{"title":"以义肢为伙伴:语用学与人机界面","authors":"R. Janney","doi":"10.1109/CT.1997.617684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The computer can be regarded as a type of prosthesis: a device that extends the range of action of the human mind or can partly replace certain functions of an impaired human nervous system. Like other prostheses, however, computers are never fully equivalent replacements for human functions. It is argued that present computers extend our cognitive 'reach', at the cost of partly paralyzing our emotional 'grasp' of things. They promote contact without a sense of touch. The problem suggested, lies at the human computer interface: in the user's need to communicate with the computer in order to use it, and in certain pragmatic deficits of computers that make natural communication with them impossible. As a partner, the computer tends to resemble a schizophrenic suffering from severe 'intrapsychic ataxia'-the psychiatric term for a radical separation of cognition from emotion. Its flame of reference, like that of the schizophrenic, is detached, rigid, and self reflexive. Interacting in accordance with the requirements of its programs, the computer, like the schizophrenic, forces us to empathize one sidedly with it and communicate with it on its own terms. And the suspicion arises that the better we can do this, the more like it we become.","PeriodicalId":212776,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Second International Conference on Cognitive Technology Humanizing the Information Age","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The prosthesis as partner: pragmatics and the human-computer interface\",\"authors\":\"R. Janney\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CT.1997.617684\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The computer can be regarded as a type of prosthesis: a device that extends the range of action of the human mind or can partly replace certain functions of an impaired human nervous system. Like other prostheses, however, computers are never fully equivalent replacements for human functions. It is argued that present computers extend our cognitive 'reach', at the cost of partly paralyzing our emotional 'grasp' of things. They promote contact without a sense of touch. The problem suggested, lies at the human computer interface: in the user's need to communicate with the computer in order to use it, and in certain pragmatic deficits of computers that make natural communication with them impossible. As a partner, the computer tends to resemble a schizophrenic suffering from severe 'intrapsychic ataxia'-the psychiatric term for a radical separation of cognition from emotion. Its flame of reference, like that of the schizophrenic, is detached, rigid, and self reflexive. Interacting in accordance with the requirements of its programs, the computer, like the schizophrenic, forces us to empathize one sidedly with it and communicate with it on its own terms. And the suspicion arises that the better we can do this, the more like it we become.\",\"PeriodicalId\":212776,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings Second International Conference on Cognitive Technology Humanizing the Information Age\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings Second International Conference on Cognitive Technology Humanizing the Information Age\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CT.1997.617684\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Second International Conference on Cognitive Technology Humanizing the Information Age","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CT.1997.617684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

计算机可以被看作是一种假肢:一种扩展人类思维活动范围的装置,或者可以部分取代受损的人类神经系统的某些功能。然而,像其他假肢一样,计算机永远不能完全取代人类的功能。有人认为,现在的计算机扩展了我们的认知“范围”,代价是部分地麻痹了我们对事物的情感“把握”。它们在没有触觉的情况下促进接触。问题在于人机界面:用户需要与计算机进行交流才能使用它,以及计算机的某些实用缺陷,这些缺陷使与计算机的自然交流成为不可能。作为伴侣,电脑往往像患有严重“心理内共济失调”的精神分裂症患者——精神病学术语,指认知与情感的彻底分离。它的参照之火,就像精神分裂症患者的参照之火一样,是超然的、僵化的、自我反思的。电脑按照程序的要求进行互动,就像精神分裂症患者一样,迫使我们片面地与它产生共鸣,并按照它自己的方式与它交流。于是怀疑就产生了,我们在这方面做得越好,我们就会变得越像它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The prosthesis as partner: pragmatics and the human-computer interface
The computer can be regarded as a type of prosthesis: a device that extends the range of action of the human mind or can partly replace certain functions of an impaired human nervous system. Like other prostheses, however, computers are never fully equivalent replacements for human functions. It is argued that present computers extend our cognitive 'reach', at the cost of partly paralyzing our emotional 'grasp' of things. They promote contact without a sense of touch. The problem suggested, lies at the human computer interface: in the user's need to communicate with the computer in order to use it, and in certain pragmatic deficits of computers that make natural communication with them impossible. As a partner, the computer tends to resemble a schizophrenic suffering from severe 'intrapsychic ataxia'-the psychiatric term for a radical separation of cognition from emotion. Its flame of reference, like that of the schizophrenic, is detached, rigid, and self reflexive. Interacting in accordance with the requirements of its programs, the computer, like the schizophrenic, forces us to empathize one sidedly with it and communicate with it on its own terms. And the suspicion arises that the better we can do this, the more like it we become.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cooperative learning in a virtual university Technology and tertiary education On why the blind leading the blind is a good idea The role of interactive conceptions of intelligence and life in cognitive technology Natural language and artificial technology-it ain't necessarily so
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1