{"title":"三种商业信息可视化系统的实证比较","authors":"A. Kobsa","doi":"10.1109/INFVIS.2001.963289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An empirical comparison of three commercial information visualization systems on three different databases is presented. The systems use different paradigms for visualizing data. Tasks were selected to be \"ecologically relevant\", i.e. meaningful and interesting in the respec- tive domains. Users of one system turned out to solve problems significantly faster than users of the other two, while users of another system would supply significantly more correct answers. Reasons for these results and general observations about the studied systems are discussed.","PeriodicalId":131263,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2001. INFOVIS 2001.","volume":"2021 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"112","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An empirical comparison of three commercial information visualization systems\",\"authors\":\"A. Kobsa\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INFVIS.2001.963289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An empirical comparison of three commercial information visualization systems on three different databases is presented. The systems use different paradigms for visualizing data. Tasks were selected to be \\\"ecologically relevant\\\", i.e. meaningful and interesting in the respec- tive domains. Users of one system turned out to solve problems significantly faster than users of the other two, while users of another system would supply significantly more correct answers. Reasons for these results and general observations about the studied systems are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":131263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2001. INFOVIS 2001.\",\"volume\":\"2021 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"112\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2001. INFOVIS 2001.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFVIS.2001.963289\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2001. INFOVIS 2001.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFVIS.2001.963289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
An empirical comparison of three commercial information visualization systems
An empirical comparison of three commercial information visualization systems on three different databases is presented. The systems use different paradigms for visualizing data. Tasks were selected to be "ecologically relevant", i.e. meaningful and interesting in the respec- tive domains. Users of one system turned out to solve problems significantly faster than users of the other two, while users of another system would supply significantly more correct answers. Reasons for these results and general observations about the studied systems are discussed.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
