去同质化罗宾斯和米塞斯的方法论

G. Pickering
{"title":"去同质化罗宾斯和米塞斯的方法论","authors":"G. Pickering","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3677530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lionel Robbins’s 'An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science' is frequently cited as one of the most influential works on economic methodology of the twentieth century. Yet, paradoxically, Robbins’s Essay is also generally acknowledged to have been significantly influenced by the controversial and widely rejected methodological views of Ludwig von Mises. This article examines a number of subtle but significant areas in which Robbins’s Essay can be seen to diverge from Mises’s methodological writings, in order to not only clarify both men’s views, but also to gain some insight into the causes behind the widely divergent extent to which their works have been adopted into the canon of economic orthodoxy.","PeriodicalId":226815,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy & Methodology of Economics eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dehomogenizing Robbins and Mises on Methodology\",\"authors\":\"G. Pickering\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3677530\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Lionel Robbins’s 'An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science' is frequently cited as one of the most influential works on economic methodology of the twentieth century. Yet, paradoxically, Robbins’s Essay is also generally acknowledged to have been significantly influenced by the controversial and widely rejected methodological views of Ludwig von Mises. This article examines a number of subtle but significant areas in which Robbins’s Essay can be seen to diverge from Mises’s methodological writings, in order to not only clarify both men’s views, but also to gain some insight into the causes behind the widely divergent extent to which their works have been adopted into the canon of economic orthodoxy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":226815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophy & Methodology of Economics eJournal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophy & Methodology of Economics eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3677530\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy & Methodology of Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3677530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

莱昂内尔·罗宾斯(Lionel Robbins)的《论经济科学的性质和意义》(An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science)经常被引用为20世纪最具影响力的经济方法论著作之一。然而,矛盾的是,罗宾斯的论文也被普遍认为受到了路德维希·冯·米塞斯有争议且被广泛拒绝的方法论观点的重大影响。本文考察了一些微妙但重要的领域,在这些领域中,罗宾斯的论文可以被视为与米塞斯的方法论著作不同,这不仅是为了澄清两人的观点,也是为了深入了解他们的作品被采纳为经济学正统经典的广泛分歧程度背后的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dehomogenizing Robbins and Mises on Methodology
Lionel Robbins’s 'An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science' is frequently cited as one of the most influential works on economic methodology of the twentieth century. Yet, paradoxically, Robbins’s Essay is also generally acknowledged to have been significantly influenced by the controversial and widely rejected methodological views of Ludwig von Mises. This article examines a number of subtle but significant areas in which Robbins’s Essay can be seen to diverge from Mises’s methodological writings, in order to not only clarify both men’s views, but also to gain some insight into the causes behind the widely divergent extent to which their works have been adopted into the canon of economic orthodoxy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"The Eyes and Ears of the Agricultural Markets": A History of Information in Interwar Agricultural Economics Deepening and Widening Social Identity Analysis in Economics In Search of Santa Claus: Samuelson, Stigler, and Coase Theorem Worlds Reports from China: Joan Robinson as Observer and Travel Writer, 1953-78 Introduction to a Symposium on Carl Menger on the Centenary of his Death
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1