辩护之死:衍生品如何终结对企业破产中欺诈性转让行为的善意辩护

C. Hall
{"title":"辩护之死:衍生品如何终结对企业破产中欺诈性转让行为的善意辩护","authors":"C. Hall","doi":"10.15779/Z38ZG52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the \"good faith defense\" to fraudulent transfer actions in bankruptcy. It argues that investors who have hedged their equity interest in an investment will always qualify as good faith transferees, and thus will be effectively immune from the Bankruptcy Code's fraudulent transfer provisions. It then argues that permitting such arbitrary application of the provisions will increase the cost of capital for solvent firms, a result the Bankruptcy Code is designed to avoid. It concludes that one workable solution to this problem is to eliminate the good faith defense altogether in the context of business bankruptcies. The Death of a Defense","PeriodicalId":326069,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley Business Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Death of a Defense: How Derivatives Spell the End of the Good Faith Defense to Fraudulent Transfer Actions in Business Bankruptcies\",\"authors\":\"C. Hall\",\"doi\":\"10.15779/Z38ZG52\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the \\\"good faith defense\\\" to fraudulent transfer actions in bankruptcy. It argues that investors who have hedged their equity interest in an investment will always qualify as good faith transferees, and thus will be effectively immune from the Bankruptcy Code's fraudulent transfer provisions. It then argues that permitting such arbitrary application of the provisions will increase the cost of capital for solvent firms, a result the Bankruptcy Code is designed to avoid. It concludes that one workable solution to this problem is to eliminate the good faith defense altogether in the context of business bankruptcies. The Death of a Defense\",\"PeriodicalId\":326069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Berkeley Business Law Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Berkeley Business Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38ZG52\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley Business Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38ZG52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了破产欺诈转让诉讼中的“善意抗辩”问题。它认为,对冲了投资股权的投资者将始终符合善意受让人的资格,因此将有效地免于破产法的欺诈性转让条款。然后,它辩称,允许这些条款的任意适用将增加有偿债能力的公司的资本成本,这是《破产法》旨在避免的结果。它的结论是,解决这个问题的一个可行的办法是在企业破产的背景下完全取消诚信辩护。辩护人的死亡
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Death of a Defense: How Derivatives Spell the End of the Good Faith Defense to Fraudulent Transfer Actions in Business Bankruptcies
This article examines the "good faith defense" to fraudulent transfer actions in bankruptcy. It argues that investors who have hedged their equity interest in an investment will always qualify as good faith transferees, and thus will be effectively immune from the Bankruptcy Code's fraudulent transfer provisions. It then argues that permitting such arbitrary application of the provisions will increase the cost of capital for solvent firms, a result the Bankruptcy Code is designed to avoid. It concludes that one workable solution to this problem is to eliminate the good faith defense altogether in the context of business bankruptcies. The Death of a Defense
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Social Responsibility of Business Is Not Social Responsibility: Assume That There Are No Angels and Allow the Free Market's Touch of Heaven Piercing the Corporate Veil: Historical, Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives Effectively Discharging Fiduciary Duties in IP-Rich M&A Transactions The Enigma of Hostile Takeovers in Japan: Bidder Beware National Security Review in Foreign Investments: A Comparative and Critical Assessment on China and U.S. Laws and Practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1