{"title":"混响室插入损耗测量的时频差异","authors":"Hong Lei, S. Bowen, Zhou Zhongyuan, Zhou Xiang","doi":"10.1109/CEEM.2015.7368651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Differences in the insertion loss of a reverberation chamber as measured in frequency & time domain are shown. And an alternative approach for measuring the insertion loss which is named as time domain energy-decay method is proposed, and compared with conventional time domain time-decay method & frequency domain continuous wave based method. Insertion loss measured by time domain energy-decay method is identical to that which would be obtained in frequency domain. The insertion loss determined by time-decay method is 1~2dB greater than those obtained with frequency domain measurement, the main reason for the discrepancy is the influence of antenna (antenna impedance mismatch and non-unit antenna efficiency). The effectiveness of the time domain method for measuring the insertion loss of a reverberation chamber is of particular interest in this paper.","PeriodicalId":442379,"journal":{"name":"2015 7th Asia-Pacific Conference on Environmental Electromagnetics (CEEM)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in reverberation chamber insertion loss measurement in time & frequency domian\",\"authors\":\"Hong Lei, S. Bowen, Zhou Zhongyuan, Zhou Xiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CEEM.2015.7368651\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Differences in the insertion loss of a reverberation chamber as measured in frequency & time domain are shown. And an alternative approach for measuring the insertion loss which is named as time domain energy-decay method is proposed, and compared with conventional time domain time-decay method & frequency domain continuous wave based method. Insertion loss measured by time domain energy-decay method is identical to that which would be obtained in frequency domain. The insertion loss determined by time-decay method is 1~2dB greater than those obtained with frequency domain measurement, the main reason for the discrepancy is the influence of antenna (antenna impedance mismatch and non-unit antenna efficiency). The effectiveness of the time domain method for measuring the insertion loss of a reverberation chamber is of particular interest in this paper.\",\"PeriodicalId\":442379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 7th Asia-Pacific Conference on Environmental Electromagnetics (CEEM)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 7th Asia-Pacific Conference on Environmental Electromagnetics (CEEM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEEM.2015.7368651\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 7th Asia-Pacific Conference on Environmental Electromagnetics (CEEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEEM.2015.7368651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Differences in reverberation chamber insertion loss measurement in time & frequency domian
Differences in the insertion loss of a reverberation chamber as measured in frequency & time domain are shown. And an alternative approach for measuring the insertion loss which is named as time domain energy-decay method is proposed, and compared with conventional time domain time-decay method & frequency domain continuous wave based method. Insertion loss measured by time domain energy-decay method is identical to that which would be obtained in frequency domain. The insertion loss determined by time-decay method is 1~2dB greater than those obtained with frequency domain measurement, the main reason for the discrepancy is the influence of antenna (antenna impedance mismatch and non-unit antenna efficiency). The effectiveness of the time domain method for measuring the insertion loss of a reverberation chamber is of particular interest in this paper.