从规范结婚仪式到承认结婚仪式

R. Parveen
{"title":"从规范结婚仪式到承认结婚仪式","authors":"R. Parveen","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv13qfvmm.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter argues for a post-ceremony registration system for weddings, similar to the registration of births and deaths, which would enable varied forms of marriage ceremony to be legally recognised. It contextualises ‘the Muslim problem’ and examines Muslim attitudes towards the nikah ceremony. It argues that individuals should be able to determine for themselves when and how they marry and that the state’s interests can be protected by such a post-ceremony registration system.","PeriodicalId":279989,"journal":{"name":"Cohabitation and Religious Marriage","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Regulating Marriage Ceremonies to Recognizing Marriage Ceremonies\",\"authors\":\"R. Parveen\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctv13qfvmm.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter argues for a post-ceremony registration system for weddings, similar to the registration of births and deaths, which would enable varied forms of marriage ceremony to be legally recognised. It contextualises ‘the Muslim problem’ and examines Muslim attitudes towards the nikah ceremony. It argues that individuals should be able to determine for themselves when and how they marry and that the state’s interests can be protected by such a post-ceremony registration system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":279989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cohabitation and Religious Marriage\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cohabitation and Religious Marriage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv13qfvmm.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cohabitation and Religious Marriage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv13qfvmm.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章主张建立类似于出生和死亡登记的婚礼仪式后登记制度,使各种形式的婚礼仪式得到法律承认。它将“穆斯林问题”置于语境中,并审视了穆斯林对尼卡仪式的态度。它认为,个人应该能够自己决定结婚的时间和方式,国家的利益可以通过这种仪式后登记制度得到保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From Regulating Marriage Ceremonies to Recognizing Marriage Ceremonies
This chapter argues for a post-ceremony registration system for weddings, similar to the registration of births and deaths, which would enable varied forms of marriage ceremony to be legally recognised. It contextualises ‘the Muslim problem’ and examines Muslim attitudes towards the nikah ceremony. It argues that individuals should be able to determine for themselves when and how they marry and that the state’s interests can be protected by such a post-ceremony registration system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conclusion Modern Marriage Myths: the Dichotomy Between Expectations of Legal Rationality and Lived Law Index ‘Regrettably it is not that Simple’: Religious-Only Marriages and Cohabitation:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1