定义创业理念完整性的标准

Sobakinova Donata, Yan Zhou
{"title":"定义创业理念完整性的标准","authors":"Sobakinova Donata, Yan Zhou","doi":"10.1109/ICMSE.2017.8574447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines aspects of the assessment and selection of entrepreneurial ideas. Since there currently exist a fairly large number of evaluation mechanisms and selection criteria for entrepreneurial ideas, the article presents a system for initial “filtering” of these ideas by fairly simple criteria. The proposed evaluation system will allow an idea to be evaluated quantitatively (using a points system) for “viability”, and thus compared with other ideas. The selection system proposed will make it possible to take to the “second level” (that of consideration and approval) only those ideas that are truly feasible under given economic, market and social conditions. The system presented is based on a number of different approaches to idea evaluation, and these are also analyzed in the article. In addition, the article gives an overall description of approaches to the understanding of the entrepreneurial idea and its role in the organization and effectiveness of business activity.","PeriodicalId":275033,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering (ICMSE)","volume":"373 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining Criteria for Completeness of Entrepreneurial Ideas\",\"authors\":\"Sobakinova Donata, Yan Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICMSE.2017.8574447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines aspects of the assessment and selection of entrepreneurial ideas. Since there currently exist a fairly large number of evaluation mechanisms and selection criteria for entrepreneurial ideas, the article presents a system for initial “filtering” of these ideas by fairly simple criteria. The proposed evaluation system will allow an idea to be evaluated quantitatively (using a points system) for “viability”, and thus compared with other ideas. The selection system proposed will make it possible to take to the “second level” (that of consideration and approval) only those ideas that are truly feasible under given economic, market and social conditions. The system presented is based on a number of different approaches to idea evaluation, and these are also analyzed in the article. In addition, the article gives an overall description of approaches to the understanding of the entrepreneurial idea and its role in the organization and effectiveness of business activity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering (ICMSE)\",\"volume\":\"373 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering (ICMSE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSE.2017.8574447\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering (ICMSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMSE.2017.8574447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文考察了评估和选择创业理念的各个方面。由于目前存在着相当多的创业理念评价机制和选择标准,本文提出了一个以相当简单的标准对这些理念进行初步“过滤”的系统。拟议的评估系统将允许对一个想法的“可行性”进行定量评估(使用积分系统),从而与其他想法进行比较。这种选拔制度将使那些在特定的经济、市场和社会条件下真正可行的想法才有可能进入“第二阶段”(审议和批准)。本文提出的系统是基于多种不同的思想评价方法,并对这些方法进行了分析。此外,本文还全面描述了理解创业理念的方法及其在商业活动的组织和有效性中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Defining Criteria for Completeness of Entrepreneurial Ideas
This article examines aspects of the assessment and selection of entrepreneurial ideas. Since there currently exist a fairly large number of evaluation mechanisms and selection criteria for entrepreneurial ideas, the article presents a system for initial “filtering” of these ideas by fairly simple criteria. The proposed evaluation system will allow an idea to be evaluated quantitatively (using a points system) for “viability”, and thus compared with other ideas. The selection system proposed will make it possible to take to the “second level” (that of consideration and approval) only those ideas that are truly feasible under given economic, market and social conditions. The system presented is based on a number of different approaches to idea evaluation, and these are also analyzed in the article. In addition, the article gives an overall description of approaches to the understanding of the entrepreneurial idea and its role in the organization and effectiveness of business activity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experience-Centric Service Cooperation Strategies and Pricing Strategies in a Dual-Channel Supply Chain Innovation Management Mechanism Comparative Study on China-USA-Russia National Defense-Related Science and Technology Industry Does the Stakeholder Drive Knowledge Transfer in Innovation Ecosystem? -A View from Institutional Legitimacy Perspective Impact of Work Engagement and Innovative Work Behavior on Organizational Performance; Moderating Role of Perceived Distributive Fairness What is the Value of the Online Retailer's Demand Forecast Information Sharing?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1