基于地形信息分辨率与网格尺寸差异的泥石流数值模拟对比分析

Namgyun Kim, Byong-Woon Jun
{"title":"基于地形信息分辨率与网格尺寸差异的泥石流数值模拟对比分析","authors":"Namgyun Kim, Byong-Woon Jun","doi":"10.9798/kosham.2023.23.2.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, a comparative analysis was conducted for the debris flow that occurred in Gokseong-gun, Jeollanam-do, in August 2020, using the difference between the resolution of topographic information and grid size. High-resolution topographic information (0.03 m) was established through photogrammetry. For comparison, the low-resolution topographic information was obtained from the contour lines of the 1:5000 digital map. The topographic information was depicted as a grid, with resolutions of 1, 5, and 10 m, and analyzed by setting the simulation grid size to 1, 5, and 10 m. According to the topographic resolution, no significant difference was obtained in the numerical simulation results, when high-resolution topographic information from UAV photogrammetry was used, and the analysis was similar to the actual debris flow. Additionally, when the size of the analysis grid for the simulation was 10 m, the simulation was very similar to the actual debris-flow situation. For predicting a risk area using a debris-flow model, it is very important to reflect actual information, such as topography, geology, and rainfall; technical parameters, such as the grid size, are also important. Moreover, determining the optimal grid size by considering the conditions of the study area, such as the basin area, is necessary.","PeriodicalId":416980,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation","volume":"16 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Debris Flow Numerical Simulation Based on the Difference between the Resolution of Topographic Information and Grid Size\",\"authors\":\"Namgyun Kim, Byong-Woon Jun\",\"doi\":\"10.9798/kosham.2023.23.2.41\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, a comparative analysis was conducted for the debris flow that occurred in Gokseong-gun, Jeollanam-do, in August 2020, using the difference between the resolution of topographic information and grid size. High-resolution topographic information (0.03 m) was established through photogrammetry. For comparison, the low-resolution topographic information was obtained from the contour lines of the 1:5000 digital map. The topographic information was depicted as a grid, with resolutions of 1, 5, and 10 m, and analyzed by setting the simulation grid size to 1, 5, and 10 m. According to the topographic resolution, no significant difference was obtained in the numerical simulation results, when high-resolution topographic information from UAV photogrammetry was used, and the analysis was similar to the actual debris flow. Additionally, when the size of the analysis grid for the simulation was 10 m, the simulation was very similar to the actual debris-flow situation. For predicting a risk area using a debris-flow model, it is very important to reflect actual information, such as topography, geology, and rainfall; technical parameters, such as the grid size, are also important. Moreover, determining the optimal grid size by considering the conditions of the study area, such as the basin area, is necessary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":416980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation\",\"volume\":\"16 9\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9798/kosham.2023.23.2.41\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9798/kosham.2023.23.2.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究以2020年8月在全罗南道谷城郡发生的泥石流为对象,利用地形信息分辨率和网格大小的差异进行了对比分析。通过摄影测量建立高分辨率地形信息(0.03 m)。作为对比,低分辨率地形信息来源于1:50 000数字地图的等高线。地形信息以分辨率分别为1、5、10 m的网格表示,通过设置模拟网格尺寸为1、5、10 m进行分析。根据地形分辨率,采用无人机摄影测量的高分辨率地形信息,数值模拟结果无显著差异,分析结果与实际泥石流相似。此外,当模拟的分析网格尺寸为10 m时,模拟与实际泥石流情况非常相似。为了使用泥石流模型预测危险区,反映地形、地质和降雨等实际信息非常重要;技术参数,如网格大小,也很重要。此外,考虑研究区域的条件,如盆地面积,确定最优网格尺寸是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Analysis of Debris Flow Numerical Simulation Based on the Difference between the Resolution of Topographic Information and Grid Size
In this study, a comparative analysis was conducted for the debris flow that occurred in Gokseong-gun, Jeollanam-do, in August 2020, using the difference between the resolution of topographic information and grid size. High-resolution topographic information (0.03 m) was established through photogrammetry. For comparison, the low-resolution topographic information was obtained from the contour lines of the 1:5000 digital map. The topographic information was depicted as a grid, with resolutions of 1, 5, and 10 m, and analyzed by setting the simulation grid size to 1, 5, and 10 m. According to the topographic resolution, no significant difference was obtained in the numerical simulation results, when high-resolution topographic information from UAV photogrammetry was used, and the analysis was similar to the actual debris flow. Additionally, when the size of the analysis grid for the simulation was 10 m, the simulation was very similar to the actual debris-flow situation. For predicting a risk area using a debris-flow model, it is very important to reflect actual information, such as topography, geology, and rainfall; technical parameters, such as the grid size, are also important. Moreover, determining the optimal grid size by considering the conditions of the study area, such as the basin area, is necessary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study on the Statistical Analysis and Artificial Intelligence Model to Improve the Reliability of Safety Inspection Prediction of the DO Factor at Bugok Bridge, Oncheoncheon, Using Deep Learning Impact of Disaster on Household Expenditures Using a Difference-in-Difference Analysis Occupant Load Factor Calculation in Neighborhood Living Facilities while Performance-Based Design A Study on Establishing Procedures and Display Design for the Development of the Disaster Management System using Satellite Imagery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1