10%硝酸、Edta和10%甲酸对牙齿脱钙效果的比较

Nitish Bhat, K. Thakur, Nandini Bharadwaj, Ramandeep Singh
{"title":"10%硝酸、Edta和10%甲酸对牙齿脱钙效果的比较","authors":"Nitish Bhat, K. Thakur, Nandini Bharadwaj, Ramandeep Singh","doi":"10.5530/AMDHS.2019.2.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decalcification of hard tissues has remained an important part in visualizing the histology of the section. For the process of decalcification various decalcifying agents have been used in the past but very limited studies can be found in the literature about the comparison of various decalcifying agents. Aim: Here we present a study comparing three different decalcifying agents (10% Nitric acid, EDTA, 10 % Formic acid). Methodology: 30 freshly extracted premolars were decalcified using three different decalcifying agents. The end point of decalcification was tested by chemical methods. The decalcified sections were routinely processed and staining was done using Hematoxylin and Eosin. Result: Sections decalcified with EDTA gave better results as compared to the other two groups. Conclusion: EDTA is a better option for decalcification of tooth but it has a slow rate of action. So, for the cases requiring urgent results nitric acid can be used.","PeriodicalId":237766,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical, Dental and Health Sciences","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparision of 10% Nitric Acid, Edta and 10% Formic Acid for Tooth Decalcification\",\"authors\":\"Nitish Bhat, K. Thakur, Nandini Bharadwaj, Ramandeep Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.5530/AMDHS.2019.2.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Decalcification of hard tissues has remained an important part in visualizing the histology of the section. For the process of decalcification various decalcifying agents have been used in the past but very limited studies can be found in the literature about the comparison of various decalcifying agents. Aim: Here we present a study comparing three different decalcifying agents (10% Nitric acid, EDTA, 10 % Formic acid). Methodology: 30 freshly extracted premolars were decalcified using three different decalcifying agents. The end point of decalcification was tested by chemical methods. The decalcified sections were routinely processed and staining was done using Hematoxylin and Eosin. Result: Sections decalcified with EDTA gave better results as compared to the other two groups. Conclusion: EDTA is a better option for decalcification of tooth but it has a slow rate of action. So, for the cases requiring urgent results nitric acid can be used.\",\"PeriodicalId\":237766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Medical, Dental and Health Sciences\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Medical, Dental and Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5530/AMDHS.2019.2.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical, Dental and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5530/AMDHS.2019.2.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

硬组织的脱钙仍然是可视化切片组织学的重要组成部分。对于脱钙过程,过去已经使用了各种脱钙剂,但文献中对各种脱钙剂的比较研究非常有限。目的:本研究比较了三种不同的脱钙剂(10%硝酸、EDTA、10%甲酸)。方法:采用三种不同的脱钙剂对30颗新拔牙进行脱钙。用化学方法测定了脱钙终点。脱钙切片常规处理,苏木精和伊红染色。结果:EDTA脱钙切片效果优于其他两组。结论:EDTA是治疗牙齿脱钙的较好选择,但作用速度慢。因此,对于需要紧急结果的病例,可以使用硝酸。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparision of 10% Nitric Acid, Edta and 10% Formic Acid for Tooth Decalcification
Decalcification of hard tissues has remained an important part in visualizing the histology of the section. For the process of decalcification various decalcifying agents have been used in the past but very limited studies can be found in the literature about the comparison of various decalcifying agents. Aim: Here we present a study comparing three different decalcifying agents (10% Nitric acid, EDTA, 10 % Formic acid). Methodology: 30 freshly extracted premolars were decalcified using three different decalcifying agents. The end point of decalcification was tested by chemical methods. The decalcified sections were routinely processed and staining was done using Hematoxylin and Eosin. Result: Sections decalcified with EDTA gave better results as compared to the other two groups. Conclusion: EDTA is a better option for decalcification of tooth but it has a slow rate of action. So, for the cases requiring urgent results nitric acid can be used.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does the Health Assessment Questionnaire have Potential as a Monitoring Tool for Cohorts with Arthritis in Quetta, Pakistan? A Case Report on Injection Site Abscess Due to Staphylococcus epidermidis Role of Micro and Macro Nutrients in Malnourished Children Attending Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), Divisional Head Quarter Hospital, Dera Murad Jamali, Balochistan Awareness of COVID-19 among Pharmacy Students of Pakistan Case Report on the Management of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) Postpartum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1