我们是如何来到这里的

Jon S. Bailey, M. Burch
{"title":"我们是如何来到这里的","authors":"Jon S. Bailey, M. Burch","doi":"10.2307/j.ctt6wpj47.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"MAINSTREAM macroeconomics has a pretty poor reputation these days, both among the public at large and among economists in other fields. This is hardly surprising. There is little consensus on even the most basic questions in macro. Ask top academics (http://www.economist.com/node/21564175) why America’s post-crisis recovery has been so slow (http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2012/10/polling-experts) and you will get many different conflicting answers (http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2012/10/polling-experts-0) . But the most obvious reason for the widespread disdain is that the profession failed to predict that the biggest and most painful downturn since the Great Depression was even possible.","PeriodicalId":350760,"journal":{"name":"The RBT® Ethics Code","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How We Got Here\",\"authors\":\"Jon S. Bailey, M. Burch\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctt6wpj47.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"MAINSTREAM macroeconomics has a pretty poor reputation these days, both among the public at large and among economists in other fields. This is hardly surprising. There is little consensus on even the most basic questions in macro. Ask top academics (http://www.economist.com/node/21564175) why America’s post-crisis recovery has been so slow (http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2012/10/polling-experts) and you will get many different conflicting answers (http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2012/10/polling-experts-0) . But the most obvious reason for the widespread disdain is that the profession failed to predict that the biggest and most painful downturn since the Great Depression was even possible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":350760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The RBT® Ethics Code\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The RBT® Ethics Code\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6wpj47.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The RBT® Ethics Code","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6wpj47.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

如今,主流宏观经济学在公众和其他领域的经济学家中都名声不佳。这不足为奇。即使在最基本的宏观问题上,也几乎没有达成共识。问顶级学者(http://www.economist.com/node/21564175)为什么美国危机后的复苏如此缓慢(http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2012/10/polling-experts),你会得到许多不同的相互矛盾的答案(http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2012/10/polling-experts-0)。但是,这种普遍蔑视的最明显原因是,经济学家未能预测到大萧条以来最严重、最痛苦的经济衰退是可能发生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How We Got Here
MAINSTREAM macroeconomics has a pretty poor reputation these days, both among the public at large and among economists in other fields. This is hardly surprising. There is little consensus on even the most basic questions in macro. Ask top academics (http://www.economist.com/node/21564175) why America’s post-crisis recovery has been so slow (http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2012/10/polling-experts) and you will get many different conflicting answers (http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2012/10/polling-experts-0) . But the most obvious reason for the widespread disdain is that the profession failed to predict that the biggest and most painful downturn since the Great Depression was even possible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Section 1—Responsible Conduct Codes 1.01–1.13 How We Got Here
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1