诉讼费用监测与根除司法腐败行为

Z. Aditya, Sholahuddin Al-Fatih
{"title":"诉讼费用监测与根除司法腐败行为","authors":"Z. Aditya, Sholahuddin Al-Fatih","doi":"10.15294/ijals.v2i2.38148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Judicial corruption practices in Indonesia have been going on for long time. Even, according to Transparency International survey (2007), the judiciary in Indonesia ranks highest for corruption perception index. Not only that, the mode used by the judicial mafia is also increasingly modern and occurs almost in all aspects of judiciary. This research has two aims, namely: (1) to know and analyze the mode of corruption in the judicial process in Indonesia, and (2) to know and analyze the model of litigation cost control in the judicial process in Indonesia. This research is juricial-normative research which are using the statute approach and conceptual approach. From this research, it can be seen that, Typically, corrupt practices have been initiated since the registration of the cases, the establishment of judges panel, summoning witnesses and experts, negotiationg decisions and cost of copy of the decisions. Ironically, many parties are involved in the judicial corruption practices ranging from clerks, officials and employess in the judiciary and the judges themselves. However, the more modern technology can be used as an alternative solution in combating the practices of judicial corruption. One of them, by applying litigation cost control that can be integrated through whistleblowing system. In this way, the public can monitoring in real-time the trial process starting from registration fee litigation, the process of litigation until post-verdict.","PeriodicalId":333015,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monitoring of Litigation Costs and Efforts to Eradicate Judicial Corruption Practices\",\"authors\":\"Z. Aditya, Sholahuddin Al-Fatih\",\"doi\":\"10.15294/ijals.v2i2.38148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Judicial corruption practices in Indonesia have been going on for long time. Even, according to Transparency International survey (2007), the judiciary in Indonesia ranks highest for corruption perception index. Not only that, the mode used by the judicial mafia is also increasingly modern and occurs almost in all aspects of judiciary. This research has two aims, namely: (1) to know and analyze the mode of corruption in the judicial process in Indonesia, and (2) to know and analyze the model of litigation cost control in the judicial process in Indonesia. This research is juricial-normative research which are using the statute approach and conceptual approach. From this research, it can be seen that, Typically, corrupt practices have been initiated since the registration of the cases, the establishment of judges panel, summoning witnesses and experts, negotiationg decisions and cost of copy of the decisions. Ironically, many parties are involved in the judicial corruption practices ranging from clerks, officials and employess in the judiciary and the judges themselves. However, the more modern technology can be used as an alternative solution in combating the practices of judicial corruption. One of them, by applying litigation cost control that can be integrated through whistleblowing system. In this way, the public can monitoring in real-time the trial process starting from registration fee litigation, the process of litigation until post-verdict.\",\"PeriodicalId\":333015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15294/ijals.v2i2.38148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/ijals.v2i2.38148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

印尼的司法腐败现象由来已久。甚至,根据透明国际(Transparency International) 2007年的调查,印尼的司法机构在腐败感知指数上排名最高。不仅如此,司法黑手党所使用的模式也越来越现代化,几乎出现在司法的各个方面。本研究有两个目的,即:(1)了解并分析印尼司法过程中的腐败模式;(2)了解并分析印尼司法过程中的诉讼成本控制模式。本研究是运用法规研究方法和概念研究方法进行的司法规范研究。从本研究中可以看出,典型的腐败行为是从案件登记、成立审判团、传唤证人和专家、谈判决定和决定副本成本开始的。具有讽刺意味的是,从司法机关的职员、官员和雇员到法官本身,许多当事人都参与了司法腐败行为。然而,更现代的技术可以作为打击司法腐败行为的另一种解决办法。其中之一是通过举报人制度整合诉讼成本控制。通过这种方式,公众可以实时监控从挂号费诉讼开始的审判过程,直到判决后的诉讼过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Monitoring of Litigation Costs and Efforts to Eradicate Judicial Corruption Practices
Judicial corruption practices in Indonesia have been going on for long time. Even, according to Transparency International survey (2007), the judiciary in Indonesia ranks highest for corruption perception index. Not only that, the mode used by the judicial mafia is also increasingly modern and occurs almost in all aspects of judiciary. This research has two aims, namely: (1) to know and analyze the mode of corruption in the judicial process in Indonesia, and (2) to know and analyze the model of litigation cost control in the judicial process in Indonesia. This research is juricial-normative research which are using the statute approach and conceptual approach. From this research, it can be seen that, Typically, corrupt practices have been initiated since the registration of the cases, the establishment of judges panel, summoning witnesses and experts, negotiationg decisions and cost of copy of the decisions. Ironically, many parties are involved in the judicial corruption practices ranging from clerks, officials and employess in the judiciary and the judges themselves. However, the more modern technology can be used as an alternative solution in combating the practices of judicial corruption. One of them, by applying litigation cost control that can be integrated through whistleblowing system. In this way, the public can monitoring in real-time the trial process starting from registration fee litigation, the process of litigation until post-verdict.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Legal Formulation of Telemedicine Implementation as the Prevention of Malpractice Risk for Patients Improving the Professionalism of Human Resources for the Indonesian National Police through Strengthening Supervision Discourse of Violence and Rights Violation in Child Marriage Advocacy on Combating Hunger: Political Will of the Kedunggebang Village Government to Implement Banyuwangi Tanggap Stunting Programs in 2022 Prevention of Theft with Aggravated Circumstances at Semarang City
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1