比特币作为财产:欢迎澄清?

K. F. Low
{"title":"比特币作为财产:欢迎澄清?","authors":"K. F. Low","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3538956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In AA v Persons Unknown & Ors, Re Bitcoin [2019] EWHC 3556 (Comm), Bryan J offered the first reasoned judgment for deciding that bitcoins were property under English law for the purposes of an interim proprietary injunction, following similar, less fully reasoned, decisions in Vorotyntseva v Money-4 Ltd, t/a Nebeus.com [2018] EWHC 2598 (Ch) by Birss J and Liam David Robertson v Persons Unknown (unreported 15 July 2019) by Moulder J, and also relying upon the controversial decision of the Singapore International Commercial Court in B2C2 Ltd v Quoine Pte Ltd [2019] SGHC(I) 3; [2019] 4 SLR 17. This paper critiques the court's conclusion that bitcoins are an intangible property but not a chose in action.","PeriodicalId":128369,"journal":{"name":"CompSciRN: Other Cybersecurity","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bitcoins as Property: Welcome Clarity?\",\"authors\":\"K. F. Low\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3538956\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In AA v Persons Unknown & Ors, Re Bitcoin [2019] EWHC 3556 (Comm), Bryan J offered the first reasoned judgment for deciding that bitcoins were property under English law for the purposes of an interim proprietary injunction, following similar, less fully reasoned, decisions in Vorotyntseva v Money-4 Ltd, t/a Nebeus.com [2018] EWHC 2598 (Ch) by Birss J and Liam David Robertson v Persons Unknown (unreported 15 July 2019) by Moulder J, and also relying upon the controversial decision of the Singapore International Commercial Court in B2C2 Ltd v Quoine Pte Ltd [2019] SGHC(I) 3; [2019] 4 SLR 17. This paper critiques the court's conclusion that bitcoins are an intangible property but not a chose in action.\",\"PeriodicalId\":128369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CompSciRN: Other Cybersecurity\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CompSciRN: Other Cybersecurity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3538956\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CompSciRN: Other Cybersecurity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3538956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在AA诉身份不明人士案中在Vorotyntseva v Money-4 Ltd, t/a Nebeus.com [2018] EWHC 2598 (Ch) by Birss J和Liam David Robertson v Persons Unknown(2019年7月15日未报告)by Moulder J做出类似但不太充分的判决后,rebitcoin [2019] EWHC 3556 (Comm), Bryan J提出了第一个合理的判决,决定比特币是英国法律下的财产,用于临时所有权禁令。并依据新加坡国际商事法庭在B2C2 Ltd诉Quoine Pte Ltd [2019] SGHC(I) 3案中有争议的判决;[2019] 4 SLR 17。本文对法院关于比特币是一种无形财产而不是行动选择的结论提出了批评。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bitcoins as Property: Welcome Clarity?
In AA v Persons Unknown & Ors, Re Bitcoin [2019] EWHC 3556 (Comm), Bryan J offered the first reasoned judgment for deciding that bitcoins were property under English law for the purposes of an interim proprietary injunction, following similar, less fully reasoned, decisions in Vorotyntseva v Money-4 Ltd, t/a Nebeus.com [2018] EWHC 2598 (Ch) by Birss J and Liam David Robertson v Persons Unknown (unreported 15 July 2019) by Moulder J, and also relying upon the controversial decision of the Singapore International Commercial Court in B2C2 Ltd v Quoine Pte Ltd [2019] SGHC(I) 3; [2019] 4 SLR 17. This paper critiques the court's conclusion that bitcoins are an intangible property but not a chose in action.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Blockchain Technology and Intellectual Property – A Basic Introduction Endogenous Data Collection in Platform Markets: Privacy and Welfare Beyond Bitcoin: The Economics of Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain Technologies (Chapter 6: Smart Contracts and Blockchain) Privacy by Default, Abuse by Design: EU Competition Concerns About Apple's New App Tracking Policy Cryptocurrency & Its Impact on Environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1