资金分散和教育不平等

W. Vermeulen
{"title":"资金分散和教育不平等","authors":"W. Vermeulen","doi":"10.1787/9789264302488-7-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores the link between the decentralisation of education funding to the local level and inequality in outcomes. In most countries, autonomous local taxes fund, at most, a small share of education expenses. They play a significant role, however, in a few Nordic countries and in Switzerland. The economic literature suggests that local funding makes educational systems more efficient at the expense of equity. However, inequality is not systematically larger in more decentralised countries. This finding does not appear to be driven by differences in socio-economic homogeneity, but rather by a range of policies that mitigate or offset any adverse impact. Some of these policies may still bear an equityefficiency trade-off.","PeriodicalId":350343,"journal":{"name":"OECD Fiscal Federalism Studies","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decentralised funding and inequality in education\",\"authors\":\"W. Vermeulen\",\"doi\":\"10.1787/9789264302488-7-en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter explores the link between the decentralisation of education funding to the local level and inequality in outcomes. In most countries, autonomous local taxes fund, at most, a small share of education expenses. They play a significant role, however, in a few Nordic countries and in Switzerland. The economic literature suggests that local funding makes educational systems more efficient at the expense of equity. However, inequality is not systematically larger in more decentralised countries. This finding does not appear to be driven by differences in socio-economic homogeneity, but rather by a range of policies that mitigate or offset any adverse impact. Some of these policies may still bear an equityefficiency trade-off.\",\"PeriodicalId\":350343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OECD Fiscal Federalism Studies\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OECD Fiscal Federalism Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264302488-7-en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OECD Fiscal Federalism Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264302488-7-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本章探讨了将教育经费下放到地方一级与结果不平等之间的联系。在大多数国家,自治的地方税收最多只能资助教育费用的一小部分。然而,它们在少数北欧国家和瑞士发挥了重要作用。经济学文献表明,地方资助以牺牲公平为代价提高了教育系统的效率。然而,在权力更分散的国家,不平等现象并不会系统性地更大。这一发现似乎不是由社会经济同质性的差异造成的,而是由减轻或抵消任何不利影响的一系列政策造成的。其中一些政策可能仍然需要权衡公平效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Decentralised funding and inequality in education
This chapter explores the link between the decentralisation of education funding to the local level and inequality in outcomes. In most countries, autonomous local taxes fund, at most, a small share of education expenses. They play a significant role, however, in a few Nordic countries and in Switzerland. The economic literature suggests that local funding makes educational systems more efficient at the expense of equity. However, inequality is not systematically larger in more decentralised countries. This finding does not appear to be driven by differences in socio-economic homogeneity, but rather by a range of policies that mitigate or offset any adverse impact. Some of these policies may still bear an equityefficiency trade-off.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Making Property Tax Reform Happen in China Executive summary Local Public Finance and Capacity Building in Asia Ageing and productivity growth in OECD regions: Combatting the economic impact of ageing through productivity growth? Managing across levels of government: The challenge of pension reform in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1