在2008年俄格冲突的背景下,格鲁吉亚赢得了对俄罗斯的信息战吗?

Khatuna Chapichadze
{"title":"在2008年俄格冲突的背景下,格鲁吉亚赢得了对俄罗斯的信息战吗?","authors":"Khatuna Chapichadze","doi":"10.33674/2201818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has been established and promoted the strong belief in the Georgian public, however also in the international community, that despite significant human, territorial and state loss, as well as psychological damage and failure Georgia experienced as a consequence of the 2008 conflict with Russia, the smaller country gained victory over the bigger one in terms of the information war. There is attempt in the paper to find out if the above-mentioned view has been argumented sufficiently, taking into consideration two major factors: 1. The EU-backed “Report of the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on the Conflict in Georgia,” known informally as the “Tagliavini Report”, blaming Georgian former government of Mikheil Saakashvili „to fire the first shot” in the subsequent confrontation; 2. The smaller nation-state syndrome as of the victim in the conflictual interaction with the bigger one, playing important role not only in the Russian-Georgian, but also Georgian-Abkhazian and Georgian-Ossetian relations.","PeriodicalId":256788,"journal":{"name":"Ante Portas - Studia nad bezpieczeństwem","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HAS GEORGIA WON THE INFORMATION WAR AGAINST RUSSIA IN THE CONTEXT OF THE RUSSIAN-GEORGIAN CONFLICT OF 2008?\",\"authors\":\"Khatuna Chapichadze\",\"doi\":\"10.33674/2201818\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There has been established and promoted the strong belief in the Georgian public, however also in the international community, that despite significant human, territorial and state loss, as well as psychological damage and failure Georgia experienced as a consequence of the 2008 conflict with Russia, the smaller country gained victory over the bigger one in terms of the information war. There is attempt in the paper to find out if the above-mentioned view has been argumented sufficiently, taking into consideration two major factors: 1. The EU-backed “Report of the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on the Conflict in Georgia,” known informally as the “Tagliavini Report”, blaming Georgian former government of Mikheil Saakashvili „to fire the first shot” in the subsequent confrontation; 2. The smaller nation-state syndrome as of the victim in the conflictual interaction with the bigger one, playing important role not only in the Russian-Georgian, but also Georgian-Abkhazian and Georgian-Ossetian relations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ante Portas - Studia nad bezpieczeństwem\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ante Portas - Studia nad bezpieczeństwem\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33674/2201818\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ante Portas - Studia nad bezpieczeństwem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33674/2201818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

格鲁吉亚公众以及国际社会已经建立并促进了一种强烈的信念,即尽管格鲁吉亚在2008年与俄罗斯的冲突中遭受了重大的人员、领土和国家损失,以及心理上的伤害和失败,但在信息战中,小国战胜了大国。本文试图找出上述观点是否得到了充分的论证,主要考虑两个因素:1。欧盟支持的“格鲁吉亚冲突独立国际实况调查团报告”,非正式地称为“塔利亚维尼报告”,指责格鲁吉亚前政府米哈伊尔·萨卡什维利在随后的对抗中“开了第一枪”;2. 在与大民族国家的冲突互动中,小民族国家综合症作为受害者,不仅在俄罗斯-格鲁吉亚,而且在格鲁吉亚-阿布哈兹和格鲁吉亚-奥塞梯关系中发挥着重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
HAS GEORGIA WON THE INFORMATION WAR AGAINST RUSSIA IN THE CONTEXT OF THE RUSSIAN-GEORGIAN CONFLICT OF 2008?
There has been established and promoted the strong belief in the Georgian public, however also in the international community, that despite significant human, territorial and state loss, as well as psychological damage and failure Georgia experienced as a consequence of the 2008 conflict with Russia, the smaller country gained victory over the bigger one in terms of the information war. There is attempt in the paper to find out if the above-mentioned view has been argumented sufficiently, taking into consideration two major factors: 1. The EU-backed “Report of the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on the Conflict in Georgia,” known informally as the “Tagliavini Report”, blaming Georgian former government of Mikheil Saakashvili „to fire the first shot” in the subsequent confrontation; 2. The smaller nation-state syndrome as of the victim in the conflictual interaction with the bigger one, playing important role not only in the Russian-Georgian, but also Georgian-Abkhazian and Georgian-Ossetian relations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
NATO Regional Approaches to Missile Defense – in the Context of Black Sea Security Russia’s Weapon of Words in Numbers. Evolution of Russian Assertive (Dis)Information Actions: Comparative Analysis of the Cases of RussoGeorgian War 2008 & Annexation of Crimea 2014 . An Assessment of Special Military Operations in Internal Security Management in Nigeria (1966-2019) Influence of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty Termination on the Regional Security of Central Asia Bezpieczeństwo ekonomiczne, zmiany klimatyczne, wyzwania
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1