{"title":"中国的政策体制正在转变","authors":"Hao-yang Jia","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3845448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using an estimated DSGE model with monetary and fiscal policy interactions and allowing for equilibrium indeterminacy, I find that a passive monetary and passive fiscal policy regime fits Chinese economy best. However, if money is introduced in the economy, things would be different before and after 2012. Specifically, the active monetary and passive fiscal policy prevailed before 2012 and passive monetary and passive fiscal policy fitted after 2012 in China. Besides, government spending has different impact before and after 2012 according to the model.","PeriodicalId":130158,"journal":{"name":"DecisionSciRN: Econometric Decision Models (Topic)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Policy Regime Shifts In China\",\"authors\":\"Hao-yang Jia\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3845448\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using an estimated DSGE model with monetary and fiscal policy interactions and allowing for equilibrium indeterminacy, I find that a passive monetary and passive fiscal policy regime fits Chinese economy best. However, if money is introduced in the economy, things would be different before and after 2012. Specifically, the active monetary and passive fiscal policy prevailed before 2012 and passive monetary and passive fiscal policy fitted after 2012 in China. Besides, government spending has different impact before and after 2012 according to the model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":130158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DecisionSciRN: Econometric Decision Models (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DecisionSciRN: Econometric Decision Models (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3845448\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DecisionSciRN: Econometric Decision Models (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3845448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Using an estimated DSGE model with monetary and fiscal policy interactions and allowing for equilibrium indeterminacy, I find that a passive monetary and passive fiscal policy regime fits Chinese economy best. However, if money is introduced in the economy, things would be different before and after 2012. Specifically, the active monetary and passive fiscal policy prevailed before 2012 and passive monetary and passive fiscal policy fitted after 2012 in China. Besides, government spending has different impact before and after 2012 according to the model.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
