{"title":"专业怀疑主义和独立审计师对审计师在日惹的财务监督和发展机构(BPKP)发现欺诈(欺诈)能力的影响","authors":"Paulince Grace Sigiro, T. Astuti","doi":"10.24905/mlt.v2i2.1293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research is a comparative kausal research that aims to find out: (1) A professional skepticism of the ability of auditor in detectin deception, (2) The independent influence of auditor for the auditors’ ability to detect fraud and (3) The influence of professional skeptics and the independent of auditors are simultan as to the ability in detecting deficiencies. The populasi and research are the auditors who work for the Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan (BPKP) Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. In this research using a sample of s much as 35 auditors from 70 auditors, where this policy is the policy of the Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan (BPKP) Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. The research uses the questionnaires in the account of its data. The test technique used is a validation test technique and reliability test. The classic assumptions test include multisquinty testing tests, tests of normality, and the heterochromatic test. The hypothesis used in this research is the doble regression analysis. The result of this investigation indicates that: (1) professional skepticism has a effect on the ability of auditors in detecting deception, (2) the independent auditors has no effect on the ability of an auditor in detecting cheating, and (3) professional skeptics and independent auditors have a simultaneous effect on the ability of auditors in detecting deficiencies.","PeriodicalId":436420,"journal":{"name":"Multiplier: Jurnal Magister Manajemen","volume":"360 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PENGARUH SKEPTISME PROFESIONAL DAN INDEPENDENSI AUDITOR TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN AUDITOR DALAM MENDETEKSI KECURANGAN (FRAUD) DI BADAN PENGAWASAN KEUANGAN DAN PEMBANGUNAN (BPKP) DI DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA\",\"authors\":\"Paulince Grace Sigiro, T. Astuti\",\"doi\":\"10.24905/mlt.v2i2.1293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The research is a comparative kausal research that aims to find out: (1) A professional skepticism of the ability of auditor in detectin deception, (2) The independent influence of auditor for the auditors’ ability to detect fraud and (3) The influence of professional skeptics and the independent of auditors are simultan as to the ability in detecting deficiencies. The populasi and research are the auditors who work for the Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan (BPKP) Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. In this research using a sample of s much as 35 auditors from 70 auditors, where this policy is the policy of the Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan (BPKP) Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. The research uses the questionnaires in the account of its data. The test technique used is a validation test technique and reliability test. The classic assumptions test include multisquinty testing tests, tests of normality, and the heterochromatic test. The hypothesis used in this research is the doble regression analysis. The result of this investigation indicates that: (1) professional skepticism has a effect on the ability of auditors in detecting deception, (2) the independent auditors has no effect on the ability of an auditor in detecting cheating, and (3) professional skeptics and independent auditors have a simultaneous effect on the ability of auditors in detecting deficiencies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":436420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multiplier: Jurnal Magister Manajemen\",\"volume\":\"360 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multiplier: Jurnal Magister Manajemen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24905/mlt.v2i2.1293\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiplier: Jurnal Magister Manajemen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24905/mlt.v2i2.1293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
本研究是一项比较因果关系研究,旨在发现:(1)对审计师发现欺诈能力的专业怀疑,(2)审计师对审计师发现欺诈能力的独立影响,以及(3)专业怀疑论者和独立审计师对发现缺陷能力的影响是同时存在的。大众和研究人员是在日惹的巴丹Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan (BPKP) Daerah istimea工作的审计员。在这项研究中,从70名审核员中抽取了35名审核员作为样本,其中这项政策是日惹的巴丹Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan (BPKP) Daerah Istimewa。该研究使用调查问卷来记录其数据。所使用的测试技术是验证性测试技术和可靠性测试。经典的假设检验包括多斜视检验、正态性检验和异色检验。本研究使用的假设是双回归分析。调查结果表明:(1)职业怀疑主义对审计师发现舞弊的能力有影响;(2)独立审计师对审计师发现舞弊的能力没有影响;(3)职业怀疑主义和独立审计师对审计师发现缺陷的能力有同步影响。
PENGARUH SKEPTISME PROFESIONAL DAN INDEPENDENSI AUDITOR TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN AUDITOR DALAM MENDETEKSI KECURANGAN (FRAUD) DI BADAN PENGAWASAN KEUANGAN DAN PEMBANGUNAN (BPKP) DI DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA
The research is a comparative kausal research that aims to find out: (1) A professional skepticism of the ability of auditor in detectin deception, (2) The independent influence of auditor for the auditors’ ability to detect fraud and (3) The influence of professional skeptics and the independent of auditors are simultan as to the ability in detecting deficiencies. The populasi and research are the auditors who work for the Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan (BPKP) Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. In this research using a sample of s much as 35 auditors from 70 auditors, where this policy is the policy of the Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan (BPKP) Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. The research uses the questionnaires in the account of its data. The test technique used is a validation test technique and reliability test. The classic assumptions test include multisquinty testing tests, tests of normality, and the heterochromatic test. The hypothesis used in this research is the doble regression analysis. The result of this investigation indicates that: (1) professional skepticism has a effect on the ability of auditors in detecting deception, (2) the independent auditors has no effect on the ability of an auditor in detecting cheating, and (3) professional skeptics and independent auditors have a simultaneous effect on the ability of auditors in detecting deficiencies.