从历史的角度看南高加索前伊朗土地的问题

Natalia Hrychorczuk
{"title":"从历史的角度看南高加索前伊朗土地的问题","authors":"Natalia Hrychorczuk","doi":"10.32690/1230-1604/hrychorczuk","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the issue of Iranian lands in the South Caucasus – from ancient\ntimes to the fall of the Transcaucasian Democratic Federative Republic. The South\nCaucasus was shown as one geopolitical entity that was ruled by neighboring powers,\nincluding Iran, Russia, and Turkey over the years. The author proves that relations between\nregional countries are deeply rooted in the historical background which causes\ndifferent historiographies. Due to the fact historiography is used in politics and territorial\nclaims, Armenian and Iranian historiographies are opposed to Azerbaijani’s official\nnarrative. The author’s main goal was to underline the historical context of contemporary\nIranian-Azerbaijani relations as well as the specificity of Iran’s historical contacts\nwith the countries and peoples of the South Caucasus.","PeriodicalId":124291,"journal":{"name":"Pro Georgia","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE PROBLEM OF THE FORMER IRANIAN\\nLANDS OF THE SOUTH CAUCASUS FROM\\nA HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE\",\"authors\":\"Natalia Hrychorczuk\",\"doi\":\"10.32690/1230-1604/hrychorczuk\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article presents the issue of Iranian lands in the South Caucasus – from ancient\\ntimes to the fall of the Transcaucasian Democratic Federative Republic. The South\\nCaucasus was shown as one geopolitical entity that was ruled by neighboring powers,\\nincluding Iran, Russia, and Turkey over the years. The author proves that relations between\\nregional countries are deeply rooted in the historical background which causes\\ndifferent historiographies. Due to the fact historiography is used in politics and territorial\\nclaims, Armenian and Iranian historiographies are opposed to Azerbaijani’s official\\nnarrative. The author’s main goal was to underline the historical context of contemporary\\nIranian-Azerbaijani relations as well as the specificity of Iran’s historical contacts\\nwith the countries and peoples of the South Caucasus.\",\"PeriodicalId\":124291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pro Georgia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pro Georgia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32690/1230-1604/hrychorczuk\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pro Georgia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32690/1230-1604/hrychorczuk","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章介绍了伊朗在南高加索的土地问题-从古代到外高加索民主联邦共和国的垮台。南高加索地区被视为一个地缘政治实体,多年来被包括伊朗、俄罗斯和土耳其在内的邻国统治。作者证明,地区国家之间的关系深深植根于造成不同史学的历史背景。由于史学被用于政治和领土主张,亚美尼亚和伊朗的史学反对阿塞拜疆的官方叙述。作者的主要目的是强调当代伊朗-阿塞拜疆关系的历史背景,以及伊朗与南高加索国家和人民的历史接触的特殊性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE PROBLEM OF THE FORMER IRANIAN LANDS OF THE SOUTH CAUCASUS FROM A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
The article presents the issue of Iranian lands in the South Caucasus – from ancient times to the fall of the Transcaucasian Democratic Federative Republic. The South Caucasus was shown as one geopolitical entity that was ruled by neighboring powers, including Iran, Russia, and Turkey over the years. The author proves that relations between regional countries are deeply rooted in the historical background which causes different historiographies. Due to the fact historiography is used in politics and territorial claims, Armenian and Iranian historiographies are opposed to Azerbaijani’s official narrative. The author’s main goal was to underline the historical context of contemporary Iranian-Azerbaijani relations as well as the specificity of Iran’s historical contacts with the countries and peoples of the South Caucasus.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
REPORT FROM THE SEMINAR OF THE POLISH-GEORGIAN HISTORIANS’ COMMISSION NATIONAL IDENTITY AND GEORGIAN UNITY IN THE 8TH-9TH CENTURIES KSIĄDZ, KTÓREGO PARAFIĄ JEST EUROPA… Wizyta dr Grzegorza Peradze w „I. K. C”.1 DIPLOMATIC CONTACTS OF THE GEORGIANS WITH THE MONGOLS (1235–1335) ARTISTIC RESEARCH PHILOSOPHY AND GEORGIA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1