“永远挺直腰板”:现代管理的谬论及其替代方案

V. C. Petersen
{"title":"“永远挺直腰板”:现代管理的谬论及其替代方案","authors":"V. C. Petersen","doi":"10.1108/09544780710729953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The purpose of this article is to show that the tools of modern management which are supposed to promote effectiveness, efficiency and responsible behaviour, may in fact contribute to the opposite, and to present the outline of an alternative based upon new ideas of self‐organisation and value‐based leadership.Design/methodology/approach – Practical examples are used to discuss and demonstrate the problematic consequences of using management tools like detailed work descriptions, standards, comprehensive measurement schemes, and rule‐based specifications of responsibility. Constructed examples and emerging theoretical concepts are used to discuss and propose an alternative to the use of such tools.Findings – The discussion indicates that the use of detailed work descriptions, standards, comprehensive measurement schemes, and rule‐based specifications of responsibility will result in mind‐less and care‐less behaviour by employees, while an alternative relying on self‐organisation and value‐based ...","PeriodicalId":412605,"journal":{"name":"The Tqm Magazine","volume":"156 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Always work with a straight back”: the fallacies of modern management and the alternative\",\"authors\":\"V. C. Petersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/09544780710729953\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose – The purpose of this article is to show that the tools of modern management which are supposed to promote effectiveness, efficiency and responsible behaviour, may in fact contribute to the opposite, and to present the outline of an alternative based upon new ideas of self‐organisation and value‐based leadership.Design/methodology/approach – Practical examples are used to discuss and demonstrate the problematic consequences of using management tools like detailed work descriptions, standards, comprehensive measurement schemes, and rule‐based specifications of responsibility. Constructed examples and emerging theoretical concepts are used to discuss and propose an alternative to the use of such tools.Findings – The discussion indicates that the use of detailed work descriptions, standards, comprehensive measurement schemes, and rule‐based specifications of responsibility will result in mind‐less and care‐less behaviour by employees, while an alternative relying on self‐organisation and value‐based ...\",\"PeriodicalId\":412605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Tqm Magazine\",\"volume\":\"156 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Tqm Magazine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/09544780710729953\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Tqm Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/09544780710729953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的-这篇文章的目的是表明现代管理的工具,应该促进有效性,效率和负责任的行为,实际上可能有助于相反的,并提出了一个基于自我组织和基于价值的领导的新思想的替代方案的轮廓。设计/方法论/方法-使用实际示例来讨论和演示使用管理工具(如详细的工作描述,标准,综合测量方案和基于规则的责任规范)的问题后果。构建的例子和新兴的理论概念被用来讨论和提出替代使用这些工具。研究结果-讨论表明,使用详细的工作描述、标准、全面的测量方案和基于规则的责任规范会导致员工无意识和漫不经心的行为,而另一种依赖于自我组织和基于价值的…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Always work with a straight back”: the fallacies of modern management and the alternative
Purpose – The purpose of this article is to show that the tools of modern management which are supposed to promote effectiveness, efficiency and responsible behaviour, may in fact contribute to the opposite, and to present the outline of an alternative based upon new ideas of self‐organisation and value‐based leadership.Design/methodology/approach – Practical examples are used to discuss and demonstrate the problematic consequences of using management tools like detailed work descriptions, standards, comprehensive measurement schemes, and rule‐based specifications of responsibility. Constructed examples and emerging theoretical concepts are used to discuss and propose an alternative to the use of such tools.Findings – The discussion indicates that the use of detailed work descriptions, standards, comprehensive measurement schemes, and rule‐based specifications of responsibility will result in mind‐less and care‐less behaviour by employees, while an alternative relying on self‐organisation and value‐based ...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The International Handbook on Innovation A new framework for managing change The validity of quality practices on performance of outsourced professional housing services EFQM model self‐assessment using a questionnaire approach in university administrative services Lean Six Sigma Statistics: Calculating Process Efficiencies in Transactional Projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1