environment. The CIs were developed for each category. Using the fuzzy inputs, two different methods of aggregating the opinions were used: the first was the Agreement Matrix method (AM) which focused on the degree of agreement among the experts, and the second one was called the Normalized Defuzzification method (ND) that focused on the weights of various factors as well as a signal-to-noise ratio metric. In order to compare the CIs obtained from these methods, the idea of information loss was used. After performing the calculations, it was observed that the AM method had lower CI information losses for all three categories. A few extensions of this study are provided in the conclusion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE)\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZ45933.2021.9494524\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZ45933.2021.9494524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的重点是开发复合指数(CI),以确定消费者、制造商和投资者对电动汽车(ev)的接受程度。这些指数可以用来衡量电动汽车行业的资源配置。第一步是收集六位专家的意见,他们以模糊数字的形式提供输入。他们就12个不同的因素提供了意见,这些因素分为三类:设计和制造、性能和效率、可持续发展和环境。为每个类别制定ci。利用模糊输入,采用了两种不同的意见聚合方法:第一种是关注专家之间的一致程度的协议矩阵法(AM),第二种是关注各种因素的权重以及信噪比度量的归一化去模糊化方法(ND)。为了比较这些方法得到的ci,我们使用了信息丢失的概念。在执行计算后,可以观察到AM方法在所有三类中都具有较低的CI信息损失。结语部分对本文的研究进行了拓展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Composite Indices for Adoption of Electric Vehicles (EVs)
This study focused on developing composite indices (CI) to determine the degree to which electric vehicles (EVs) may be adopted by consumers, manufacturers, and investors. These indices may be used as gauges of where resources should be allocated in the EV industry. The first step was to collect opinions from six experts who provided inputs as fuzzy numbers. They provided inputs on twelve different factors which were divided into three categories: Design and Manufacture, Performance and Efficiency, and Sustainability and Environment. The CIs were developed for each category. Using the fuzzy inputs, two different methods of aggregating the opinions were used: the first was the Agreement Matrix method (AM) which focused on the degree of agreement among the experts, and the second one was called the Normalized Defuzzification method (ND) that focused on the weights of various factors as well as a signal-to-noise ratio metric. In order to compare the CIs obtained from these methods, the idea of information loss was used. After performing the calculations, it was observed that the AM method had lower CI information losses for all three categories. A few extensions of this study are provided in the conclusion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
XAI Models for Quality of Experience Prediction in Wireless Networks Application of the Fuzzy Logic to Evaluation and Selection of Attribute Ranges in Machine Learning Kernel-Based k-Representatives Algorithm for Fuzzy Clustering of Categorical Data Necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of Atanassov's Intuitionistic Fuzzy based additive definite integral Identifying and Rectifying Rational Gaps in Fuzzy Rule Based Systems for Regression Problems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1