灾害情景下不同机动模式的仿真与评估

G. Walunjkar, A. Koteswara Rao
{"title":"灾害情景下不同机动模式的仿真与评估","authors":"G. Walunjkar, A. Koteswara Rao","doi":"10.1109/RTEICT46194.2019.9016893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peoples trapped in the disastrous areas may have chances to survive if they are rescued in seventy two hours. Ad hoc networks are considered more suitable for such scenarios due to infrastructure-less feature. Two different mobility models - Reference group Mobility Model and Disaster Area Model are generally used in such scenario. In this paper, various ad hoc routing protocols such as destination distance vector routing protocol, dynamic source routing protocol, ad hoc on demand routing protocol and ad hoc on demand multipath routing protocol are discussed and analyzed using reference group mobility models and disaster area model. Also these protocols are compared using various performance metrics such as packet delivery ratio, delay, throughput, control overhead, average energy consumed etc.","PeriodicalId":269385,"journal":{"name":"2019 4th International Conference on Recent Trends on Electronics, Information, Communication & Technology (RTEICT)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulation and Evaluation of Different Mobility Models in Disaster Scenarios\",\"authors\":\"G. Walunjkar, A. Koteswara Rao\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RTEICT46194.2019.9016893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Peoples trapped in the disastrous areas may have chances to survive if they are rescued in seventy two hours. Ad hoc networks are considered more suitable for such scenarios due to infrastructure-less feature. Two different mobility models - Reference group Mobility Model and Disaster Area Model are generally used in such scenario. In this paper, various ad hoc routing protocols such as destination distance vector routing protocol, dynamic source routing protocol, ad hoc on demand routing protocol and ad hoc on demand multipath routing protocol are discussed and analyzed using reference group mobility models and disaster area model. Also these protocols are compared using various performance metrics such as packet delivery ratio, delay, throughput, control overhead, average energy consumed etc.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 4th International Conference on Recent Trends on Electronics, Information, Communication & Technology (RTEICT)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 4th International Conference on Recent Trends on Electronics, Information, Communication & Technology (RTEICT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RTEICT46194.2019.9016893\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 4th International Conference on Recent Trends on Electronics, Information, Communication & Technology (RTEICT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RTEICT46194.2019.9016893","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

被困在灾区的人们如果能在72小时内被救出,或许还有一线生机。由于无基础设施的特性,Ad hoc网络被认为更适合此类场景。在这种情况下,通常使用两种不同的移动模型——参考群体移动模型和灾区移动模型。本文利用参考群移动模型和灾区模型,对目的距离矢量路由协议、动态源路由协议、自组织随需路由协议和自组织随需多路径路由协议等各种自组织路由协议进行了讨论和分析。此外,这些协议还使用各种性能指标进行比较,如数据包传输率、延迟、吞吐量、控制开销、平均能耗等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Simulation and Evaluation of Different Mobility Models in Disaster Scenarios
Peoples trapped in the disastrous areas may have chances to survive if they are rescued in seventy two hours. Ad hoc networks are considered more suitable for such scenarios due to infrastructure-less feature. Two different mobility models - Reference group Mobility Model and Disaster Area Model are generally used in such scenario. In this paper, various ad hoc routing protocols such as destination distance vector routing protocol, dynamic source routing protocol, ad hoc on demand routing protocol and ad hoc on demand multipath routing protocol are discussed and analyzed using reference group mobility models and disaster area model. Also these protocols are compared using various performance metrics such as packet delivery ratio, delay, throughput, control overhead, average energy consumed etc.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Design and analysis of an optical transit network IoT Based Automatic Billing System Using Barcode Scanner by Android Device and Monitoring Unregistered Barcode by RFID Feature Extraction of Intra-Pulse Modulated LPI Waveforms Using STFT Implementation of Smart Movable Road Divider and Ambulance Clearance using IoT Energy Reserve Management in Automobile Airbag Control Unit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1