贝伐单抗与玫瑰光动力治疗角膜新生血管的疗效比较研究

Aziza Ahmed, S. Abdelkawi, M. Elgohary, Ayman Elshinawy, D. Fouad
{"title":"贝伐单抗与玫瑰光动力治疗角膜新生血管的疗效比较研究","authors":"Aziza Ahmed, S. Abdelkawi, M. Elgohary, Ayman Elshinawy, D. Fouad","doi":"10.5114/AMSCD.2021.105408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: To compare the efficacy of bevacizumab and rose bengal photodynamic therapy (RB-PDT) in the treatment of corneal neovascularization (CNV). Material and methods: The study design included the induction of CNV by suture placement in three groups of New Zealand rabbits: (1) a group with CNV without any treatment; (2) a group treated with subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab (25 mg/eye); (3) a group treated with intravenous injection of rose bengal and exposed to 532 nm photodynamic therapy. For 4 weeks, the animals were followed up by slit-lamp to analyze the extent of CNV, evaluate the corneal protein secondary structure, and determine the oxidative stress index (OSI). Results: After 4 weeks, traces of neovascularization were observed only in the bevacizumab treated group with grade 0.5. The contents of α -helix and β -sheet were 17% and 61% in CNV, 32%, and 46% in bevacizumab and 40% and 36% in RB-PDT groups vs. 43% and 35% for the control group. Moreover, the percentage changes in the total oxidative status (TOS) for CNV, bevacizumab and RB-PDT groups were 97.1%, 14.6%, and 1.0%, respectively, with respect to the control. The total antioxidant status (TAC) showed no significant changes ( p > 0.05) for both treated groups. The percentage of changes in OSI was 15.9% and 1.3% in bevacizumab, and RB-PDT treated groups compared with the control group. Conclusions: Both modes of treatment were effective in the regression of CNV, but RB-PDT was more efficient than bevacizumab by improving the corneal protein secondary structure and the oxidative stress.","PeriodicalId":169652,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Medical Science - Civilization Diseases","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of the efficacy of bevacizumab \\nand rose bengal photodynamic therapy for treatment of corneal neovascularization\",\"authors\":\"Aziza Ahmed, S. Abdelkawi, M. Elgohary, Ayman Elshinawy, D. Fouad\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/AMSCD.2021.105408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: To compare the efficacy of bevacizumab and rose bengal photodynamic therapy (RB-PDT) in the treatment of corneal neovascularization (CNV). Material and methods: The study design included the induction of CNV by suture placement in three groups of New Zealand rabbits: (1) a group with CNV without any treatment; (2) a group treated with subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab (25 mg/eye); (3) a group treated with intravenous injection of rose bengal and exposed to 532 nm photodynamic therapy. For 4 weeks, the animals were followed up by slit-lamp to analyze the extent of CNV, evaluate the corneal protein secondary structure, and determine the oxidative stress index (OSI). Results: After 4 weeks, traces of neovascularization were observed only in the bevacizumab treated group with grade 0.5. The contents of α -helix and β -sheet were 17% and 61% in CNV, 32%, and 46% in bevacizumab and 40% and 36% in RB-PDT groups vs. 43% and 35% for the control group. Moreover, the percentage changes in the total oxidative status (TOS) for CNV, bevacizumab and RB-PDT groups were 97.1%, 14.6%, and 1.0%, respectively, with respect to the control. The total antioxidant status (TAC) showed no significant changes ( p > 0.05) for both treated groups. The percentage of changes in OSI was 15.9% and 1.3% in bevacizumab, and RB-PDT treated groups compared with the control group. Conclusions: Both modes of treatment were effective in the regression of CNV, but RB-PDT was more efficient than bevacizumab by improving the corneal protein secondary structure and the oxidative stress.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Medical Science - Civilization Diseases\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Medical Science - Civilization Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/AMSCD.2021.105408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Medical Science - Civilization Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/AMSCD.2021.105408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较贝伐单抗与玫瑰花光动力治疗(RB-PDT)治疗角膜新生血管(CNV)的疗效。材料和方法:研究设计包括三组新西兰兔的CNV诱导:(1)未经任何处理的CNV组;(2)结膜下注射贝伐单抗组(25 mg/眼);(3)静脉注射孟加拉玫瑰注射液,532 nm光动力照射组。采用裂隙灯随访4周,分析角膜CNV程度,评价角膜蛋白二级结构,测定氧化应激指数(OSI)。结果:4周后,仅在贝伐单抗0.5级治疗组观察到新生血管的痕迹。α -螺旋和β -薄片的含量在CNV组分别为17%和61%,贝伐单抗组为32%和46%,RB-PDT组为40%和36%,对照组为43%和35%。此外,与对照组相比,CNV组、贝伐单抗组和RB-PDT组的总氧化状态(TOS)变化百分比分别为97.1%、14.6%和1.0%。两组总抗氧化状态(TAC)均无显著变化(p > 0.05)。与对照组相比,贝伐单抗和RB-PDT治疗组的OSI变化百分比分别为15.9%和1.3%。结论:两种治疗方式均可有效逆转CNV,但RB-PDT通过改善角膜蛋白二级结构和氧化应激比贝伐单抗更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative study of the efficacy of bevacizumab and rose bengal photodynamic therapy for treatment of corneal neovascularization
Introduction: To compare the efficacy of bevacizumab and rose bengal photodynamic therapy (RB-PDT) in the treatment of corneal neovascularization (CNV). Material and methods: The study design included the induction of CNV by suture placement in three groups of New Zealand rabbits: (1) a group with CNV without any treatment; (2) a group treated with subconjunctival injection of bevacizumab (25 mg/eye); (3) a group treated with intravenous injection of rose bengal and exposed to 532 nm photodynamic therapy. For 4 weeks, the animals were followed up by slit-lamp to analyze the extent of CNV, evaluate the corneal protein secondary structure, and determine the oxidative stress index (OSI). Results: After 4 weeks, traces of neovascularization were observed only in the bevacizumab treated group with grade 0.5. The contents of α -helix and β -sheet were 17% and 61% in CNV, 32%, and 46% in bevacizumab and 40% and 36% in RB-PDT groups vs. 43% and 35% for the control group. Moreover, the percentage changes in the total oxidative status (TOS) for CNV, bevacizumab and RB-PDT groups were 97.1%, 14.6%, and 1.0%, respectively, with respect to the control. The total antioxidant status (TAC) showed no significant changes ( p > 0.05) for both treated groups. The percentage of changes in OSI was 15.9% and 1.3% in bevacizumab, and RB-PDT treated groups compared with the control group. Conclusions: Both modes of treatment were effective in the regression of CNV, but RB-PDT was more efficient than bevacizumab by improving the corneal protein secondary structure and the oxidative stress.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Between fire and flood. Drug-induced QT prolongation causes torsades de pointes and electrical storm Association of causes of type 2 diabetes mellitus and gestational diabetes with the clinical profile in the population of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan A comparison of partial repair with arthroscopic margin convergence suture and open superior capsular reconstruction in patients with massive rotator cuff tear Comparison of cotton swab to Whatman cellulose paper as media for examination of biomarkers from diabetic ulcers Hematoporphyrin binding sites on human serum albumin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1