RF-DC电压标准差异的实验研究

D. Huang, Shui-Zhi He
{"title":"RF-DC电压标准差异的实验研究","authors":"D. Huang, Shui-Zhi He","doi":"10.1109/IMTC.1989.36845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The RF-DC differences (d) of primary voltage standards were determined by experimental and theoretical procedures. The voltage standards, with different operating principles and designs, have been compared with CTVCs (coaxial thermal voltage converters) at frequencies from 1 to 100 MHz. The method recommended for determining the d values is to derive an empirical formula and then to correct if from measured data. The uncertainty of primary voltage standards established by this method is +or-0.007% at 1 MHz, +or-0.01% at 3 MHz, +or-0.02% at 10 MHz, 0.07% at 30 MHz, +or-0.15% at 50 MHz, and +or-0.2% at 100 MHz. This specification is shown to be reliable while leaving sufficient margin for error.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":298343,"journal":{"name":"6th IEEE Conference Record., Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference","volume":"561 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental studies of the RF-DC differences of voltage standards\",\"authors\":\"D. Huang, Shui-Zhi He\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IMTC.1989.36845\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The RF-DC differences (d) of primary voltage standards were determined by experimental and theoretical procedures. The voltage standards, with different operating principles and designs, have been compared with CTVCs (coaxial thermal voltage converters) at frequencies from 1 to 100 MHz. The method recommended for determining the d values is to derive an empirical formula and then to correct if from measured data. The uncertainty of primary voltage standards established by this method is +or-0.007% at 1 MHz, +or-0.01% at 3 MHz, +or-0.02% at 10 MHz, 0.07% at 30 MHz, +or-0.15% at 50 MHz, and +or-0.2% at 100 MHz. This specification is shown to be reliable while leaving sufficient margin for error.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":298343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"6th IEEE Conference Record., Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference\",\"volume\":\"561 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"6th IEEE Conference Record., Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMTC.1989.36845\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"6th IEEE Conference Record., Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMTC.1989.36845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

主要电压标准的RF-DC差(d)通过实验和理论方法确定。在1到100mhz的频率范围内,将具有不同工作原理和设计的电压标准与ctvc(同轴热电压转换器)进行了比较。推荐的确定d值的方法是推导一个经验公式,然后根据测量数据对其进行修正。该方法建立的初级电压标准的不确定度在1 MHz时为+or-0.007%,在3 MHz时为+or-0.01%,在10 MHz时为+or-0.02%,在30 MHz时为0.07%,在50 MHz时为+or-0.15%,在100 MHz时为+or-0.2%。本规范被证明是可靠的,同时留有足够的误差余地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experimental studies of the RF-DC differences of voltage standards
The RF-DC differences (d) of primary voltage standards were determined by experimental and theoretical procedures. The voltage standards, with different operating principles and designs, have been compared with CTVCs (coaxial thermal voltage converters) at frequencies from 1 to 100 MHz. The method recommended for determining the d values is to derive an empirical formula and then to correct if from measured data. The uncertainty of primary voltage standards established by this method is +or-0.007% at 1 MHz, +or-0.01% at 3 MHz, +or-0.02% at 10 MHz, 0.07% at 30 MHz, +or-0.15% at 50 MHz, and +or-0.2% at 100 MHz. This specification is shown to be reliable while leaving sufficient margin for error.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A high-current, very-wide-band transconductance amplifier New in-situ calibration of diode detectors used in six-port network analyzers An expert ECG acquisition and analysis system Recent developments in digital oscilloscopes Tactile sensing for space robotics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1