对非洲民间社会组织外国资金限制的战略回应

I. Mathenge
{"title":"对非洲民间社会组织外国资金限制的战略回应","authors":"I. Mathenge","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3574322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The tussle between CSOs and governments on foreign funding is not going anytime soon. As long as the mandate of most CSOs remains to hold governments accountable, governments will look for ways to retaliate. Most African governments hate to account and it is for this reason that the tension will continue. These governments react by enacting restrictive laws on the funding of CSOs which should be viewed as a declaration of war on CSOs. In response, the CSOs must adopt a strategic response that is multifaceted and people-centred. This paper dismantles the smokescreen that governments use to hide their sinister motives in restricting CSOs' funding. It posits that the many reasons such as monitoring terrorism financing are pretentious. The paper also asses the effect of restriction on CSOs funding. It concludes the restriction though adverse to CSOs has no capacity to extinct them.","PeriodicalId":384705,"journal":{"name":"AARN: Civil Society & Social Movements (Sub-Topic)","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Strategic Response to the Restriction on Foreign Funding of the Civil Society Organisations in Africa\",\"authors\":\"I. Mathenge\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3574322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The tussle between CSOs and governments on foreign funding is not going anytime soon. As long as the mandate of most CSOs remains to hold governments accountable, governments will look for ways to retaliate. Most African governments hate to account and it is for this reason that the tension will continue. These governments react by enacting restrictive laws on the funding of CSOs which should be viewed as a declaration of war on CSOs. In response, the CSOs must adopt a strategic response that is multifaceted and people-centred. This paper dismantles the smokescreen that governments use to hide their sinister motives in restricting CSOs' funding. It posits that the many reasons such as monitoring terrorism financing are pretentious. The paper also asses the effect of restriction on CSOs funding. It concludes the restriction though adverse to CSOs has no capacity to extinct them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":384705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AARN: Civil Society & Social Movements (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AARN: Civil Society & Social Movements (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3574322\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AARN: Civil Society & Social Movements (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3574322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

民间社会组织和政府之间关于外国资金的争论不会很快结束。只要大多数公民社会组织的职责仍然是追究政府的责任,政府就会想方设法进行报复。大多数非洲国家的政府不愿承担责任,正因为如此,紧张局势将持续下去。这些政府的反应是制定限制公民社会组织资金的法律,这应该被视为对公民社会组织的宣战。作为回应,公民社会组织必须采取多方面和以人为本的战略应对措施。本文破除了政府在限制公民社会组织资助时用来掩盖其险恶动机的烟幕。它认为,监控恐怖主义融资等许多理由都是矫情的。本文还评估了限制对民间社会组织筹资的影响。结论是,限制虽然不利于民间社会组织,但没有消灭它们的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Strategic Response to the Restriction on Foreign Funding of the Civil Society Organisations in Africa
The tussle between CSOs and governments on foreign funding is not going anytime soon. As long as the mandate of most CSOs remains to hold governments accountable, governments will look for ways to retaliate. Most African governments hate to account and it is for this reason that the tension will continue. These governments react by enacting restrictive laws on the funding of CSOs which should be viewed as a declaration of war on CSOs. In response, the CSOs must adopt a strategic response that is multifaceted and people-centred. This paper dismantles the smokescreen that governments use to hide their sinister motives in restricting CSOs' funding. It posits that the many reasons such as monitoring terrorism financing are pretentious. The paper also asses the effect of restriction on CSOs funding. It concludes the restriction though adverse to CSOs has no capacity to extinct them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Strategic Response to the Restriction on Foreign Funding of the Civil Society Organisations in Africa BIM Technology Usage in Intelligent Management of Precast Concrete Structures La Cooperazione come Strumento di Emancipazione delle Classi Lavoratrici nel Pensiero degli Economisti Inglesi del XIX Secolo (Cooperation As an Emancipation Tool for Working Classes in the Thought of the 19th Century English Economists) Социология Общественных Движений – Основные Подходы (Sociology of Social Movements – Main Approaches) Shall We Riot Too? The Geographical Neighbor Impact on Political Instability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1