非线性和线性多接收机检测系统的比较

W. Lindsey
{"title":"非线性和线性多接收机检测系统的比较","authors":"W. Lindsey","doi":"10.1109/TSET.1964.4335586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Detection of a binary transmission by both optimum and suboptimum nonlinear and linear multireceivers is considered by comparing their asymptotic performance characteristics. The multichannel model is presumed to be of the Rician type. Particularly, we consider Turin's nonlinear specular-coherent multi-receiver and the nonlinear noncoherent Pierce-Stein multireceiver. These two termination error rate characteristics are graphically compared for low and high output signal-to-noise ratios. The performance characteristics of two other coherent linear multireceivers, one optimum and one easier implemented suboptimum, are derived and compared with the above-mentioned nonlinear multireceivers. The numerical results indicate system design trends and provide information on the degradation or improvement afforded by employing nonlinear detection systems as compared with linear detection systems. In particular, the optimum nonlinear coherent multireceiver is difficult to implement. It is shown that, for multichannels which are largely specular in nature, a more easily implemented linear coherent unit behaves optimally for all practical purposes. For channels which are largely scatter in nature it is shown that the linearized suboptimum system performance is highly inferior to the corresponding optimum coherent unit. In these situations, the noncoherent \"square-law combining\" system would be more reliable than the suboptimum coherent unit. In fact, for large scatter components we find that the noncoherent unit performs almost identically to the nonlinear coherent unit. This is due to the signal suppression effects known to occur in all nonlinear detectors throughout the field of statistical detection theory.","PeriodicalId":153922,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Space Electronics and Telemetry","volume":"158 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1964-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Nonlinear and Linear Multireceiver Detection Systems\",\"authors\":\"W. Lindsey\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TSET.1964.4335586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Detection of a binary transmission by both optimum and suboptimum nonlinear and linear multireceivers is considered by comparing their asymptotic performance characteristics. The multichannel model is presumed to be of the Rician type. Particularly, we consider Turin's nonlinear specular-coherent multi-receiver and the nonlinear noncoherent Pierce-Stein multireceiver. These two termination error rate characteristics are graphically compared for low and high output signal-to-noise ratios. The performance characteristics of two other coherent linear multireceivers, one optimum and one easier implemented suboptimum, are derived and compared with the above-mentioned nonlinear multireceivers. The numerical results indicate system design trends and provide information on the degradation or improvement afforded by employing nonlinear detection systems as compared with linear detection systems. In particular, the optimum nonlinear coherent multireceiver is difficult to implement. It is shown that, for multichannels which are largely specular in nature, a more easily implemented linear coherent unit behaves optimally for all practical purposes. For channels which are largely scatter in nature it is shown that the linearized suboptimum system performance is highly inferior to the corresponding optimum coherent unit. In these situations, the noncoherent \\\"square-law combining\\\" system would be more reliable than the suboptimum coherent unit. In fact, for large scatter components we find that the noncoherent unit performs almost identically to the nonlinear coherent unit. This is due to the signal suppression effects known to occur in all nonlinear detectors throughout the field of statistical detection theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Space Electronics and Telemetry\",\"volume\":\"158 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1964-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Space Electronics and Telemetry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TSET.1964.4335586\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Space Electronics and Telemetry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TSET.1964.4335586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

通过比较最优和次最优非线性和线性多接收机的渐近性能特征,考虑了它们对二进制传输的检测。假定多渠道模型是一种专家模型。特别地,我们考虑了都灵非线性镜面相干多接收机和非线性非相干皮尔斯-斯坦多接收机。这两种终止误码率特性在低和高输出信噪比下进行了图形比较。推导了另外两种相干线性多接收机的性能特性,其中一种是最优的,另一种是较易实现的次优的,并与上述非线性多接收机进行了比较。数值结果表明了系统设计趋势,并提供了与线性检测系统相比,采用非线性检测系统所提供的退化或改进信息。特别是最优非线性相干多接收机难以实现。结果表明,对于本质上主要是镜面的多通道,更容易实现的线性相干单元在所有实际用途中表现最佳。对于本质上很大程度上是散射的信道,线性化的次优系统性能远不如相应的最佳相干单元。在这些情况下,非相干“平方律组合”系统将比次优相干单元更可靠。事实上,对于大散射分量,我们发现非相干单元的性能与非线性相干单元几乎相同。这是由于在整个统计检测理论领域中,所有非线性检测器都存在已知的信号抑制效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Nonlinear and Linear Multireceiver Detection Systems
Detection of a binary transmission by both optimum and suboptimum nonlinear and linear multireceivers is considered by comparing their asymptotic performance characteristics. The multichannel model is presumed to be of the Rician type. Particularly, we consider Turin's nonlinear specular-coherent multi-receiver and the nonlinear noncoherent Pierce-Stein multireceiver. These two termination error rate characteristics are graphically compared for low and high output signal-to-noise ratios. The performance characteristics of two other coherent linear multireceivers, one optimum and one easier implemented suboptimum, are derived and compared with the above-mentioned nonlinear multireceivers. The numerical results indicate system design trends and provide information on the degradation or improvement afforded by employing nonlinear detection systems as compared with linear detection systems. In particular, the optimum nonlinear coherent multireceiver is difficult to implement. It is shown that, for multichannels which are largely specular in nature, a more easily implemented linear coherent unit behaves optimally for all practical purposes. For channels which are largely scatter in nature it is shown that the linearized suboptimum system performance is highly inferior to the corresponding optimum coherent unit. In these situations, the noncoherent "square-law combining" system would be more reliable than the suboptimum coherent unit. In fact, for large scatter components we find that the noncoherent unit performs almost identically to the nonlinear coherent unit. This is due to the signal suppression effects known to occur in all nonlinear detectors throughout the field of statistical detection theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Precision Planetary Range-Tracking Radar Optimum Filters for Second- and Third-Order Phase-Locked Loops by an Error-Function Criterion Power Spectrum of PAM/FM and PAM/PM Power Spectrum of a Random PCM-FM Wave Unambiguous Accuracy of an Interferometer Angle-Measuring System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1