用ITEMAN 4.3程序探究英语教师初中期末考试质量

Mercy Aprilia Dyah Arini -, Dzulfikri
{"title":"用ITEMAN 4.3程序探究英语教师初中期末考试质量","authors":"Mercy Aprilia Dyah Arini -, Dzulfikri","doi":"10.29062/edu.v6i2.425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ministry of Education Department, since the removal of USBN, mandates every school to conduct a school final exam that should made by the teachers. In this study, the writer focuses on the English Junior High School Final Exam made by EFL teacher distributed in Mojokerto academic year 2021/2022. In order to know the quality of the item test, the analysis can be done by investigating the validity, reliability, item difficulty, item discrimination, and item distractors. This study used descriptive quantitative. The respondents of this study were taken from English school final exam of 9th-grade students in MTS Bahrul Ulum which consists of 50 multiple choice items from 31 students. The instrument are the test question, the students’ answer sheet, and the answer key. It will be analyzed by using ITEMAN 4.3 program as an effective solution for item test analysis. The result indicates that the content validity still do not cover the whole material in the syllabus. The reliability of the test is 0.91 which is categorized as reliable. The difficulty level of the item test is 0.60 or 60% which is considered good. The item discrimination is 0.38 considered as satisfactory. The effective item distractors is 48%, smaller than the percentage of ineffective items. In conclusion, the quality of English Junior High School Final Exam made by EFL teacher distributed in Mojokerto academic year 2021/2022 in terms of validity, reliability, item difficulty, item discrimination, and item distractors absolutely needs improving. \nKeywords: item analysis, validity, reliability, item distractor, item discrimination, item difficulty, descriptive quantitative","PeriodicalId":120978,"journal":{"name":"EDUTEC : Journal of Education And Technology","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interrogating the Quality of Junior High School Final Exam Made by EFL Teacher Using ITEMAN 4.3 Program\",\"authors\":\"Mercy Aprilia Dyah Arini -, Dzulfikri\",\"doi\":\"10.29062/edu.v6i2.425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The ministry of Education Department, since the removal of USBN, mandates every school to conduct a school final exam that should made by the teachers. In this study, the writer focuses on the English Junior High School Final Exam made by EFL teacher distributed in Mojokerto academic year 2021/2022. In order to know the quality of the item test, the analysis can be done by investigating the validity, reliability, item difficulty, item discrimination, and item distractors. This study used descriptive quantitative. The respondents of this study were taken from English school final exam of 9th-grade students in MTS Bahrul Ulum which consists of 50 multiple choice items from 31 students. The instrument are the test question, the students’ answer sheet, and the answer key. It will be analyzed by using ITEMAN 4.3 program as an effective solution for item test analysis. The result indicates that the content validity still do not cover the whole material in the syllabus. The reliability of the test is 0.91 which is categorized as reliable. The difficulty level of the item test is 0.60 or 60% which is considered good. The item discrimination is 0.38 considered as satisfactory. The effective item distractors is 48%, smaller than the percentage of ineffective items. In conclusion, the quality of English Junior High School Final Exam made by EFL teacher distributed in Mojokerto academic year 2021/2022 in terms of validity, reliability, item difficulty, item discrimination, and item distractors absolutely needs improving. \\nKeywords: item analysis, validity, reliability, item distractor, item discrimination, item difficulty, descriptive quantitative\",\"PeriodicalId\":120978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EDUTEC : Journal of Education And Technology\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EDUTEC : Journal of Education And Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29062/edu.v6i2.425\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDUTEC : Journal of Education And Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29062/edu.v6i2.425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教育部在取消USBN后,要求每所学校进行由教师参加的期末考试。本研究以Mojokerto 2021/2022学年英语教师制作的初中英语期末考试为研究对象。为了了解项目测试的质量,可以通过调查效度、信度、项目难度、项目辨别力和项目干扰因素来进行分析。本研究采用描述性定量方法。本研究的调查对象为MTS巴鲁鲁校区九年级英语学校期末考试的31名学生,共50个选择题。工具是试题、学生答题卡和答题卡。将ITEMAN 4.3程序作为项目测试分析的有效解决方案进行分析。结果表明,内容效度仍不能覆盖教学大纲中的全部内容。测试的信度为0.91,属于可靠。项目测试的难度水平为0.60或60%,被认为是好的。项目判别为0.38被认为是满意的。有效项目干扰物的比例为48%,小于无效项目的比例。综上所述,Mojokerto 2021/2022学年英语教师制作的初中英语期末考试在效度、信度、试题难度、试题辨析、试题干扰因素等方面的质量都有待提高。关键词:项目分析,效度,信度,项目干扰,项目辨别,项目难度,描述性定量
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interrogating the Quality of Junior High School Final Exam Made by EFL Teacher Using ITEMAN 4.3 Program
The ministry of Education Department, since the removal of USBN, mandates every school to conduct a school final exam that should made by the teachers. In this study, the writer focuses on the English Junior High School Final Exam made by EFL teacher distributed in Mojokerto academic year 2021/2022. In order to know the quality of the item test, the analysis can be done by investigating the validity, reliability, item difficulty, item discrimination, and item distractors. This study used descriptive quantitative. The respondents of this study were taken from English school final exam of 9th-grade students in MTS Bahrul Ulum which consists of 50 multiple choice items from 31 students. The instrument are the test question, the students’ answer sheet, and the answer key. It will be analyzed by using ITEMAN 4.3 program as an effective solution for item test analysis. The result indicates that the content validity still do not cover the whole material in the syllabus. The reliability of the test is 0.91 which is categorized as reliable. The difficulty level of the item test is 0.60 or 60% which is considered good. The item discrimination is 0.38 considered as satisfactory. The effective item distractors is 48%, smaller than the percentage of ineffective items. In conclusion, the quality of English Junior High School Final Exam made by EFL teacher distributed in Mojokerto academic year 2021/2022 in terms of validity, reliability, item difficulty, item discrimination, and item distractors absolutely needs improving. Keywords: item analysis, validity, reliability, item distractor, item discrimination, item difficulty, descriptive quantitative
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evolution of Digital Education to Online Education in West Bengal & Its Impact The Actualization of the Value of Religious Moderation Islamic Perspective of Wasatiyah in the Subject of Akidah Aqhlak in MA Al Musdariyah, Cimahi City, West Java Analysis of Gender, Self-Concept and Self-Confidence of Students in Learning Religious Education and Ethics at Istiqamah Bandung High School Development of Islamic Religious Education (PAI) Learning Media Based on TikTok to Improve Students' Critical Thinking Skills Development Of Character Education Management Model At SDIT Al-Hikam Purwakarta
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1