波兰不同规模和类型农场的技术效率

A. Kagan
{"title":"波兰不同规模和类型农场的技术效率","authors":"A. Kagan","doi":"10.30858/zer/115188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents technical efficiency of the use of production resources for the research sample of the Polish FADN, representing the general population of agricultural holdings, representing over 90% of domestic commercial production. The impact of the size of activity measured by the utilised agricultural area and standard output (economic size), and of the production type on the efficiency was examined. In all cases, non-linear relationships were found, and the technical efficiency curve for grouping characteristics based on the size of the activity took the U shape. Therefore, deviations from the shape of these relations observed in numerous studies may result not only from the selection of the measurement method, but also from the lack of representativeness for the entire agrarian structure of researched farms. Assessing the impact of production orientation on technical efficiency without taking into account the diversity of groups in terms of the size of activity, especially with different assignments to different classes of economic size, in many cases may lead to erroneous conclusions.","PeriodicalId":105811,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Modeling: Agriculture","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technical Efficiency of Farms in Poland According to Their Sizes and Types\",\"authors\":\"A. Kagan\",\"doi\":\"10.30858/zer/115188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article presents technical efficiency of the use of production resources for the research sample of the Polish FADN, representing the general population of agricultural holdings, representing over 90% of domestic commercial production. The impact of the size of activity measured by the utilised agricultural area and standard output (economic size), and of the production type on the efficiency was examined. In all cases, non-linear relationships were found, and the technical efficiency curve for grouping characteristics based on the size of the activity took the U shape. Therefore, deviations from the shape of these relations observed in numerous studies may result not only from the selection of the measurement method, but also from the lack of representativeness for the entire agrarian structure of researched farms. Assessing the impact of production orientation on technical efficiency without taking into account the diversity of groups in terms of the size of activity, especially with different assignments to different classes of economic size, in many cases may lead to erroneous conclusions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":105811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Econometric Modeling: Agriculture\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Econometric Modeling: Agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30858/zer/115188\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Modeling: Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30858/zer/115188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文以波兰FADN为研究样本,展示了生产资源利用的技术效率,代表了农业控股的一般人口,占国内商业生产的90%以上。考察了利用农业面积和标准产出(经济规模)衡量的活动规模以及生产类型对效率的影响。在所有情况下,都发现了非线性关系,并且基于活动规模的分组特征的技术效率曲线呈U形。因此,在许多研究中观察到的这些关系的形状出现偏差,可能不仅是因为测量方法的选择,而且还因为所研究农场的整个农业结构缺乏代表性。在评估生产导向对技术效率的影响时,如果不考虑到不同群体在活动规模方面的差异,特别是对不同经济规模类别的不同分配,在许多情况下可能会导致错误的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Technical Efficiency of Farms in Poland According to Their Sizes and Types
The article presents technical efficiency of the use of production resources for the research sample of the Polish FADN, representing the general population of agricultural holdings, representing over 90% of domestic commercial production. The impact of the size of activity measured by the utilised agricultural area and standard output (economic size), and of the production type on the efficiency was examined. In all cases, non-linear relationships were found, and the technical efficiency curve for grouping characteristics based on the size of the activity took the U shape. Therefore, deviations from the shape of these relations observed in numerous studies may result not only from the selection of the measurement method, but also from the lack of representativeness for the entire agrarian structure of researched farms. Assessing the impact of production orientation on technical efficiency without taking into account the diversity of groups in terms of the size of activity, especially with different assignments to different classes of economic size, in many cases may lead to erroneous conclusions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Race and Environmental Worries Climate Change and (a Culture of) Cooperation in the World's Most Agricultural Countries. Strengthening Gender Justice in a Just Transition: A Research Agenda Based on a Systematic Map of Gender in Coal Transitions Demand Shocks and Supply Chain Resilience: An Agent Based Modelling Approach and Application to the Potato Supply Chain Oil Shocks and the U.S. Economy in a Data-rich Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1