M. Shafiei, N. Baghian, Amin Salehi, M. Ranjbar, Maryam Hajipour
{"title":"伊朗卫生保健系统组织公平感现状调查系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"M. Shafiei, N. Baghian, Amin Salehi, M. Ranjbar, Maryam Hajipour","doi":"10.18502/mshsj.v6i1.6509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Perceived organizational justice is a concept used to describe job-related justice. Considering the role of perceived organizational justice in the healthcare system to increase the satisfaction, motivation, and efficiency in providing quality services, this study was conducted to investigate the situation of perceived organizational justice in the Iranian healthcare system through systematic review. \nMethods: In the present study, an electronic search was conducted on the Persian websites SID, Iranmedex, Medlib, civilica, Irandoc and English Web of science, Pubmed, Scopus, and Google scholar using the Persian and English keywords of ‘Justice, Equality, Equality, Organizational Justice, Perceived Justice, Health System, University of Medical Sciences, Health Centers, Hospitals. As a result, 520 articles were studied and evaluated step by step and 469 papers were removed after reading the title and abstract. Finally, the full text of 51 articles was reviewed. Finally, 30 articles that measured the average level of perceived organizational justice were selected and other articles were excluded due to lack of necessary criteria and irrelevance. To analyze the heterogeneity between the studies, the meta-analysis method was used using Stata 14 software and Q test and I2 index. \nResults: To study the status of perceived organizational justice in the health care system in a systematic and meta-analysis, all 30 studies were illegible. With regard to the dimensions of distributive, procedural, and interactive justice, 23 studies of 30 studies had the required conditions to enter the research. The total mean score of perceived organizational justice was obtained as 60.71 and the mean scores of 54.74, 58.52, and 62.41were calculated for dimensions of distributive, procedural, and interactive justice, respectively. \nConclusion: The findings showed that the situation of perceived organizational justice in the Iranian health care system was favorable. The dimension of interactive justice, related to managers' behaviors and relationships with employees, was relatively more favorable than other dimensions of organizational justice. Moreover, the situation of perceived organizational justice and its dimensions in private hospitals was more favorable than other research environments, including public hospitals, staff units, and hospitals selected using the mixed method.","PeriodicalId":324632,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Management Strategies in Health System","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survey the Situation of Perceived Organizational Justice in the Iranian Health Care System; A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"M. Shafiei, N. Baghian, Amin Salehi, M. Ranjbar, Maryam Hajipour\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/mshsj.v6i1.6509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Perceived organizational justice is a concept used to describe job-related justice. Considering the role of perceived organizational justice in the healthcare system to increase the satisfaction, motivation, and efficiency in providing quality services, this study was conducted to investigate the situation of perceived organizational justice in the Iranian healthcare system through systematic review. \\nMethods: In the present study, an electronic search was conducted on the Persian websites SID, Iranmedex, Medlib, civilica, Irandoc and English Web of science, Pubmed, Scopus, and Google scholar using the Persian and English keywords of ‘Justice, Equality, Equality, Organizational Justice, Perceived Justice, Health System, University of Medical Sciences, Health Centers, Hospitals. As a result, 520 articles were studied and evaluated step by step and 469 papers were removed after reading the title and abstract. Finally, the full text of 51 articles was reviewed. Finally, 30 articles that measured the average level of perceived organizational justice were selected and other articles were excluded due to lack of necessary criteria and irrelevance. To analyze the heterogeneity between the studies, the meta-analysis method was used using Stata 14 software and Q test and I2 index. \\nResults: To study the status of perceived organizational justice in the health care system in a systematic and meta-analysis, all 30 studies were illegible. With regard to the dimensions of distributive, procedural, and interactive justice, 23 studies of 30 studies had the required conditions to enter the research. The total mean score of perceived organizational justice was obtained as 60.71 and the mean scores of 54.74, 58.52, and 62.41were calculated for dimensions of distributive, procedural, and interactive justice, respectively. \\nConclusion: The findings showed that the situation of perceived organizational justice in the Iranian health care system was favorable. The dimension of interactive justice, related to managers' behaviors and relationships with employees, was relatively more favorable than other dimensions of organizational justice. Moreover, the situation of perceived organizational justice and its dimensions in private hospitals was more favorable than other research environments, including public hospitals, staff units, and hospitals selected using the mixed method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":324632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Journal of Management Strategies in Health System\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Journal of Management Strategies in Health System\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/mshsj.v6i1.6509\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Management Strategies in Health System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/mshsj.v6i1.6509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:组织公平感是描述工作相关公平感的一个概念。考虑到组织公平感在医疗保健系统中提高满意度、提供优质服务的动机和效率的作用,本研究通过系统回顾来调查伊朗医疗保健系统中组织公平感的情况。方法:以“Justice, Equality, Equality, Organizational Justice, Perceived Justice, Health System, University of Medical Sciences, Health Centers, Hospitals”为关键词,在波斯语网站SID、Iranmedex、Medlib、civilica、Irandoc和英文Web of science、Pubmed、Scopus和Google scholar上进行检索。结果,对520篇论文进行了逐级研究和评价,在阅读标题和摘要后,删除了469篇论文。最后对51篇文章的全文进行了综述。最后,选择了30篇测量感知组织公正平均水平的文章,其他文章由于缺乏必要的标准和不相关而被排除在外。为分析各研究间的异质性,采用meta分析方法,采用Stata 14软件、Q检验和I2指数。结果:在系统和荟萃分析中研究卫生保健系统中感知组织公正的状况,所有30项研究都是难以辨认的。在分配正义、程序正义和互动正义三个维度上,30项研究中有23项研究符合进入研究的条件。组织公平感的总平均得分为60.71分,分配公平感、程序公平感和互动公平感的平均得分分别为54.74分、58.52分和62.41分。结论:研究结果表明,伊朗卫生保健系统的组织公平感状况良好。与管理者行为和员工关系相关的互动公平维度相对于组织公平的其他维度更为有利。此外,私立医院的组织公平感及其维度状况优于其他研究环境,包括公立医院、员工单位和使用混合方法选择的医院。
Survey the Situation of Perceived Organizational Justice in the Iranian Health Care System; A systematic review and meta-analysis
Background: Perceived organizational justice is a concept used to describe job-related justice. Considering the role of perceived organizational justice in the healthcare system to increase the satisfaction, motivation, and efficiency in providing quality services, this study was conducted to investigate the situation of perceived organizational justice in the Iranian healthcare system through systematic review.
Methods: In the present study, an electronic search was conducted on the Persian websites SID, Iranmedex, Medlib, civilica, Irandoc and English Web of science, Pubmed, Scopus, and Google scholar using the Persian and English keywords of ‘Justice, Equality, Equality, Organizational Justice, Perceived Justice, Health System, University of Medical Sciences, Health Centers, Hospitals. As a result, 520 articles were studied and evaluated step by step and 469 papers were removed after reading the title and abstract. Finally, the full text of 51 articles was reviewed. Finally, 30 articles that measured the average level of perceived organizational justice were selected and other articles were excluded due to lack of necessary criteria and irrelevance. To analyze the heterogeneity between the studies, the meta-analysis method was used using Stata 14 software and Q test and I2 index.
Results: To study the status of perceived organizational justice in the health care system in a systematic and meta-analysis, all 30 studies were illegible. With regard to the dimensions of distributive, procedural, and interactive justice, 23 studies of 30 studies had the required conditions to enter the research. The total mean score of perceived organizational justice was obtained as 60.71 and the mean scores of 54.74, 58.52, and 62.41were calculated for dimensions of distributive, procedural, and interactive justice, respectively.
Conclusion: The findings showed that the situation of perceived organizational justice in the Iranian health care system was favorable. The dimension of interactive justice, related to managers' behaviors and relationships with employees, was relatively more favorable than other dimensions of organizational justice. Moreover, the situation of perceived organizational justice and its dimensions in private hospitals was more favorable than other research environments, including public hospitals, staff units, and hospitals selected using the mixed method.