块匹配与光流运动估计算法的比较研究

J. Philip, Binoshi Samuvel, K. Pradeesh, N. K. Nimmi
{"title":"块匹配与光流运动估计算法的比较研究","authors":"J. Philip, Binoshi Samuvel, K. Pradeesh, N. K. Nimmi","doi":"10.1109/AICERA.2014.6908204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Block matching and optical flow algorithms are the two major motion estimation techniques that are widely employed today. The main aim of this paper is to compare the above two algorithms in terms of processing time, Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR), Structural Similarity (SSIM) and Mean Opinion Score (MOS). An exhaustive search block matching algorithm which has the maximum efficiency compared to any other block matching algorithm as well as the Brox's optical flow estimation algorithm are implemented. The algorithms are optimized by selecting appropriate parameter values that gives the best result. Then the algorithms are compared based on their motion estimated image for the same input image sequence and finally the results obtained are analyzed.","PeriodicalId":425226,"journal":{"name":"2014 Annual International Conference on Emerging Research Areas: Magnetics, Machines and Drives (AICERA/iCMMD)","volume":"416 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of block matching and optical flow motion estimation algorithms\",\"authors\":\"J. Philip, Binoshi Samuvel, K. Pradeesh, N. K. Nimmi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AICERA.2014.6908204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Block matching and optical flow algorithms are the two major motion estimation techniques that are widely employed today. The main aim of this paper is to compare the above two algorithms in terms of processing time, Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR), Structural Similarity (SSIM) and Mean Opinion Score (MOS). An exhaustive search block matching algorithm which has the maximum efficiency compared to any other block matching algorithm as well as the Brox's optical flow estimation algorithm are implemented. The algorithms are optimized by selecting appropriate parameter values that gives the best result. Then the algorithms are compared based on their motion estimated image for the same input image sequence and finally the results obtained are analyzed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":425226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 Annual International Conference on Emerging Research Areas: Magnetics, Machines and Drives (AICERA/iCMMD)\",\"volume\":\"416 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 Annual International Conference on Emerging Research Areas: Magnetics, Machines and Drives (AICERA/iCMMD)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AICERA.2014.6908204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 Annual International Conference on Emerging Research Areas: Magnetics, Machines and Drives (AICERA/iCMMD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AICERA.2014.6908204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

块匹配和光流算法是目前应用最广泛的两种运动估计技术。本文的主要目的是比较上述两种算法在处理时间、峰值信噪比(PSNR)、结构相似度(SSIM)和平均意见评分(MOS)方面的差异。实现了一种与其他块匹配算法相比效率最高的穷举搜索块匹配算法以及Brox光流估计算法。通过选择适当的参数值来优化算法,从而获得最佳结果。然后在相同输入图像序列下,基于运动估计图像对两种算法进行比较,最后对所得结果进行分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparative study of block matching and optical flow motion estimation algorithms
Block matching and optical flow algorithms are the two major motion estimation techniques that are widely employed today. The main aim of this paper is to compare the above two algorithms in terms of processing time, Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR), Structural Similarity (SSIM) and Mean Opinion Score (MOS). An exhaustive search block matching algorithm which has the maximum efficiency compared to any other block matching algorithm as well as the Brox's optical flow estimation algorithm are implemented. The algorithms are optimized by selecting appropriate parameter values that gives the best result. Then the algorithms are compared based on their motion estimated image for the same input image sequence and finally the results obtained are analyzed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An improved indirect vector controlled current source inverter fed induction motor drive with rotor resistance adaptation Reconstruction of cloud contaminated information in optical satellite images Comparison of capacitor voltage balancing techniques in multilevel inverters Step modulated multilevel inverter incorporated upon ANFIS based intelligent PV MPPT Sub- 0.18μm low leakage and high performance dynamic logic wide fan-in gates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1