产业战略:神话还是现实

T. Durrani, S. Forbes
{"title":"产业战略:神话还是现实","authors":"T. Durrani, S. Forbes","doi":"10.1109/TEMSCON.2018.8488388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the new wave of policy changes being introduced under the umbrella of ‘industrial strategies' by governments in key industrialized countries, aimed at maintaining a competitive advantage in different industrial sectors; some brought about by change in circumstances, such as Brexit in the UK; others, for instance Industry 4.0 in Germany to maintain its lead in a raft of industry sectors, including the automotive industry; and Japan - as a vehicle to move out of a decade of stagnation; or in Canada, as a means exploiting Artificial Intelligence for enhancing industry progress, and way to support growth in Indigenous People. In other cases, as in the US, there is a denial that a country is pursuing a policy instrument that comprise an industrial strategy, and leaving it to industry to achieve success on its own Using the World Economic Forum Global Competitiveness Report 2016–2017 as a benchmark, a presentation will be made on the different approaches being taken by the UK, Germany, Canada, Japan and the US. This paper will then draw conclusions on the success, or otherwise, of the industry strategies being adopted by the different nations.","PeriodicalId":346867,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Industrial Strategy: Myth or Reality\",\"authors\":\"T. Durrani, S. Forbes\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TEMSCON.2018.8488388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores the new wave of policy changes being introduced under the umbrella of ‘industrial strategies' by governments in key industrialized countries, aimed at maintaining a competitive advantage in different industrial sectors; some brought about by change in circumstances, such as Brexit in the UK; others, for instance Industry 4.0 in Germany to maintain its lead in a raft of industry sectors, including the automotive industry; and Japan - as a vehicle to move out of a decade of stagnation; or in Canada, as a means exploiting Artificial Intelligence for enhancing industry progress, and way to support growth in Indigenous People. In other cases, as in the US, there is a denial that a country is pursuing a policy instrument that comprise an industrial strategy, and leaving it to industry to achieve success on its own Using the World Economic Forum Global Competitiveness Report 2016–2017 as a benchmark, a presentation will be made on the different approaches being taken by the UK, Germany, Canada, Japan and the US. This paper will then draw conclusions on the success, or otherwise, of the industry strategies being adopted by the different nations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON)\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMSCON.2018.8488388\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMSCON.2018.8488388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文探讨了主要工业化国家政府在“产业战略”的保护伞下引入的新一波政策变化,旨在保持不同工业部门的竞争优势;有些是环境变化造成的,比如英国脱欧;其他方面,例如德国的工业4.0,以保持其在包括汽车行业在内的一系列工业领域的领先地位;日本——作为摆脱十年停滞的工具;或在加拿大,作为利用人工智能促进产业进步的手段,以及支持土著人民增长的方式。在其他情况下,如在美国,有人否认一个国家正在推行一项包括工业战略的政策工具,并将其留给工业自己取得成功。以世界经济论坛2016-2017年全球竞争力报告为基准,将介绍英国、德国、加拿大、日本和美国正在采取的不同方法。本文将得出结论,对成功,或否则,由不同的国家正在采取的行业战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Industrial Strategy: Myth or Reality
This paper explores the new wave of policy changes being introduced under the umbrella of ‘industrial strategies' by governments in key industrialized countries, aimed at maintaining a competitive advantage in different industrial sectors; some brought about by change in circumstances, such as Brexit in the UK; others, for instance Industry 4.0 in Germany to maintain its lead in a raft of industry sectors, including the automotive industry; and Japan - as a vehicle to move out of a decade of stagnation; or in Canada, as a means exploiting Artificial Intelligence for enhancing industry progress, and way to support growth in Indigenous People. In other cases, as in the US, there is a denial that a country is pursuing a policy instrument that comprise an industrial strategy, and leaving it to industry to achieve success on its own Using the World Economic Forum Global Competitiveness Report 2016–2017 as a benchmark, a presentation will be made on the different approaches being taken by the UK, Germany, Canada, Japan and the US. This paper will then draw conclusions on the success, or otherwise, of the industry strategies being adopted by the different nations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards Team Formation Using Belbin Role Types and a Social Networks Analysis Approach The national culture effect: Trust at Saudi Arabian petrochemical engineering firms Poverty Entrepreneurs and Technology Areas to Watch During a M&A Transaction Derivation of Quaternary-Based Mathematical Operators to Manage Innovation in Complex Adaptive Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1