{"title":"系统设计和集成的合同挑战","authors":"Mischa Möstl, R. Ernst","doi":"10.1145/3166227.3166236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we highlight challenges of the applicability of contracting (based on assumptions and guarantees) for cyber-physical systems design. We illustrate in an example the limitations of an entirely composability-centered contracting approach. An alternative approach is subsequently proposed and applied to the presented example to illustrate that it is capable of handling the limitations demonstrated for the composable approach.","PeriodicalId":447904,"journal":{"name":"SIGBED Rev.","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contracting challenges for system design and integration\",\"authors\":\"Mischa Möstl, R. Ernst\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3166227.3166236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we highlight challenges of the applicability of contracting (based on assumptions and guarantees) for cyber-physical systems design. We illustrate in an example the limitations of an entirely composability-centered contracting approach. An alternative approach is subsequently proposed and applied to the presented example to illustrate that it is capable of handling the limitations demonstrated for the composable approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SIGBED Rev.\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SIGBED Rev.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3166227.3166236\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGBED Rev.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3166227.3166236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Contracting challenges for system design and integration
In this paper we highlight challenges of the applicability of contracting (based on assumptions and guarantees) for cyber-physical systems design. We illustrate in an example the limitations of an entirely composability-centered contracting approach. An alternative approach is subsequently proposed and applied to the presented example to illustrate that it is capable of handling the limitations demonstrated for the composable approach.