颈椎轴向mri t2w - tse笛卡尔与t2w - tse刀片图像质量的定量分析

D. Rochmayanti, E. Murniati, Fatimah Fatimah, Akhmad Haris Sulistyadi
{"title":"颈椎轴向mri t2w - tse笛卡尔与t2w - tse刀片图像质量的定量分析","authors":"D. Rochmayanti, E. Murniati, Fatimah Fatimah, Akhmad Haris Sulistyadi","doi":"10.31983/jimed.v8i2.8955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Backgroud: blurring artifact is an issue in axial cervical MRI using T2 Turbo Spin Echo (TSE) weighted Cartesian. T2W TSE BLADE is potential to substitute its shortcomings. This study aims to analyze the image quality and artifacts between T2W TSE Cartesian and T2W TSE BLADE on axial cervical MRI examination and to determine the better sequence in producing image quality.Methods: this is a quantitative research with descriptive approach. 7 volunteers were scanned for cervical axial examination with T2W TSE, T2W TSE Cartesian and T2W TSE Blade. Images were processed in MathlabTM. SNR of intervertebral disc, spinal cord and CSF were measured using ROI. Image resolution were find out from pixel spacing in DICOM info. Blurring artifact were analyzed by comparing the signal of blurred area to the background noise. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.Results: SNR of T2W TSE Cartesian and T2W TSE BLADE were 22,144 and 17,532 (intervertebral disc), 20,952 and 16,786 (spinal cord), and 16,717 and 12,883 (CSF) respectively. Image resolution (mean) were 0,391 pixel/mm (T2W TSE Cartesian) and 0,625 (T2W TSE BLADE). Blurring artifact were 8,161 (T2W TSE Cartesian) and 6,826 (T2W TSE Blade).Conclusion: T2W TSE Cartesian was superior in pixel intensity and SNR, while the blade technique was superior in terms of spatial resolution and artifacts reduction. Thus, it is recommended to be applied in clinical field if the SNR or image detail is the priority.","PeriodicalId":205622,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Imejing Diagnostik (JImeD)","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IMAGE QUALITY OF T2W TSE CARTESIAN VERSUS T2W TSE BLADE, A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS ON AXIAL CERVICAL MRI\",\"authors\":\"D. Rochmayanti, E. Murniati, Fatimah Fatimah, Akhmad Haris Sulistyadi\",\"doi\":\"10.31983/jimed.v8i2.8955\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Backgroud: blurring artifact is an issue in axial cervical MRI using T2 Turbo Spin Echo (TSE) weighted Cartesian. T2W TSE BLADE is potential to substitute its shortcomings. This study aims to analyze the image quality and artifacts between T2W TSE Cartesian and T2W TSE BLADE on axial cervical MRI examination and to determine the better sequence in producing image quality.Methods: this is a quantitative research with descriptive approach. 7 volunteers were scanned for cervical axial examination with T2W TSE, T2W TSE Cartesian and T2W TSE Blade. Images were processed in MathlabTM. SNR of intervertebral disc, spinal cord and CSF were measured using ROI. Image resolution were find out from pixel spacing in DICOM info. Blurring artifact were analyzed by comparing the signal of blurred area to the background noise. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.Results: SNR of T2W TSE Cartesian and T2W TSE BLADE were 22,144 and 17,532 (intervertebral disc), 20,952 and 16,786 (spinal cord), and 16,717 and 12,883 (CSF) respectively. Image resolution (mean) were 0,391 pixel/mm (T2W TSE Cartesian) and 0,625 (T2W TSE BLADE). Blurring artifact were 8,161 (T2W TSE Cartesian) and 6,826 (T2W TSE Blade).Conclusion: T2W TSE Cartesian was superior in pixel intensity and SNR, while the blade technique was superior in terms of spatial resolution and artifacts reduction. Thus, it is recommended to be applied in clinical field if the SNR or image detail is the priority.\",\"PeriodicalId\":205622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Imejing Diagnostik (JImeD)\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Imejing Diagnostik (JImeD)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31983/jimed.v8i2.8955\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Imejing Diagnostik (JImeD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31983/jimed.v8i2.8955","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用T2涡轮自旋回波(TSE)加权笛卡儿进行轴向颈椎MRI时,模糊伪影是一个问题。T2W TSE BLADE有潜力取代它的缺点。本研究旨在分析T2W TSE Cartesian和T2W TSE BLADE在颈椎轴向MRI检查中的图像质量和伪影,确定产生图像质量较好的序列。方法:采用描述性的定量研究方法。采用T2W TSE、T2W TSE笛卡尔和T2W TSE刀片对7名志愿者进行颈椎轴位扫描。在MathlabTM中对图像进行处理。采用ROI测量椎间盘、脊髓和脑脊液的信噪比。从DICOM信息中的像素间距求出图像分辨率。通过将模糊区域的信号与背景噪声进行比较,分析了模糊伪影。数据分析采用描述性统计。结果:T2W TSE Cartesian和T2W TSE BLADE的信噪比(椎间盘)分别为22144和17532,脊髓分别为20952和16786,CSF分别为16717和12883。图像分辨率(平均)为0,391像素/毫米(T2W TSE笛卡尔)和0,625像素/毫米(T2W TSE BLADE)。模糊伪影是8,161 (T2W TSE笛卡尔)和6,826 (T2W TSE刀片)。结论:T2W TSE笛卡尔法在像元强度和信噪比方面优于T2W TSE笛卡尔法,而叶片法在空间分辨率和伪影降低方面优于T2W TSE笛卡尔法。因此,如果优先考虑信噪比或图像细节,建议应用于临床领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IMAGE QUALITY OF T2W TSE CARTESIAN VERSUS T2W TSE BLADE, A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS ON AXIAL CERVICAL MRI
Backgroud: blurring artifact is an issue in axial cervical MRI using T2 Turbo Spin Echo (TSE) weighted Cartesian. T2W TSE BLADE is potential to substitute its shortcomings. This study aims to analyze the image quality and artifacts between T2W TSE Cartesian and T2W TSE BLADE on axial cervical MRI examination and to determine the better sequence in producing image quality.Methods: this is a quantitative research with descriptive approach. 7 volunteers were scanned for cervical axial examination with T2W TSE, T2W TSE Cartesian and T2W TSE Blade. Images were processed in MathlabTM. SNR of intervertebral disc, spinal cord and CSF were measured using ROI. Image resolution were find out from pixel spacing in DICOM info. Blurring artifact were analyzed by comparing the signal of blurred area to the background noise. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.Results: SNR of T2W TSE Cartesian and T2W TSE BLADE were 22,144 and 17,532 (intervertebral disc), 20,952 and 16,786 (spinal cord), and 16,717 and 12,883 (CSF) respectively. Image resolution (mean) were 0,391 pixel/mm (T2W TSE Cartesian) and 0,625 (T2W TSE BLADE). Blurring artifact were 8,161 (T2W TSE Cartesian) and 6,826 (T2W TSE Blade).Conclusion: T2W TSE Cartesian was superior in pixel intensity and SNR, while the blade technique was superior in terms of spatial resolution and artifacts reduction. Thus, it is recommended to be applied in clinical field if the SNR or image detail is the priority.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluasi Pemeriksaan MRI Brain dengan Klinis Vertigo di Rumah Sakit Otak dr. Drs. M. Hatta Bukittinggi Implementasi Pemanfaatan Sumber Radiasi Pengion pada Ruang CT Scan ditinjau berdasarkan Peraturan BAPETEN No. 4 tahun 2020 di Instalasi Radiologi Rumah Sakit type B di Wilayah Kabupaten Sumedang Nilai Entrance Skin Dose Tiroid antara menggunakan Thyroid Shield dan tanpa Thyroid Shield pada Pemeriksaan CT Scan Kepala Analisis Informasi Anatomi Pemeriksaan MRI Ankle Joint pada Penggunaan Foot Ankle Coil dan Flex Coil Proton Density Fat Saturation Irisan Sagital Evaluasi Kualitas Radiograf Periapikal Teknik Bisektris : Kesalahan Penempatan Sudut Penyinaran dan Film
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1