移动平台上单元测试技术的比较评价

Selin Benli, A. Habash, A. Herrmann, Tyler Loftis, Devon M. Simmonds
{"title":"移动平台上单元测试技术的比较评价","authors":"Selin Benli, A. Habash, A. Herrmann, Tyler Loftis, Devon M. Simmonds","doi":"10.1109/ITNG.2012.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software testing is generally an expensive, ad hoc and unpredictable process. Therefore, a better understanding of and an improvement of unit testing methods may improve the overall software testing process leading to more efficient test method selection and increased fault detection accuracy. The aim of this study is evaluate Black Box and White Box unit testing methods for the Android operating system. While several investigations have looked at unit testing using Black Box and White Box techniques, our research focuses explicitly on unit testing for Android applications. Test cases were created using JUnit and the program under test was seeded with errors by an outside party. We evaluated the performance of these two test methods on the difficulty of developing test cases for each method and the effectiveness of finding software errors in a controlled environment. Our results showed benefits and challenges for both testing techniques. Inferences and implications are also presented.","PeriodicalId":117236,"journal":{"name":"2012 Ninth International Conference on Information Technology - New Generations","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Evaluation of Unit Testing Techniques on a Mobile Platform\",\"authors\":\"Selin Benli, A. Habash, A. Herrmann, Tyler Loftis, Devon M. Simmonds\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ITNG.2012.45\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Software testing is generally an expensive, ad hoc and unpredictable process. Therefore, a better understanding of and an improvement of unit testing methods may improve the overall software testing process leading to more efficient test method selection and increased fault detection accuracy. The aim of this study is evaluate Black Box and White Box unit testing methods for the Android operating system. While several investigations have looked at unit testing using Black Box and White Box techniques, our research focuses explicitly on unit testing for Android applications. Test cases were created using JUnit and the program under test was seeded with errors by an outside party. We evaluated the performance of these two test methods on the difficulty of developing test cases for each method and the effectiveness of finding software errors in a controlled environment. Our results showed benefits and challenges for both testing techniques. Inferences and implications are also presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 Ninth International Conference on Information Technology - New Generations\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 Ninth International Conference on Information Technology - New Generations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITNG.2012.45\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Ninth International Conference on Information Technology - New Generations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITNG.2012.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

软件测试通常是一个昂贵的、临时的和不可预测的过程。因此,更好地理解和改进单元测试方法可以改进整个软件测试过程,从而导致更有效的测试方法选择和提高故障检测的准确性。本研究的目的是评估黑盒和白盒单元测试方法的Android操作系统。虽然有一些调查研究使用黑盒和白盒技术进行单元测试,但我们的研究明确侧重于Android应用程序的单元测试。测试用例是使用JUnit创建的,并且被测试的程序是由外部方添加错误的。我们根据为每种方法开发测试用例的难度以及在受控环境中发现软件错误的有效性来评估这两种测试方法的性能。我们的结果显示了两种测试技术的优点和挑战。并提出了推论和启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparative Evaluation of Unit Testing Techniques on a Mobile Platform
Software testing is generally an expensive, ad hoc and unpredictable process. Therefore, a better understanding of and an improvement of unit testing methods may improve the overall software testing process leading to more efficient test method selection and increased fault detection accuracy. The aim of this study is evaluate Black Box and White Box unit testing methods for the Android operating system. While several investigations have looked at unit testing using Black Box and White Box techniques, our research focuses explicitly on unit testing for Android applications. Test cases were created using JUnit and the program under test was seeded with errors by an outside party. We evaluated the performance of these two test methods on the difficulty of developing test cases for each method and the effectiveness of finding software errors in a controlled environment. Our results showed benefits and challenges for both testing techniques. Inferences and implications are also presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Brain Imaging for Diagnosis of Schizophrenia: Challenges, Successes and a Research Road Map User-centric Trust-based Recommendation Do Videowikis on the Web Support Better (Constructivist) Learning in the Basics of Information Systems Science? An MDA-Based Approach for WS Composition Using UML Scenarios A Mobile Data Analysis Framework for Environmental Health Decision Support
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1