宗教自由、宪法第109条和反歧视法

N. Foster
{"title":"宗教自由、宪法第109条和反歧视法","authors":"N. Foster","doi":"10.55803/c59x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many Australian anti-discrimination statutes contain special provisions to balance equality with religious freedom. However, if these religious freedom provisions in state anti-discrimination laws are narrowed too much, the laws may become inoperative by virtue of s 109 of the Australian Constitution, which says that an inconsistency between State and Commonwealth law shall be resolved in favour of the latter. This article explores the relationship between religious freedom, s 109 of the Australian Constitution, and anti-discrimination laws. It concludes that, to avoid constitutional difficulty, states should ensure religious freedom provisions in their anti-discrimination statutes are at least as wide in scope and effect as that provided by the Commonwealth in its antidiscrimination statutes.","PeriodicalId":118952,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Law and Religion","volume":"223 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Religious Freedom, Section 109 of the Constitution, and Anti-discrimination Laws\",\"authors\":\"N. Foster\",\"doi\":\"10.55803/c59x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many Australian anti-discrimination statutes contain special provisions to balance equality with religious freedom. However, if these religious freedom provisions in state anti-discrimination laws are narrowed too much, the laws may become inoperative by virtue of s 109 of the Australian Constitution, which says that an inconsistency between State and Commonwealth law shall be resolved in favour of the latter. This article explores the relationship between religious freedom, s 109 of the Australian Constitution, and anti-discrimination laws. It concludes that, to avoid constitutional difficulty, states should ensure religious freedom provisions in their anti-discrimination statutes are at least as wide in scope and effect as that provided by the Commonwealth in its antidiscrimination statutes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":118952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Law and Religion\",\"volume\":\"223 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Law and Religion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55803/c59x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Law and Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55803/c59x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

澳大利亚许多反歧视法规都载有平衡平等与宗教自由的特别规定。然而,如果州反歧视法中的这些宗教自由条款被缩得太窄,那么根据《澳大利亚宪法》第109条,这些法律可能会失效,该条规定,州法和联邦法之间的不一致应以有利于后者的方式加以解决。本文探讨了澳大利亚宪法第109条宗教自由与反歧视法之间的关系。它的结论是,为了避免宪法上的困难,各州应确保其反歧视法规中的宗教自由条款在范围和效力上至少与英联邦反歧视法规中规定的范围和效力一样广泛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Religious Freedom, Section 109 of the Constitution, and Anti-discrimination Laws
Many Australian anti-discrimination statutes contain special provisions to balance equality with religious freedom. However, if these religious freedom provisions in state anti-discrimination laws are narrowed too much, the laws may become inoperative by virtue of s 109 of the Australian Constitution, which says that an inconsistency between State and Commonwealth law shall be resolved in favour of the latter. This article explores the relationship between religious freedom, s 109 of the Australian Constitution, and anti-discrimination laws. It concludes that, to avoid constitutional difficulty, states should ensure religious freedom provisions in their anti-discrimination statutes are at least as wide in scope and effect as that provided by the Commonwealth in its antidiscrimination statutes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Proportionality in Australian Constitutional Law: Next Stop Section 116? Book Review: "Christians: The Urgent Case for Jesus in Our World" Law and Religion in the Classroom: Teaching Church-State Relationships Conversion Practices Legislation in Victoria -- A Potential Crisis for Church Authority? The Liberal and Post-Liberal Futures of Law and Religion in Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1