参与电子游戏:以活动为中心的玩家体验分析

Nicole McMahon, Peta Wyeth, Daniel M. Johnson
{"title":"参与电子游戏:以活动为中心的玩家体验分析","authors":"Nicole McMahon, Peta Wyeth, Daniel M. Johnson","doi":"10.1145/2838739.2838781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper focuses on examining play activities in people's favourite videogame experience. Through interviews with 30 videogame players we discovered which types of play activities are most appealing. Our research identifies the level of appeal of a wide range of game play activities. We have established that high levels of engagement for many participants is grounded in play as power and play as strategy, with play as fantasy adding to the experience. Through our study we established that conflict-based activities hold strong appeal. We subsequently investigated the context in which players talked about their experience of conflict within game. By using activities as a categorisation of gameplay we have been able to capture the play experience across a range of games and a range of gaming contexts. By examining players' individual experience we begin to understand why conflict in videogames appears to be a popular choice of activities.","PeriodicalId":364334,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engaging in Videogame Play: An Activity-Centric Analysis of the Player Experience\",\"authors\":\"Nicole McMahon, Peta Wyeth, Daniel M. Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2838739.2838781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper focuses on examining play activities in people's favourite videogame experience. Through interviews with 30 videogame players we discovered which types of play activities are most appealing. Our research identifies the level of appeal of a wide range of game play activities. We have established that high levels of engagement for many participants is grounded in play as power and play as strategy, with play as fantasy adding to the experience. Through our study we established that conflict-based activities hold strong appeal. We subsequently investigated the context in which players talked about their experience of conflict within game. By using activities as a categorisation of gameplay we have been able to capture the play experience across a range of games and a range of gaming contexts. By examining players' individual experience we begin to understand why conflict in videogames appears to be a popular choice of activities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":364334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2838739.2838781\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2838739.2838781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文主要研究人们最喜欢的电子游戏体验中的游戏活动。通过对30名电子游戏玩家的采访,我们发现了哪种类型的游戏活动最吸引人。我们的研究确定了各种游戏活动的吸引力水平。我们已经确定,许多参与者的高参与度是基于将游戏作为力量和策略,将游戏作为幻想来增加体验。通过我们的研究,我们确定基于冲突的活动具有很强的吸引力。我们随后调查了玩家谈论他们在游戏中的冲突体验的情境。通过使用活动作为游戏玩法的分类,我们能够在一系列游戏和游戏环境中捕捉到游戏体验。通过研究玩家的个人体验,我们开始理解为什么电子游戏中的冲突似乎是一种受欢迎的活动选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Engaging in Videogame Play: An Activity-Centric Analysis of the Player Experience
This paper focuses on examining play activities in people's favourite videogame experience. Through interviews with 30 videogame players we discovered which types of play activities are most appealing. Our research identifies the level of appeal of a wide range of game play activities. We have established that high levels of engagement for many participants is grounded in play as power and play as strategy, with play as fantasy adding to the experience. Through our study we established that conflict-based activities hold strong appeal. We subsequently investigated the context in which players talked about their experience of conflict within game. By using activities as a categorisation of gameplay we have been able to capture the play experience across a range of games and a range of gaming contexts. By examining players' individual experience we begin to understand why conflict in videogames appears to be a popular choice of activities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Three is a crowd? Our experience of testing large-scale social software in a usability lab Touchless Gestural Interaction with Wizard-of-Oz: Analysing User Behaviour Digitised Necrophilia: Technology and Psychosocial Orientations in the Age of ISIS and Drone Warfare Back to the Future: Identifying Interface Trends from the Past, Present and Future in Immersive Applications Evanescent Adaptation on Small Screens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1