{"title":"社会经济发展中的参与式ICT设计","authors":"Linus Kendall, A. Dearden","doi":"10.1145/3210586.3210596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Participatory design in socioeconomic development is an invariably political activity fraught with both political as well as ethical entanglements. ICT for development (ICTD) - often involved in contexts of great inequality and heteogeneity - places these in especially sharp relief. This paper draws attention to these entanglements as well as what they mean for the role and practice of designer-researchers practicing PD. We then draw upon our experiences in an active PD project to highlight approaches that serve as a partial response to these entanglements. These presents both limitations as well as orientations for our role as designer-researchers in engaging with and organising PD work in ICTD - providing a starting point for answering the question \"who participates with whom in what and why?\"","PeriodicalId":210718,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disentangling participatory ICT design in socioeconomic development\",\"authors\":\"Linus Kendall, A. Dearden\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3210586.3210596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Participatory design in socioeconomic development is an invariably political activity fraught with both political as well as ethical entanglements. ICT for development (ICTD) - often involved in contexts of great inequality and heteogeneity - places these in especially sharp relief. This paper draws attention to these entanglements as well as what they mean for the role and practice of designer-researchers practicing PD. We then draw upon our experiences in an active PD project to highlight approaches that serve as a partial response to these entanglements. These presents both limitations as well as orientations for our role as designer-researchers in engaging with and organising PD work in ICTD - providing a starting point for answering the question \\\"who participates with whom in what and why?\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":210718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3210586.3210596\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3210586.3210596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
摘要
社会经济发展中的参与式设计始终是一种政治活动,充满了政治和伦理的纠缠。信息和通信技术促进发展(ICT for development, ICTD)往往涉及严重不平等和异质性的背景,这使这些问题得到了特别明显的缓解。本文将关注这些纠缠,以及它们对实践PD的设计师研究人员的角色和实践意味着什么。然后,我们利用我们在一个活跃的PD项目中的经验来强调作为这些纠缠的部分响应的方法。这既表明了我们作为设计师和研究人员参与和组织ICTD的PD工作的局限性,也表明了我们的方向——为回答“谁和谁一起参与什么以及为什么?”这个问题提供了一个起点。
Disentangling participatory ICT design in socioeconomic development
Participatory design in socioeconomic development is an invariably political activity fraught with both political as well as ethical entanglements. ICT for development (ICTD) - often involved in contexts of great inequality and heteogeneity - places these in especially sharp relief. This paper draws attention to these entanglements as well as what they mean for the role and practice of designer-researchers practicing PD. We then draw upon our experiences in an active PD project to highlight approaches that serve as a partial response to these entanglements. These presents both limitations as well as orientations for our role as designer-researchers in engaging with and organising PD work in ICTD - providing a starting point for answering the question "who participates with whom in what and why?"