结合实验作为亲和力异质性测定的分辨率限制分析

Charles Delisi, Ajit K. Thakur
{"title":"结合实验作为亲和力异质性测定的分辨率限制分析","authors":"Charles Delisi,&nbsp;Ajit K. Thakur","doi":"10.1016/0161-5890(78)90136-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An analysis is presented of the limits of resolution of Scatchard and Sips plots as methods for detecting affinity heterogeneity in receptor populations. We estimate using statistical criteria for defining resolution that Scatchard plots can resolve two groups present at equal concentration, provided they differ by more than a factor of about six in affinity, and that resolution drops rapidly as the concentration difference between the groups increases. In addition, because of the non linear relation between affinity and free energy, and because the Sips analysis must necessarily be formulated in terms of free energies, the Scatchard plot is the more sensitive of the two methods for detecting heterogeneity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13265,"journal":{"name":"Immunochemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1978-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0161-5890(78)90136-0","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An analysis of the limits of resolution of binding experiments as assays for affinity heterogeneity\",\"authors\":\"Charles Delisi,&nbsp;Ajit K. Thakur\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0161-5890(78)90136-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>An analysis is presented of the limits of resolution of Scatchard and Sips plots as methods for detecting affinity heterogeneity in receptor populations. We estimate using statistical criteria for defining resolution that Scatchard plots can resolve two groups present at equal concentration, provided they differ by more than a factor of about six in affinity, and that resolution drops rapidly as the concentration difference between the groups increases. In addition, because of the non linear relation between affinity and free energy, and because the Sips analysis must necessarily be formulated in terms of free energies, the Scatchard plot is the more sensitive of the two methods for detecting heterogeneity.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Immunochemistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1978-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0161-5890(78)90136-0\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Immunochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0161589078901360\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0161589078901360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

分析了Scatchard和Sips图作为检测受体群体亲和异质性的方法的分辨率限制。我们使用定义分辨率的统计标准估计,Scatchard图可以解析两个浓度相等的组,只要它们的亲和度相差超过6倍,并且随着组间浓度差异的增加,分辨率会迅速下降。此外,由于亲和和自由能之间的非线性关系,并且由于Sips分析必须用自由能表示,因此Scatchard图是两种检测异质性的方法中更敏感的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An analysis of the limits of resolution of binding experiments as assays for affinity heterogeneity

An analysis is presented of the limits of resolution of Scatchard and Sips plots as methods for detecting affinity heterogeneity in receptor populations. We estimate using statistical criteria for defining resolution that Scatchard plots can resolve two groups present at equal concentration, provided they differ by more than a factor of about six in affinity, and that resolution drops rapidly as the concentration difference between the groups increases. In addition, because of the non linear relation between affinity and free energy, and because the Sips analysis must necessarily be formulated in terms of free energies, the Scatchard plot is the more sensitive of the two methods for detecting heterogeneity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Induction of anti-phosphorylcholine antibodies of restricted heterogeneity in rabbits Preparation of an active Fd fragment by cyanogen bromide cleavage of an IgG heavy chain from a homogeneous rabbit antibody Precise determination of the entire antigenic structure of lysozyme: Molecular features of protein antigenic structures and potential of ‘surface-simulation’ synthesis—a powerful new concept for protein binding sites Immunogenicity of glutaraldehyde treated homologous monomeric albumin in rabbits Formation of non-covalently linked IgM polymers: Dependence on the protein sulfhydryl groups and zinc ions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1