社会媒体与二十一世纪公众参与

P. Boudreau
{"title":"社会媒体与二十一世纪公众参与","authors":"P. Boudreau","doi":"10.1163/9789004380271_091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are many competing ways for modern audiences to receive information and news of interest and importance to them. Researchers publish in scientific literature. Politicians and managers receive briefing notes from staff. The general population continues to receive information from radio, television, newspapers, and journals. In 1998, in the foreword to Elisabeth Mann Borgese’s book The Oceanic Circle, Ruud Lubbers wrote, “The new information and communication technology gives enormous possibilities to connect people and to empower people. Therefore the world is not any longer only a total of the nation-states; it is also about participatory democracy globally, and global sovereignty of peoples.” This statement predates the widespread development and use of the Internet and in particular the twenty-first century phenomena referred to as ‘social media’. I ask here whether we are in a position to see social media as addressing the possibilities envisaged by the Club of Rome in 1998. At face value, social media is free to access, easy for individuals to contribute to and potentially more engaging than traditional sources, as it can be finetuned to the specific interest of the reader. But there is a question about this relatively new phenomenon: Is it a help or a distraction in regards to exposing and engaging the general public to the benefits and challenges facing our coasts and oceans? What roles might it play in responsible ocean governance? One of the first issues concerning this question is the definition of social media. As a relatively new and quickly changing technology, it is difficult to strictly restrict the topic to present day online applications. Social media truly began to be a global communication tool with the launch and subsequent growth of Facebook, which started in 2004. Other common present-day tools include: 1) LinkedIn—launched in 2003 2) YouTube—launched in 2005 3) Twitter—launched in 2006 4) WhatsApp—launched in 2009 5) Instagram—launched 2010 6) Snapchat—launched 2011","PeriodicalId":423731,"journal":{"name":"The Future of Ocean Governance and Capacity Development","volume":"143 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Media and Twenty-First Century Public Engagement\",\"authors\":\"P. Boudreau\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004380271_091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are many competing ways for modern audiences to receive information and news of interest and importance to them. Researchers publish in scientific literature. Politicians and managers receive briefing notes from staff. The general population continues to receive information from radio, television, newspapers, and journals. In 1998, in the foreword to Elisabeth Mann Borgese’s book The Oceanic Circle, Ruud Lubbers wrote, “The new information and communication technology gives enormous possibilities to connect people and to empower people. Therefore the world is not any longer only a total of the nation-states; it is also about participatory democracy globally, and global sovereignty of peoples.” This statement predates the widespread development and use of the Internet and in particular the twenty-first century phenomena referred to as ‘social media’. I ask here whether we are in a position to see social media as addressing the possibilities envisaged by the Club of Rome in 1998. At face value, social media is free to access, easy for individuals to contribute to and potentially more engaging than traditional sources, as it can be finetuned to the specific interest of the reader. But there is a question about this relatively new phenomenon: Is it a help or a distraction in regards to exposing and engaging the general public to the benefits and challenges facing our coasts and oceans? What roles might it play in responsible ocean governance? One of the first issues concerning this question is the definition of social media. As a relatively new and quickly changing technology, it is difficult to strictly restrict the topic to present day online applications. Social media truly began to be a global communication tool with the launch and subsequent growth of Facebook, which started in 2004. Other common present-day tools include: 1) LinkedIn—launched in 2003 2) YouTube—launched in 2005 3) Twitter—launched in 2006 4) WhatsApp—launched in 2009 5) Instagram—launched 2010 6) Snapchat—launched 2011\",\"PeriodicalId\":423731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Future of Ocean Governance and Capacity Development\",\"volume\":\"143 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Future of Ocean Governance and Capacity Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004380271_091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Future of Ocean Governance and Capacity Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004380271_091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现代受众有许多相互竞争的方式来接收他们感兴趣和重要的信息和新闻。研究人员在科学文献中发表文章。政界人士和管理人员从员工那里收到简报。普通民众继续从广播、电视、报纸和杂志上获得信息。1998年,Ruud Lubbers在Elisabeth Mann Borgese的著作《海洋圈》(the Oceanic Circle)的前言中写道:“新的信息和通信技术为人们之间的联系和赋予人们权力提供了巨大的可能性。因此,世界不再仅仅是民族国家的总和;这也是关于全球参与性民主和全球人民主权的问题。”这一说法早于互联网的广泛发展和使用,特别是21世纪被称为“社交媒体”的现象。我想问的是,我们是否可以将社交媒体视为1998年罗马俱乐部设想的可能性。从表面上看,社交媒体是免费访问的,个人很容易做出贡献,而且可能比传统资源更吸引人,因为它可以根据读者的特定兴趣进行微调。但关于这个相对较新的现象,有一个问题:它是一种帮助,还是一种干扰,让公众了解我们海岸和海洋面临的好处和挑战?它在负责任的海洋治理中可能发挥什么作用?关于这个问题的第一个问题是社交媒体的定义。作为一项相对较新的快速变化的技术,很难将主题严格限制在当今的在线应用中。社交媒体真正开始成为一种全球性的交流工具,是随着2004年Facebook的推出和随后的发展。其他常见的现代工具包括:1)2003年推出的linkedin; 2) 2005年推出的youtube; 3) 2006年推出的twitter; 4) 2009年推出的whatsapp; 5) 2010年推出的instagram; 6) 2011年推出的snapchat
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social Media and Twenty-First Century Public Engagement
There are many competing ways for modern audiences to receive information and news of interest and importance to them. Researchers publish in scientific literature. Politicians and managers receive briefing notes from staff. The general population continues to receive information from radio, television, newspapers, and journals. In 1998, in the foreword to Elisabeth Mann Borgese’s book The Oceanic Circle, Ruud Lubbers wrote, “The new information and communication technology gives enormous possibilities to connect people and to empower people. Therefore the world is not any longer only a total of the nation-states; it is also about participatory democracy globally, and global sovereignty of peoples.” This statement predates the widespread development and use of the Internet and in particular the twenty-first century phenomena referred to as ‘social media’. I ask here whether we are in a position to see social media as addressing the possibilities envisaged by the Club of Rome in 1998. At face value, social media is free to access, easy for individuals to contribute to and potentially more engaging than traditional sources, as it can be finetuned to the specific interest of the reader. But there is a question about this relatively new phenomenon: Is it a help or a distraction in regards to exposing and engaging the general public to the benefits and challenges facing our coasts and oceans? What roles might it play in responsible ocean governance? One of the first issues concerning this question is the definition of social media. As a relatively new and quickly changing technology, it is difficult to strictly restrict the topic to present day online applications. Social media truly began to be a global communication tool with the launch and subsequent growth of Facebook, which started in 2004. Other common present-day tools include: 1) LinkedIn—launched in 2003 2) YouTube—launched in 2005 3) Twitter—launched in 2006 4) WhatsApp—launched in 2009 5) Instagram—launched 2010 6) Snapchat—launched 2011
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Information Matters: Global Perspectives about Communication at the Science-Policy Interface Elisabeth Mann Borgese’s Invisible Hand in Ocean Governance: Past, Present, and Future The Deep Sea Floor as a Battleground for Justice? Settling Maritime Boundaries: Why Some Countries Find It Easy, and Others Do Not The Future of Managing Fisheries and the Global Commons through Regional Fisheries Management Organizations: Steps toward Global Stewardship
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1