无线Mesh网络中基于fec的可靠组播方案

Dimitrios Koutsonikolas, Y. C. Hu
{"title":"无线Mesh网络中基于fec的可靠组播方案","authors":"Dimitrios Koutsonikolas, Y. C. Hu","doi":"10.1109/DSN.2007.92","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many important applications in wireless mesh networks require reliable multicast communication. Previously, forward error correction (FEC) techniques have been proved successful for providing reliability in the Internet, as they avoid the control packet implosion and scalability problems of ARQ-based protocols. In this paper, we examine if FEC can be equally efficient wireless mesh networks. We implement four reliable schemes initially proposed for wired networks on top of ODMRP, a popular unreliable multicast routing protocol for wireless networks. We compare the performance of the four schemes using extensive simulations. Our results show that the use of pure FEC can offer significant improvements in terms of reliability, increasing PDR up to 100% in many cases, but it can be very inefficient regarding the number of redundant packets it transmits. Moreover, a carefully designed hybrid protocol, such as RMDP, can maintain the same high level of reliability while improving the efficiency by up to 38% compared to a pure FEC scheme.","PeriodicalId":405751,"journal":{"name":"37th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN'07)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Case for FEC-Based Reliable Multicast in Wireless Mesh Networks\",\"authors\":\"Dimitrios Koutsonikolas, Y. C. Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DSN.2007.92\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many important applications in wireless mesh networks require reliable multicast communication. Previously, forward error correction (FEC) techniques have been proved successful for providing reliability in the Internet, as they avoid the control packet implosion and scalability problems of ARQ-based protocols. In this paper, we examine if FEC can be equally efficient wireless mesh networks. We implement four reliable schemes initially proposed for wired networks on top of ODMRP, a popular unreliable multicast routing protocol for wireless networks. We compare the performance of the four schemes using extensive simulations. Our results show that the use of pure FEC can offer significant improvements in terms of reliability, increasing PDR up to 100% in many cases, but it can be very inefficient regarding the number of redundant packets it transmits. Moreover, a carefully designed hybrid protocol, such as RMDP, can maintain the same high level of reliability while improving the efficiency by up to 38% compared to a pure FEC scheme.\",\"PeriodicalId\":405751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"37th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN'07)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"37th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN'07)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DSN.2007.92\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"37th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN'07)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DSN.2007.92","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

无线网状网络中的许多重要应用都需要可靠的组播通信。以前,前向纠错(FEC)技术已经被证明能够成功地为Internet提供可靠性,因为它们避免了基于arq协议的控制数据包内爆和可伸缩性问题。在本文中,我们研究FEC是否可以是同样有效的无线网状网络。我们在ODMRP(一种流行的无线网络不可靠组播路由协议)的基础上实现了四种最初为有线网络提出的可靠方案。我们通过大量的仿真比较了四种方案的性能。我们的结果表明,使用纯FEC可以在可靠性方面提供显著的改进,在许多情况下将PDR提高到100%,但是在传输冗余数据包的数量方面,它可能非常低效。此外,一个精心设计的混合协议,如RMDP,可以保持同样高水平的可靠性,同时与纯FEC方案相比,效率提高了38%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Case for FEC-Based Reliable Multicast in Wireless Mesh Networks
Many important applications in wireless mesh networks require reliable multicast communication. Previously, forward error correction (FEC) techniques have been proved successful for providing reliability in the Internet, as they avoid the control packet implosion and scalability problems of ARQ-based protocols. In this paper, we examine if FEC can be equally efficient wireless mesh networks. We implement four reliable schemes initially proposed for wired networks on top of ODMRP, a popular unreliable multicast routing protocol for wireless networks. We compare the performance of the four schemes using extensive simulations. Our results show that the use of pure FEC can offer significant improvements in terms of reliability, increasing PDR up to 100% in many cases, but it can be very inefficient regarding the number of redundant packets it transmits. Moreover, a carefully designed hybrid protocol, such as RMDP, can maintain the same high level of reliability while improving the efficiency by up to 38% compared to a pure FEC scheme.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of Software Watchdog as a Dependability Software Service for Automotive Safety Relevant Systems Using Process-Level Redundancy to Exploit Multiple Cores for Transient Fault Tolerance DSN 2007 Tutorials Reliability Techniques for RFID-Based Object Tracking Applications Minimizing Response Time for Quorum-System Protocols over Wide-Area Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1