多准则决策:作为软目标类别之一的文化事件风险分析

Dora Kotkova, L. Kralik, Lukas Kotek
{"title":"多准则决策:作为软目标类别之一的文化事件风险分析","authors":"Dora Kotkova, L. Kralik, Lukas Kotek","doi":"10.1109/ICCST49569.2021.9717382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is focused on risk analysis with the help of multi-criteria decision making. We create many risk analyses for Soft targets, and we continually try to find new methods for objective evaluation of the risks. Many risk analyses are subjective, which is a problem for planning security measures and comparing the results (other events, object, place etc.). In this article, we pre-sent our case study, which deals with the utilization of fuzzy TOPSIS. We have chosen one cate-gory of the Soft targets - the cultural events. Our goal was to find the most endangered localization for the violent attacks in the cultural event selected - musical concert. Then we started to cooperate with three experts. They filled in data in our risk analysis, and then we compared the results with practice. We have chosen fuzzy TOPSIS because we assumed this method would be more objective. In the end, this hypothesis has confirmed. The results were objectively and in line with practice.","PeriodicalId":101539,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiple Criteria Decision-making: Risk Analyses for Cultural Events as one of the Soft Target Categories\",\"authors\":\"Dora Kotkova, L. Kralik, Lukas Kotek\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCST49569.2021.9717382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article is focused on risk analysis with the help of multi-criteria decision making. We create many risk analyses for Soft targets, and we continually try to find new methods for objective evaluation of the risks. Many risk analyses are subjective, which is a problem for planning security measures and comparing the results (other events, object, place etc.). In this article, we pre-sent our case study, which deals with the utilization of fuzzy TOPSIS. We have chosen one cate-gory of the Soft targets - the cultural events. Our goal was to find the most endangered localization for the violent attacks in the cultural event selected - musical concert. Then we started to cooperate with three experts. They filled in data in our risk analysis, and then we compared the results with practice. We have chosen fuzzy TOPSIS because we assumed this method would be more objective. In the end, this hypothesis has confirmed. The results were objectively and in line with practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":101539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCST49569.2021.9717382\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCST49569.2021.9717382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文主要研究多准则决策下的风险分析。我们为软目标创建了许多风险分析,并不断尝试寻找客观评估风险的新方法。许多风险分析都是主观的,这对于规划安全措施和比较结果(其他事件、对象、地点等)来说是一个问题。在本文中,我们提出了一个案例研究,该研究涉及模糊TOPSIS的应用。我们选择了一类软目标——文化活动。我们的目标是在选择的文化活动中找到暴力袭击最危险的本地化-音乐会。然后我们开始与三位专家合作。他们在我们的风险分析中填写数据,然后我们将结果与实践进行比较。我们选择模糊TOPSIS是因为我们认为这种方法会更客观。最后,这一假设得到了证实。结果客观、符合实际。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multiple Criteria Decision-making: Risk Analyses for Cultural Events as one of the Soft Target Categories
This article is focused on risk analysis with the help of multi-criteria decision making. We create many risk analyses for Soft targets, and we continually try to find new methods for objective evaluation of the risks. Many risk analyses are subjective, which is a problem for planning security measures and comparing the results (other events, object, place etc.). In this article, we pre-sent our case study, which deals with the utilization of fuzzy TOPSIS. We have chosen one cate-gory of the Soft targets - the cultural events. Our goal was to find the most endangered localization for the violent attacks in the cultural event selected - musical concert. Then we started to cooperate with three experts. They filled in data in our risk analysis, and then we compared the results with practice. We have chosen fuzzy TOPSIS because we assumed this method would be more objective. In the end, this hypothesis has confirmed. The results were objectively and in line with practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emotional analysis of safeness and risk perception of London and Rome railway stations during the COVID-19 pandemic Assessment of Foreign Trailer Number Plates on UK Roads, Implications for ANPR Evaluation of Electrocardiogram Biometric Verification Models Based on Short Enrollment Time on Medical and Wearable Recorders Emotional reactions to risk perception in the Herculaneum Archaeological Park Face Masks Usage Monitoring for Public Health Security using Computer Vision on Hardware
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1